Gunman Kills 8 in Attack on School in Jerusalem

Thanks, sweetie.

See? We can get along just like that, and I learn!

Edit:

BAH! I see what you did there! You repeated the arcane and pain-to-investigate references of the person who's work you are regurgitating!

You're not a sweetie :angry:

I want to click on something and see the words you quoted. I want to see where it came from. If it came from the book "The Ethnic Cleansing of Palis", via your own copy not online, feel free to cite that.

From interview with author:


http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=11102

Try this than http://indaily.net/?page_id=2710
 

Yay!!

Now I have much to examine and the source that started it.

---

That site (indaily.net) is pretty far out there, you know? Maybe you do not think so.

Do you really think the violence commited by Israel against Palestine is about ethnic cleansing and not terrorism?

Alot of stuff on that site calls the conflict ethnic cleansing, like:

The Jewish National Fund is charged with being a racist organization...

The JNF has been a major beneficiary of the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians perpetrated by the Israeli state. We the undersigned hereby petition the authorities responsible to rescind the charitable status of the JNF in Canada.

The site is as anti-Bush as moveon.org and it charges Israel with genocide.

Personally, I do not think the Jews are interested in tying to kill all the Palestinians (Jordanians, really, the vast majority of them) or all Arabs within Israel.

I don't think the terrorists are victims of a holocaust. I think they are terrorists, and they are not wanting peace ever, and we must kill them. Not because of ethnicity, but to protect innocent people.
 
What makes you think the Israeli/Palestinian is a problem about sharing land between Zionist and Msulims? Iraq, Pakistan or Turkey were never on the discussion table? Your map is completly dumb.

Now about the market value, smart as you are, I am sure you are aware about that the fact that Israel seized all land belonging to the Palestinians afetr the 1948 war, and it was for free, OK?

Thats because the pallies left on their own accord at the advice of their leaders. Well most of the, those that didn't now live in relative prosperity as Israeli arabs and not as pawns used by the muslims to foster hate. How much land did they take?

Why is the map dumb exactly? Its because you don't like the point it makes do you. The map is far from dumb.Maybe the arabs who advised the pallies to leave and go back after all those evil Jews were killed should maybe admit defeat and absorb the pallies instead of treating them garbage and pawns. No its much better to keep them as poor angry and uneducated trash.
 
anybody has the right to defend themslves from any attack, regardless of the reasons for the attack.

Yes but you don't defend your self by intentionally targeting civilians. Thats what terrorists do. Unless you think terrorism is ok. Do you? Do you think launching rockets at schools hoping to kill children is a legit way to defend your self? What about blowing up babies on buses? Is that defending your self? What about blowing up teens in a disco? Is that really defending your self?
 
Thats because the pallies left on their own accord at the advice of their leaders. Well most of the, those that didn't now live in relative prosperity as Israeli arabs and not as pawns used by the muslims to foster hate. How much land did they take?

Why is the map dumb exactly? Its because you don't like the point it makes do you. The map is far from dumb.Maybe the arabs who advised the pallies to leave and go back after all those evil Jews were killed should maybe admit defeat and absorb the pallies instead of treating them garbage and pawns. No its much better to keep them as poor angry and uneducated trash.

The pallies left on their own accord at the advice of their leaders? I did not know Rabin was leading the Palestinian in 1948 : :lol:


Yitzhak Rabin, one of Israel's Prime Ministers, had written in his diary soon after the occupation of Lydda and al-Ramla on July 10th-11th, 1948:

"After attacking Lydda [later called Lod] and then Ramla, .... What would they do with the 50,000 civilians living in the two cities ..... Not even Ben-Gurion could offer a solution .... and during the discussion at operation headquarters, he [Ben-Gurion] remained silent, as was his habit in such situations. Clearly, we could not leave [Lydda's] hostile and armed populace in our rear, where it could endangered the supply route [to the troops who were] advancing eastward.
Ben-Gurion would repeat the question: What is to be done with the population?, waving his hand in a gesture which said: Drive them out! [garesh otem in Hebrew]. 'Driving out' is a term with a harsh ring, .... Psychologically, this was on of the most difficult actions we undertook". (Soldier Of Peace, p. 140-141 & Benny Morris, p. 207) .
 
