How do you pronounce usernames?

I've always wondered how people pronounce my username. I pronounce it thus:

/sai.bɹiks.kan/

For those people who don't know IPA: sai-bricks-khan

If I'm feeling sophisticated:

/sai.bɽiks.xan/

The <r> would be similar to a Scottish one, not as rolled, and the <kh> would be like the German <ch>.

It took me a while to figure out how to pronounce your name. I ended up with just cyber-x-khan.
 
This thread is entirely useless with IPA.

This statement doesn't make any sense. For one thing English speakers pronounce their vowels in entirely different ways depending on the region they come from. It's relevant that in the inventory of english sounds on, say wikipedia, they have to use 2 columns: one for American vowels and one for standard British ones. I mean we can't even begin to talk on the same level among English speakers when you consider that rhotacism is a Thing (Americans use /&#633;/ and Brits omit it entirely). There's the fact that many American dialects don't differentiate between /&#596;/ and /&#593;/ while some American dialects do, and most all British ones do. This is just to name a few of the problems with spelling words "phonetically" Moreover many people here aren't native speakers, generally don't try to spell words phonetically in the same way that English speakers tend to and thus trying to "sound" out words the way we do is entirely useless. Take some examples here:

Ay-lead-hoo
Chuck-chee Husky

How do you pronounce Ay in this context? /e&#618;/ or /a&#618;/

What about lead? /l&#603;d/ or /lid/ or maybe even /li&#601;d/

is hoo pronounced /hu/ or /ho&#650;/

Owen Glyndwr -> O - win Glend - were
Dachs -> Dacks
Gucumatz -> goo - coo - matz

Is the win in O-win pronounced /w&#618;n/ or /win/ or even /&#603;n/, as some American dialects do not differentiate between /&#618;/ and /&#603;/. Is it /gl&#603;n/ or /gl&#618;n/ or /glen/? Is it /w&#601;r/ or /wer/ or /we&#618;r/?

What about Dacks? Is it /dæks/ or /d&#593;ks/ or /de&#618;ks/ or /d&#603;ks/

We also run into problems with inconsistent consonents, for example is it gu or d&#865;&#658;zu (z here taking the place of the voiced postalveolar fricative), moreover is it /ku/ or /su/ is it really /tz/? or is it /ts/? As most English speakers have a hard time with the /tz/ cluster when followed by the sound that is either /æ/ or /&#593;/. Moreover it is unclear which vowel it actually is.
 
O -> oh rhymes with no
Dacks -> ryhmes with hacks

Trying to force us to learn and use IPA will destroy and excellent opportunity to feed the postcount monster through explanations such as this that would become redundant under your oppressive regime. :p
 
He means it's useless with IPA because hardly anyone can read IPA.

It really isn't that hard to learn and makes this thread a thousand times clearer.

O -> oh rhymes with no
Dacks -> ryhmes with hacks

Trying to force us to learn and use IPA will destroy and excellent opportunity to feed the postcount monster through explanations such as this that would become redundant under your oppressive regime.

no in which way? Is it /o/ or /o&#650;/?

hacks in which way? /æ/ or /a/?
 
Okay, everyone, you heard the man. Close the thread, it's apparently useless. Alert everyone who liked it that it's useless.
 
I don't see what useless has to do with this, as far as I can tell he hasn't even posted here.
 
This statement doesn't make any sense.

He means it's useless with IPA because hardly anyone can read IPA.

Probably should've added 'for me and most people' to qualify IPA's uselessness in this thread, because yeah, I get why IPA would be useful for those few that actually know it; I'm aware that just writing things phonetically doesn't translate all that well (though isn't that half the point of the thread?).
 
<Owen Glyndwr>
/o.wen glen.di&#633;/
(For those who don't know IPA: oh-when glen-deer)


<hobbsyoyo>
/hob.bis.syo/
(hob.bis.see-oh)


<joecoolyo>
/&#676;o.ko:l.yo/
(joe.cool.yo)


IPA isn't necessary per se, I suppose, but it really really helps a lot if you know it - opens up a lot of things. And it's actually not too difficult, at least for me.
 
<Owen Glyndwr>
/o.wen glen.di&#633;/
(For those who don't know IPA: oh-when glen-deer)


<hobbsyoyo>
/hob.bis.syo/
(hob.bis.see-oh)


<joecoolyo>
/&#676;o.ko:l.yo/
(joe.cool.yo)


IPA isn't necessary per se, I suppose, but it really really helps a lot if you know it - opens up a lot of things. And it's actually not too difficult, at least for me.

Few nitpicky things: /y/ is the high front rounded vowel (the u in the French j'ai lu). I assume that's not what you mean. The symbol you want is the palatal approximate (/j/). Do you really pronounce the cool segment of joe's name as a long o? My pronunciation is a bit closer to the straight /u/. And you pronounce the Glyn part of my name with a straight /e/? That's interesting.
 
Few nitpicky things: /y/ is the high front rounded vowel (the u in the French j'ai lu). I assume that's not what you mean. The symbol you want is the palatal approximate (/j/). Do you really pronounce the cool segment of joe's name as a long o? My pronunciation is a bit closer to the straight /u/.

Crap, you're right. I should know better especially since I've been conlanging for long enough (which is why I understand what you're saying ;) ) - guess that's what happens when you don't practice it or conlang a lot for a while. Yeah, that is supposed to be /j/ there, and that's supposed to be /u:/.

And you pronounce the Glyn part of my name with a straight /e/? That's interesting.

Yeah. Guess my brain just quickly read it as "Glen" rather than "Glyn" when I first came across it and it stuck.
 
How do you pronounce Ay in this context? /e&#618;/ or /a&#618;/

What about lead? /l&#603;d/ or /lid/ or maybe even /li&#601;d/

is hoo pronounced /hu/ or /ho&#650;/

/e&#618;li&#601;dhu/
 
Most people write meaningless gibberish when they try to describe pronounciation without it. [IPA]

Hmm. I'm not sure that IPA is such a significant advantage as people think. It is a better, and more formal, approximation to pronunciation than other systems, I will agree. But in the end it's still an arbitrary code that doesn't really explain how to move the myriad muscles necessary to form a particular sound (nor do I think such a thing would be possible). It still relies on a background knowledge of some human speech absolutely. As do all transcriptions.
 
But in the end it's still an arbitrary code that doesn't really explain how to move the myriad muscles necessary to form a particular sound (nor do I think such a thing would be possible).
It is arbitrary, sure. What isn't? But it's a mutually understood arbitrariness, where specific symbols denote specific pronunciations. Something like "O-win Glend-were" can have multiple potential interpretations; use IPA and that problem ceases to exist. Sure, then you have a new problem - learning IPA - but that's much easier than learning the idiosyncratic pronunciation preferences of every other individual in the world so you can understand their attempts at phonetic spelling. It's the same reason you measure things in liters, meters, and grams (or gallons, feet, and pounds), or indeed the same reason anybody uses any language at all, ever.
 
But the thing is that each symbol is pronounced the same in every single language. It is universal, and it is the value of universality that makes it so useful. If you pronounce a symbol differently than the person at your side, one of you is simply doing it wrong.

EDIT: :ninja:'d :mad:
 
Back
Top Bottom