I am a hypocrite - Elta on Illegal Immigration

Elta

我不会把这种
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Messages
7,590
Location
North Vegas
I was asked why I am against illegal immigration and would let a cousin of mine live at my house knowing that they are illegal :eek:

So here is my take on illegal immigration omnis totus.


It's common sense that any country in the world since the beginning of civilization would want to know and say who can and can not come into their country, just look at what happened to Rome when they had a few thousand Germans protect their border. ;)

You need to know who is dangerous who is not, who wants to do this or that etc etc.


How my family came to America: My Great Grand Father being the youngest of his brother and sisters intended to come to Argentina with his brothers in sisters in 1918. He was 17. As fate would have it he got on the wrong boat and ended up in New York :lol: Seeing as how there was a large Italian community there he felt at home and stayed. - The Irish side of my dads family came over in the great potato famine.


When my mom was 16 she came to the U.S. illegally when there were few illegals from Mexico and it was not illegal to hire an illegal.




So here is my opinion on the legality and morality of the issue.

I break the law all of the time, I speed 10 or 15 miles over the speed limit, I make rolling stops when I am the only one at an intersection, I drink and I am only 20, I smoke marijuana at a party every now and again too.

I can understand why this things are illegal ( more or less on the bud and alcohol age limit) They can all be very dangerous if done the wrong way. ...... sex too for that matter.

I know my family, I know what would happen if they were caught. Just as I know what would happen if I were caught speeding.

It would be hypocritical for me the son of a former illegal immigrant to say "oh they are all criminals! Hang em!" or something like that.

We have 3 million jobs on both sides of the border that depend on the trade between Mexico and the U.S. so to say something like " oh we should just put land-mines on the border" or something like would not only screw up our economy would be against some sort of human rights law I am sure.


I am not one to say that it would be impossible to deport 10 million + people but, I would say that it would be impractically expensive and not beneficially to the people. Just like we could manage to put 1 million men in Iraq within 3 years if we really wanted too. ....... it would probably bankrupt us ( both proposals )


It would be much easier to legalize the people here and protect the border properly.

The only people who can enforce border security properly is border patrol and the Coast Guard. So why not increase funding for BP by 10X if they want to build a wall let them do it. AFAIK they have built walls where they thought
it was nescassary. If they don't they stick to their helicopter-truck combo.

Does anyone here oppose to raising border patrols funding by a substantial amount?

What about Immigration and Customs Enforcement? They are the only ones allowed to do work place raids and there are only a few thousand of them on that part of the job. What a joke!! And what of these dangerous products coming from China? we need more ICE so they can enforce the rules at the ports.
and not to mention in China proper (as well as other places we get products from that tend to be dangerous)

Is anyone here against giving ICE a substantially higher amount of funding?


The effect of illegals has been nil to good on the economy .... well that is if we can trust someone like Jericohill's opinion on the subject.

And the number of illegals in jail is nothing more than a result of people getting jailed for being illegal.




I know every GOP candidate jumped on Huckabee when he said that he felt that a lot of *this was motivated by sheer racism but, it is.

*anti illegal fervor



Think of this for just a minute England or Ireland goes through a horrible depression and a lot of people are coming from there ( and there are no migrants from Asia or Latin America atm) No one would give a crap - here is why.

1. They are White ( most of them)
2. They speak English ( most of them)
3. They have at least a 12 year education ( most of them)

I seriously doubt 1/4th as many people would care and you know what they would work for less than Americans would.

1. Needs no explanation, it's out and out racism

2. I don't why everyone seems to think migrants never learn English or something to that end but, the stats are like this. ( taken from a training program I had to become a ESL teacher's assistant ) For people born from 2 Mexican parents in America

95% prefer to speak English among their friends who are also from Mexican parents and 85% of them can Speak Spanish.

The children of these kids
100% prefer English
5% speak Spanish as a second language.

So much for OH NOES TEH MONTREAL !!!!!11!

All of this "Won't adapt to western culture" stuff is nonsense I deify you to find me one Anthropology professor at any 4 year college in America who thinks Mexico is not a western country. Asian kids seem to fit in just fine as well.

3. is a given 90% of people between the ages of 20 and 40 in Mexico have a 8 year education. And less than 50% have 12 year education and the ones who do will probably not come here in such numbers because they are well off. Even if they did all have 12 year educations, they would still work for less. The poor tend to do that every where.



The issue of letting the highly educated come first is a bad idea for 2 reasons. The poor are the ones who would be coming here in numbers anyway and if the educated leave it will only exacerbate the problem in Mexico giving them the Braindrain effect.


All in all if the Economist is right ( the magazine ) and Mexico's GDP per person goes up to 50% of the U.S.'s in 25 years. ( at the pace it's on ). Then
the migrant rate (legal or illegal) will slow down to double the % of Canadas immigration to the U.S.( which is super low .