That book invents stuff. Sorry, but the critique is damning. Specifically, it is charged with "inventing facts and quotes".

It was apparently written by a real-life Commie Nazi (and I though such things did not actually exist).

You can't put your world view on a single fringe "historian", can you?

This is like Fiasco gone even more horribly wrong - Some guy gathers a few quotes, that amount to hearsay, and jumbles them into "evidence".

Even if the above quote from his diary is real, c'mon. The book is obviously put together to breed hatred, not to teach history from an objective perspective.


Long term ethnic cleansing? Really? I think it's a long term fight against terrorists. That those terrorists hide among civilians is a shame and tragedy, but it cannot be allowed to provide them sanctuary. You know, Palestinians could kill the terrorists themselves, then there wouldn't need to be any bombing...

Why don't the Palestinians just kill the terrorists and put an end to the trouble?

There are no suicide bomb Jews. The Jews do not target civilians. The Jews don't riot. The Jews don't topple international border walls and pour into Egypt for cheap cigarettes. The Jews don't senselessly destroy productive greenhouses. The Jews do not celebrate terrorist acts. It's really a one-sided problem. When all of the people who like Farfur are dead or wake-up, the healing can start.
 
No, I've made my point. If you want to start a thread on the topic, go ahead. you havent made any concrete points whatsoever.

Excuse me? It's not me who started babbling about who's part of the West and who is not in a thread concerning Palestinian terrorism. You've made no relevant point whatsoever, you just demonstrated your lack of knowledge and personal bias. At least admit it :rolleyes:

what happend to my comprehensive arguments?

To what "comprehensive arguments"?
 
That book invents stuff. Sorry, but the critique is damning. Specifically, it is charged with "inventing facts and quotes".
It was apparently written by a real-life Commie Nazi (and I though such things did not really exist).

not only he is a commie nazi, but he is an israeli-jew also :lol: :lol:
But I am sure an Ecofarmer from the US has more insight about the conflict that Ilan Pappe

You can't put your world view on a single fringe "historian", can you?
This is like Fiasco gone even more horribly wrong.

OK, you don't like Ilan Pappe because he is a jew? Try Tom segev than ;)
 
Eco, try Benny Morris, I think he is not a commie-nazi, He is jewish though, I hope you don't have a problem with that :lol:



On April 8-9 1948 Ben-Gurion told Mishmar Ha'emek representatives to burn and destroy the neighboring villages, he said:

"[They] said it was imperative to expel the Arabs [in the area] and to burn the villages. For me, the matter was very difficult. [But] they said that they were not sure [the kibbutz could continue to exist] if the villages remained intact and [if] the Arab inhabitants were not expelled, for they [i.e. the Palestinian Arabs villagers] would [later] attack them [i.e. Mishmar Ha'emek]." (Benny Morris, p. 116)

"They [Mishmar Ha'emek people] faced a cruel reality ... [and] saw that there was [only] one way and that was to expel the Arab villagers and burn the villages. And they did this. And they were the first to do this." (Benny Morris, p. 116)
 
Yes but you don't defend your self by intentionally targeting civilians. Thats what terrorists do. Unless you think terrorism is ok. Do you? Do you think launching rockets at schools hoping to kill children is a legit way to defend your self? What about blowing up babies on buses? Is that defending your self? What about blowing up teens in a disco? Is that really defending your self?

As I said in one of my previous posts (conveniently ignored by the "blame Israel" crowd): Israelis make distiction between combatants and non-combatants. This concept is obviously alien to the Palestinians, they see civilians as legitimate targets, which is why they're nothing but barbarians.

I say it's time for a good old collective punishment.
 
