dojoboy
Tsalagi
Re: cheating. I don't believe we should go further with the discussion here in the spoiler. Start a thread on the topic for frank discussions. I'd be interested in reading it from a social study perspective.
1.27f Open
said it was a good idea, moved SE. Starting with alphabet and masonry at emperor level means only one thing to me. A 40 turn gambit on something. I chose writing with a view to literature after that and kept my fingers crossed that I could get pottery through trade pretty quickly. In a few turns I met England, got my granary and reached the by now familiar position shown in the shot.
and my collection of towns and hamlets at 1000BC.

No, just a general observation that you can't assume that contact will never happen until late middle ages.Karasu said:That was walking of the edge of spoiler information, wasn't it...![]()

The forum rules are clear and there's a link in teh moderator action edit and at the bottom of every forum page. If you want to complain about anything in this forum then you should take your concerns and evidence to the moderators - me or Ainwood via PM in the first instance. If you are not satisfied with their response then you should escalate to Thunderfall.samildanach said:Who do I raise it with if I think a member of staff is cheating?
We have zero tolerance of it - from all players.I've said it before that it should be all or nothing - that we should either allow cheating or have zero tolerance for it

1.27f Open
Welcome back DaveMcW. I'm pleased to see we were able to tempt you back. No problems guessing your objective for this game, thenDaveMcW said:I had to come back for one more GOTM since the Pantheon of Heroes is up.![]()

Hey, Dave, is that another way of saying "Just one more turn"DaveMcW said:I had to come back for one more GOTM since the Pantheon of Heroes is up.![]()
.samildanach said:I see no good reason for PTW players not to have upgraded to 1.27f and in my view it should be mandatory. Why isn't it ? Incidentally, I'm not accusing civ_steve of cheating but of behaving in an unfair manner, ....
QUOTE]
Boy, I miss a couple of days with down forum time thrown in, and look what happens!! I'm glad you're not accusing me of cheating ... but behaving unfairly?
I haven't upgraded to 1.27 because the patch is huge at 11.2 Mbytes (I don't know if my dial-up will survive a 2 hour connection), and knowledgeable players reviewed the patch and said it was almost entirely devoted to fixing bugs and stability issues with multi-player mode which I don't use. I've never experimented with 1.27 (I barely have time to finish the GOTM), and in NO WAY is my use of 1.21 a choice on my part to gain any advantage!!
In an earlier post you made an issue of the Great Library Elevator that I used in Gotm29 (Egypt). First, this is not a banned exploit. Second, I related the tactic I used to capture the Great Library to gain several Techs beyond Education on the same turn that I learned Education from the GL. I didn't invent it; it's use has been presented in the Spoilers before; I believe that relating the tactic makes the competition more fair because newer participants are exposed to it. Third, I am fairly sure you are misunderstanding the bug with the Great Library that 1.27 fixes. I believe (but do not know, because I've never tested 1.27; besides, this was the first time I'd ever done this tactic) that the bug deals with heavily modified Tech Tables where certain predecessor Techs are unclear. In this circumstance, it appears that the GLib might give you advanced Techs in the normal way it is used. I suspect that when captured the GLib will behave in 1.27 exactly as it did for me in 1.21. I don't know this for certain, but SirPleb has reported gaining 4 Industrial Age Techs from a captured GLib while playing Conquests (HOF, 'SirPleb going for SID'), and it would seem odd for Firaxis to reintroduce this behavior in Conquests if it were eliminated in 1.27.
Well, back to behaving unfairly ... If 1.21 us SOOOO powerful, why isn't everybody playing it? If Predator level makes the game SOOOO easy, why aren't more Open players switching? I dislike being singled out for making choices that are available to all, so as long as these options are available in GOTM, switch if you believe them to be advantageous.
civ_steve said:I suspect that when captured the GLib will behave in 1.27 exactly as it did for me in 1.21. I don't know this for certain, but SirPleb has reported gaining 4 Industrial Age Techs from a captured GLib while playing Conquests (HOF, 'SirPleb going for SID'), and it would seem odd for Firaxis to reintroduce this behavior in Conquests if it were eliminated in 1.27.
AlanH said:Welcome back DaveMcW. I'm pleased to see we were able to tempt you back. No problems guessing your objective for this game, then![]()


I didn't really expect that. I had just starting my swordman production.
1.21f
Probably got Masonry from that hut he just beat me to! Check with Elizabeth ... sure enough, she has Masonry also. So much for trading power
I buy Pottery from Iroquois for 20 Gold and 1 gpt. I've already decided that Elizabeth will be the first civ I meet in battle, and I don't want to give her any additional help.
Changing that one thing has raised my level of play more than any other factor. This game is going to be tough for me though, because I still have favorite civs that I play. The French are definitely not one of them. I expect I will learn quite a bit.
All I could do was hope he went for the wine hill. I doubted it. But Lizzy got greedy and her pair indeed moved south. I founded Orleans on my red-dot hill. Who was it that said, Only mad dogs and Englishmen lay out in the noonday sun?