Think about it - If the money at home is worth 4 times more and you get a decent job in lets say construction for 10 buck an hour and your take home is 9 per hour. You can share a 1 bedroom apartment with 2 other guys and send home 3 bucks an hours worth ( about 6k a year ) and your family back home will do all right.

You can live off of 6k a year in Mexico ( 80% of places ) you can't live off of 3k any where ( not with a wife and 2 kids any way - at most you could live alone in the deep south with 3k)

So when Mexico's GDP gets within half of ours the rate of illegal immigration
will be a trickle.

Thats my take on Illegal immigration from Mexico in particular.

To be honest Illegal immigration from every where else doesn't bother me either unless it is from a place that produces a lot of anti American terrorist
and has super strict religious fanatics.

I realize that I live in a global economy and I don't whine about it. I am fully prepared to compete against anyone for a job. Whether they live in Calcutta or come from Manzanillo. + it is perposterous to claim to have free trade with a country and not have free movement of workers, El mano de oro* is a commodity.

* The hand of gold - Latin American slang for a hard worker.


Props if you read the whole thing - it took me a while and it is all my original thought. Nothing was copy - pasted.
 
Well, this was pretty long and winded, not sure it was coherent, but it does pretty damn well sum up my opinions on the subject as well.

People moan and whine about lack of free trade, then moan and whine some more when people move freely to benefit from said "free trade".
 
Think of this for just a minute England or Ireland goes through a horrible depression and a lot of people are coming from there ( and there are no migrants from Asia or Latin America atm) No one would give a crap - here is why.

1. They are White ( most of them)
2. They speak English ( most of them)
3. They have at least a 12 year education ( most of them)

What matters to me is if they pay taxes (more than just sales tax!).
 
What matters to me is if they pay taxes (more than just sales tax!).

Everyone pays taxes - low income people love to pay taxes - they allways get money back :mischief: :mischief:


If you do manage to build up a decent income you have to do it to because when they finally do get around to arresting you you can say "oh but, I pay taxes!" And many do manage not to get deported if they have been paying taxes for a long time and have a kid here or something like that. At the very least they give you time to sell your property before they kick you out.

Every Illegal I know pays taxes, there is a clear incentive in it.
 
Wait is you of pure European decent enven though your family has lived in South America for a long time?.

Not really - my moms side is Austrian-Spanish. We don't look all that Meztizo but, I like to think there is some native blood in there :king:

I say threatning a countries culture and way of life is a serious crime./QUOTE]
:confused: I don't know if illegal immigration does all that but, it is a misdemeanor. I suppose it would need to be a Felony to be called serious crime. So in that case no it's not serious to us.
 
Hate to disappoint you, Elta, but I want illegal Brits out of the country as much as illegal Mexicans. It is -not- about racism, but is about the law and our nation's sovereignity.

Nobody who has ever shown our nation so much disrespect as to enter illegally should ever be allowed in legally. Find them, register them, and kick them out.
 
Hate to disappoint you, Elta, but I want illegal Brits out of the country as much as illegal Mexicans. It is -not- about racism, but is about the law and our nation's sovereignity.

Nobody who has ever shown our nation so much disrespect as to enter illegally should ever be allowed in legally. Find them, register them, and kick them out.

All 10 million of them with 1,000 or so ICE agents?

Doubtski ......

So are okay with being taxed more so we can expand ICE up to like say 50,000 ICE agents? Thats the number Newt Gingrich has been harping about on all of the radio shows.

I for one would be for it - you?

* Side note: it is completely unrealistic in every way to think that 1,000 agents could work fast enough to take care of 10 million illegals. it's would be like having 10,000 guys in Iraq.

I have no problem with the rule of law being enforced - I would just like real solutions. No wall is going to track process and deport people. At the same rate border patrol knows where they do and don't need a wall, it's their job to protect it. If they need one in particular places they will build it, they just need the funding, much more funding.
 
If it is necessary, yes, we should create a seperate militarized component similiar to the coast guard, let us call them the border guards. 100,000 - 150,000 ought to do it, I think. That should take care of the borders themselves.

Then, to deal with the illegals currently in country, we need to make the punishment for knowingly hiring an illegal ruinous. We need to make the punishment for making false IDs for illegals ruinous as well. Let the local authorities hand over illegals to ICE, and concentrate ICE personnel in those stupid "sanctuary cities" that don't seem to care.

Oh, and get started on that Brownsville to San Diego canal. ;)

IN short, I do not accept that we cannot do anything to find and deport the illegals currently in the country.
 
If it is necessary, yes, we should create a seperate militarized component similiar to the coast guard, let us call them the border guards. 100,000 - 150,000 ought to do it, I think. That should take care of the borders themselves.

Then, to deal with the illegals currently in country, we need to make the punishment for knowingly hiring an illegal ruinous. We need to make the punishment for making false IDs for illegals ruinous as well. Let the local authorities hand over illegals to ICE, and concentrate ICE personnel in those stupid "sanctuary cities" that don't seem to care.

