I guess it depends on how individuals interpret it. Some think "freedom of religion" means you can choose any religion you want, as long as you choose something. But doesn't it actually mean that the state (meaning the federal government) does not have the right to impose a religion on the people? That would imply that they are not only free to choose what they do believe, but also what they do not believe - in essence, freedom from religion.
There was a recent Supreme Court decision in Canada that's rippling through every municipal government that has, or used to have, a prayer to open every meeting. They're not supposed to do this anymore. Some municipalities have complied, while others have not.
Ah, no more multiculti and reasonable access/accommodation? Too hard so the law will side with a sole culti and decree the others banned from that specific space? That argument that one culti isn't actually a culti so long as it wins?
Ah, no more multiculti and reasonable access/accommodation? Too hard so the law will side with a sole culti and decree the others banned from that specific space? That argument that one culti isn't actually a culti so long as it wins?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.