Guess the Map IX: The Richese are no match

Signatories of some treaty?

Nothing to do with politics.

It's something to do with inflation?

Nothing to do with economy.

All right, I don't think Iceland and Central America really fit with this guess, but is it related to Islam in any way?

Not directly. Islam might cause countries to be blue, I guess; although I can't really think of a reason why.

Eritrea being red could also be a decent clue, i suppose..

No, it isn't. Vatican City being blue is a decent clue.
Being red is in a way the default status; all the blue countries usually have a reason to be blue.

There are some countries which are blue because of government action in combination with culture, though.

A country is or blue or red. Purple means it is neither (or both, in a way).
 
Something to do with gender or representation by gender?

Yes. Blue country's have a mostly male population, red countries mostly female, and purple countries have an equal distribution.
 
Is that the answer then?

I feel you've given it away. But I'm not sure how or why. Was Yeekim just too close to bother with it any more?
 
It was not really a good map idea imo :/ Most countries (with a few notable exceptions like China and iirc India) have close to a 50-50 split, or the typical 49-51. So the map did not really have much to guess..
 
It's no coincidence that the developed countries have a predominance of females. Over the age of ~70 women outnumber men by 7 to 1*. Or so I've heard.

Countries which practice infanticide (!) or selective abortion are likely to favour males.

*Information gleaned from my bumper book of made-up statistics.
 
Some countries have a preference for male children. In others, women die from childbirth and/or exploitation a lot. In others, women are exported to neighbouring countries as slaves, maids, prostitues or a combination of two or three of those.
 
Is that the answer then?

I feel you've given it away. But I'm not sure how or why. Was Yeekim just too close to bother with it any more?

I misunderstood the word 'representation' for 'distribution'. My bad. So what does 'gender representation' mean?

Not that it would have taken long to guess after I would have said it had to do with gender.



It was not really a good map idea imo :/ Most countries (with a few notable exceptions like China and iirc India) have close to a 50-50 split, or the typical 49-51. So the map did not really have much to guess..

Answering with Takhisis' quote.

Some countries have a preference for male children. In others, women die from childbirth and/or exploitation a lot. In others, women are exported to neighbouring countries as slaves, maids, prostitues or a combination of two or three of those.
 
I misunderstood the word 'representation' for 'distribution'. My bad. So what does 'gender representation' mean?

Not that it would have taken long to guess after I would have said it had to do with gender.

Nonono. It doesn't matter. I was just confused. That's all.

I've no idea if there's any difference between representation and distribution.
 
You need taxation for one but not the other.
 
Some countries have a preference for male children. In others, women die from childbirth and/or exploitation a lot.

:huh:

Human sex ratio is a tricky business. I guess we'll have to start at the beginning...

Ok, first of all fertilisation is by no means equal and also actually quite variable.
I could go over the messy details with you (and explain how Mary Roach's Ted talk was a ridiculously ill-informed strawman) but it suffices if you merely appreciate that the ratio of male fertilisation generally goes up when a population's health and well-being improves (particularly that of young women obviosly).
Secondly, fetuses are not equal either. Male fetuses are bluntly put more fragile and more succeptible to negative environmental influences. They are also more likely to be defective in some way, which can be remedied by some socities more often than others. Again: As a population's health and well-being increases so does the ratio of male births.

Obviously in some countries active selection is an issue (looking at you, east Asia).
None the less if you look at sex ratios at birth in global comparison you will notice a pretty strong trend.
On the one hand, right up there with China you have the likes of Luxemburg and New Zealand.
By now virtually every country on the planet has more male than female births. A good ball-park number for the parts of the developed world with functioning universal healthcare would be 106/100.
The bottom of the list would be - you could have guessed it - placwes like Haiti and Zimbabwe at virtual parity.
There are still occasionally cohorts born in which females outnumber males, mostly in famines and really ugly civil wars. Darfur may be a candidate.
On the other hand if you look at particular classes of people in developed countries (educated, wealthy, a culture of treating women well doesn't hurt either) you can easily find sex ratios at birth up to 110 and beyond.