Oh, and get started on that Brownsville to San Diego canal. ;)

IN short, I do not accept that we cannot do anything to find and deport the illegals currently in the country.

I don't either - I just don't want to foot the unnecessary bill. Just like I think if we put another 120,000 troops in Iraq and stayed there for a generation we could stabiles the country enough to slowly pull out in another 20 after that and they would be okay.

I just don't want to pay for that either. On the same token it's cheaper to have someone in prison for 75 years than to execute them. ( due to the massive cost of the trial) Thats why I am oppose to executing.

Not to mention the whole tracking people down because their existence in an area is forbidden thing reminds me of Anne Frank and it gives me the big brother hibby gibbys.


* I am going to bed, I'll respond when I get up ;)
 
Not to mention the whole tracking people down because their existence in an area is forbidden thing reminds me of Anne Frank and it gives me the big brother hibby gibbys.

I must step in to play referee here, but I'll probably come back to the thread to look at the different viewpoints.

The Nazis were invading on Dutch land and had a policy of rounding up all people of certain extractions to carry out a genocide. Quite different than agents finding people that entered the country without going through the proper channels.

I suppose it doesn't help that I don't buy the usual statement I see/hear that these are people living in the "shadows." I agree with the premise that getting rid of ten or twenty million is nigh impossible and likely not even in our best interests, but let's at least call everything as it is.
 
I do kind of see Elta's point, though. But unfortunately, that's the situation we're in because all past administrations have failed to do squat about illegal aliens.

Oh..wait...I have a picture that fits here... :D

clinton-ELIAN-1.jpg
 
I must step in to play referee here, but I'll probably come back to the thread to look at the different viewpoints.

The Nazis were invading on Dutch land and had a policy of rounding up all people of certain extractions to carry out a genocide. Quite different than agents finding people that entered the country without going through the proper channels.

I suppose it doesn't help that I don't buy the usual statement I see/hear that these are people living in the "shadows." I agree with the premise that getting rid of ten or twenty million is nigh impossible and likely not even in our best interests, but let's at least call everything as it is.

I know it's different, it just that the process of getting people and kicking them out because "people a are illegal and people b are okay" sounds like some half breed whole breed harry potter stuff.


* I just got an automated phone call saying that all 3 of my scholarships were approved, I don't think I am gonna sleep tonight :D - I won't be able to, I have the christmas eve as a kid feeling. I am going straight to school to see how much they are for. right when they open :D
 
* I just got an automated phone call saying that all 3 of my scholarships were approved, I don't think I am gonna sleep tonight :D - I won't be able to, I have the christmas eve as a kid feeling. I am going straight to school to see how much they are for. right when they open :D

Tonight? It's 5:30 AM in Vegas! Your night has about 45 minutes left. :lol:

Oh, and congratulations.
 
I do kind of see Elta's point, though. But unfortunately, that's the situation we're in because all past administrations have failed to do squat about illegal aliens.

Oh..wait...I have a picture that fits here... :D

clinton-ELIAN-1.jpg

And when Regan legalized the last bunch ( in what was it 86-87? ) Everyone was under the impression that we would get more enforcement.

If we could get a lot more enforcement along with a legalization act then I think we could get something done. As it stands now the democrats and the republicans are just going to filabuster each other to death and nothing will get done. Then again that is normal washinton. :(
 
Tonight? It's 5:30 AM in Vegas! Your night has about 45 minutes left. :lol:

Allmost every job I've has has been from the afternoon till about midnight, I come home kick back and then I go to bed when the sun comes out. People in Vegas don't even go "out" until around 11 at night and clubs ussually close at 5 am. I've kind of gotten used to sleeping when I see the sun :crazyeye: :lol:
 
I'm just happy that you used the word hypocrite. Some people around this forum can't seem to come to grips that they are hypocrites, and seem to think that it's a dirty word.

People moan and whine about lack of free trade, then moan and whine some more when people move freely to benefit from said "free trade". - dawgphood

Once you get rid of the minimum wage for American's, that'll become an argument. As it stands, illegal immigrants represent nothing more than slave class. It's pure labor exploitation. And look what side of the isle is advocating it. Of course, Democrats and liberals will bemoan labor exploitation over seas. And it's fashionable to condemn corporations in that light. But for some mysterious reason, they don't condemn labor exploitation within our own country. Gee. I wonder why that is? Oh yeah, they want these people to vote...
 
I do kind of see Elta's point, though. But unfortunately, that's the situation we're in because all past administrations have failed to do squat about illegal aliens.
The Clinton administration was going after the employers of illegals - thousands of enforcement actions over his 8 years. One year, the Bush administration only initiated like 3 or 4 enforcement actions against employers.
 
Back
Top Bottom