As I said in one of my previous posts (conveniently ignored by the "blame Israel" crowd): Israelis make distiction between combatants and non-combatants. This concept is obviously alien to the Palestinians, they see civilians as legitimate targets, which is why they're nothing but barbarians.
I say it's time for a good old collective punishment.

Palestinian are barbarians because they target civilian. Thus it is time to punish palestinian civilians :crazyeye: :crazyeye:

We truly should ignore all your posts :lol:
 
The first time a village ever got burned? Don't you see how ridiculous it is to assume we have found the start of the conflict here - and the Jews (who would have guessed) are to blame.

The paragrpah reads as if we have found the original act of violence and can hereby officially and historically blame the Jews.

Do you think the book is objective and unbaised?

ps. A Jewish Commie Nazi?! I give up. It's just a book from a guy with a political agenda - not the official history of the Israel conflict.

Many homes were burned, and many people were killed a thousand times in the history of mankind, and none of it justifies targetting civilians (terrorism). A thousand stories the same would not excuse the murder commited by Hamas and other Palestinian terrorists.

You can go back in history as far as you want, but 1 thing matters today: Do they target innocent civilians? If the answer is yes, then they should die. If that costs some additional lives, that's the price we pay to get rid of scum of the earth. Better a few innocents die today than many tomorrow. Nobody cares where they are from or what they look like. The world cares about 1 thing: are they terrorists. It's not ethnic cleansing (at least, certainly not today); it's terrorist cleansing - and Palestine could use alot of it.

Seriously, it has nothing to do with ethnicity. The terrorists should be killed. It really is that simple.
 
Palestinian are barbarians because they target civilian. Thus it is time to punish palestinian civilians :crazyeye: :crazyeye:

We truly should ignore all your posts :lol:

He didn't say target for death now did he. Do you not understand the difference?
 
I think running around calling anyone who disagrees with Israel's policies a "Nazi" (i) shows tremendous political ignorance, and (ii) is a disgrace to the people who lost their lives in the Holocaust, the true victims of Nazism.

Cleo
 
I think running around calling anyone who disagrees with Israel's policies a "Nazi" (i) shows tremendous political ignorance, and (ii) is a disgrace to the people who lost their lives in the Holocaust, the true victims of Nazism.

Cleo

Really, Jews use the Holocaust card like a race card. I really think that the Holocaust is the major driving force behind the west's protectionism of Israel. How about you let the place fend for itself, rather than protect it like a child, a child with a thirst for violence.
 
the article said hamas didnt claim responsibilty for it, and it looks to me like some pissed off arab did it, who wasnt a member of any organization.

saying they could as well have done it themselves isnt particularly going for good pr...

True, but they praised the attack and applauded any further ones.

And depriving economic priveleges and shelling villages isn't wrong either? No side holds the moral high ground. They need to acknowledge this and actually engage in useful dialogue.

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Hamas claimed responsibility on Friday for shooting eight students at a Jewish seminary in Jerusalem, the most lethal Palestinian attack on Israelis in two years and a blow to international efforts to revive peace talks.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080307/ts_nm/palestinians_israel_dc

I think that puts Hamas squarely on the low moral ground. I don't want to engage in dialogue, neither do the Israelis, and neither should you. It's time for the leadership of Hamas to be executed.
 
Really, Jews use the Holocaust card like a race card. I really think that the Holocaust is the major driving force behind the west's protectionism of Israel. How about you let the place fend for itself, rather than protect it like a child, a child with a thirst for violence.

Maybe because the Arabs continuously attacked it, and it's the role of any righteous and moral country to defend those who are being attacked. Under your scenario, why don't the rest of the world let Sudan kill all of Darfur or let Pol Pot remain in power... Oh wait they did! And genocides happen. That's why. You protect the innocent against vehement and irrational hatred.

And I think it's acceptable to use the Holocaust as a race card. Maybe if 6 million of your bretheren were systematically murdered, you'd want it to not happen again. Just a thought.
 
Back
Top Bottom