Then, obviously people are not equal once they are born either. And not necessarily because anybody has bad (read: sexist) intentions.
Male infants are a lot more susceptable to a wide variety of health problems, which - again - can be remidied in highly organised wealthy societies, but leads to a nearly complete "correction" of the (comparitively small) male surplus at birth in many places in Africa.

In others, women are exported to neighbouring countries as slaves, maids, prostitues or a combination of two or three of those.

The countries that are most prominent for a) young adult women leaving voluntarily or b) young adult women being made to leave in one of the fashions you mentioned are the very ones that have the most pronounced surplusses in female population in general and among young adults as well.
A particular factor in many of these countries (former communist utopias) is gender in education: Ukraine is cranking out more female college graduates than Germany every year, at roughly half the population.

And for the countries with the highest male surplusses among adults it's not so much about sex selection in newborns as much as about migration, too.
Typically these are the countries that attract male migrant workers, who live, work and die in abject conditions, one of which would be not being allowed to bring their families.
Hooray for having the world cup in one of these glorious societies btw...

Anywho, these are the maps you guys were probably looking for (from the very same wikipedia entry as the one strijder posted):

640px-Sex_ratio_total_population_per_country_smooth_2.png


Total population (compared to the global average of 101 per 100).



640px-Sex_ratio_below_15_per_country_smooth_2.png


Population below age 15 (compared to the global average of 106 per 100).
 
I think this deserves a new thread, but the population movements in third world countries are not sufficiently researched. Also, dodgy government statistic can be blamed as borderland populations often have dual citizenship so as to vote for corrupt local strongmen on either side of their borders.
 
Yes. Blue country's have a mostly male population, red countries mostly female, and purple countries have an equal distribution.
Wow! I was close, but I actually didn't think of quite the correct answer. I was thrown off-track by you saying that red is somewhat of a "default" status - while I've always known, as metatron correctly points out, that male births actually tend to be a bit more numerous (on the other hand, that is probably to balance out men getting themselves killed early, so meh). So I was thinking that in blue countries women are underrepresented in some other way.

Anyway, I'll try to find something soon...
 
Yes. Blue country's have a mostly male population, red countries mostly female, and purple countries have an equal distribution.
Wow! I was close, but I actually didn't think of quite the correct answer. I was thrown off-track by you saying that red is somewhat of a "default" status - while I've always known, as metatron correctly points out, that male births actually tend to be a bit more numerous (on the other hand, that is probably to balance out men getting themselves killed early, so meh). So I was thinking that in blue countries women are underrepresented in some other, bit more nuanced way.

Anyway, I'll try to find something soon...

EDIT: So...
Yellow: Option 1
Orange: Option 2
Striped: Tie between option 1 and 2
Blue: Other
 

Attachments

  • map.png
    map.png
    103.6 KB · Views: 67
NZXG0eZ.png


I'm a bit busy, so I'm going to declare open floor, though if I find time, I may take it myself.
 
Ok...

map.png


Due to this map being quite difficult to decipher, i will tell you immediately that it is centered on Kafka.

You have to guess what the colors largely mean. There are four cases: black, green, purple and red.

In general it could be said that: Black>Green>Red>Purple. But it not that clear if Green really is "more important" than Red.

Two more points:

-Borders are based on those (in most cases) up to WWI. So some of Romania's bit really was part of Hungary in the Austria-Hungary.

-Multi-colored countries are not split depending to any quality, they are just in multiple colors due to multiple relations to Kafka.

(final notes:

Israel was not in existence when Kafka died, in 1924

The map is pretty accurate, but i probably missed some more purples here and there

This map has no indication of where Kafka travelled. I used that in some older map. Places he travelled to are not colored at all, unless they are colored for other reasons).
 
Back
Top Bottom