Thanks for the replies and sorry about the delay in doing these screens but I'm not that great at this sort of thing. OK, I probably haven't been paying attention or something
or maybe I'm doing something blindingly stupid
but I don't understand why the QScore query shows this for the EQM score:
but the deity League of Nations league table screen shows this:
and if you click on the number 2 in my Mansa box on the deity league of nations screen pictured above you see these two games:
but there's no date information there to show an EQM score
However, If I view them in my EQM Deity "status" screen, it looks like this:
which is where I can see 10.0 and 0.3 for the 2 games respectively.
Also, I wonder why
all the games in the ad hoc query screen are shown as scoring 0.0 for QM as opposed to EQM?
If Ozbenno is right about the reasons why there is a disparity between what the ad hoc query shows and what is shown in the league tables, then I think this a bit bizarre
since surely they should perform the same calculation? Er ... but then why does this QScore Query, in similar circumstances:
come up correctly as follows in my EQM Deity "status" screen ...
I think there's something slightly wrong here, honest.
As an aside, I thought the problem with the best game showing up as 100 while the second best gets a seriously low score had been solved by changing the way the calculation was done? I think something about a fake long date was mentioned, which would smooth out the curve. Otherwise, there's not much point in trying for the very hard games where competition is sparse ...
(Not that I'm suggesting my Mansa games were particularly hard you understand
)
I know you already do loads and I'm sorry to be whinging