If it was one or the other

See post below

  • Internet

    Votes: 37 69.8%
  • Library

    Votes: 16 30.2%

  • Total voters
    53

Elta

我不会把这种
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Messages
7,590
Location
North Vegas
If it was between using the public library (books only) or the internet to get your information which would you pick.?







Just wondering I go to Borders every pay check and buy a book ussually and it is never a novel (unless it's a manga)
when I see stuff like this
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060626/ap_en_ce/people_harper_lee_oprah
"Now, 75 years later in an abundant society where people have laptops, cell phones, iPods, and minds like empty rooms, I still plod along with books," she writes.
"You know what was good about the movie ... no reading."
I hate to see them ruin reading for kids with novels give them some naruto graphic novels with 10 times less words in it and I'd bet they would read 10 times more (and be willing).
 
I Wubs Wikipedia!
 
I'd have to say books. The interweb lies to much.
 
Perfection said:
Does it have to be a public library, what about a university library?
It depends if it is a state university where they let the public use it or not (like UNLV)
since the artical was about how she was poor and what not.
(I know that probably doesn't make any sense to you but just roll with it I guess :king: pretend your as crazy as me)
 
Internet. It's convenient, and the public library here is awful. It probably has more paperback dime romance novels than legitimate works of literature.
 
I really like books and have quite a few, but for quick access to a broad range of topics the internet wins hands down. I'd be hard pressed to give up my collection of old atlases or books on Napoleon. I didn't vote.
 
I'm a books fan, ok sure I could go online and find 1000 pieces of text on the rise of the Persian Empire and their war with the Greek City States, but I'd must rather go buy a book. I read books to relax as well as increase my knowledge. You can't really do both of those things by staring at a computer screen
 
Bright day
Well seeing as I live in capital of my country so you would dozens of small township libraries into municipal main. AND I have easy acces to national library. Well books then, cross-referencable information, written by somebody.
 
Library, cause there's propably some hot bookworm there.

In internet, the person behind those feminine's nickname are most propably guys. In additional to that, not all information available are trustworthy, including wikipedia.
 
I said internet since it has pretty much has become my all-around media source (tv, radio, console system). But books have better developed ideas, are generally more throughly researched, and have been edited and reedited for accuracy and grammar mistakes so their ideas or points last with you longer.
 
Books. I love all aspects of them, revering words and their power. They have their individual texture and aroma. They are a shared experience, particularly if from a good library.

Sadly, all of the libraries I am a member of went through a process of 'rationalizing' their stock, resulting in wholesale pulpings and disposals. It was like a part of my soulstuff was ripped out, trampled and thrown upon the flames of ignorance and convenience; a visceral pain and anger.

It is a very different feeling giving a young boy or girl a book you read and loved as a child - a world changing and defining experience - than it is simply giving them directions to a pale and vapid website that it, by its nature, transitory. Both lead to a shared knowledge, understanding and experience, but the former is far preferable, far more special.
 
As far as information is concerned and since many books can be found in ebook form, I'll have to go with the internet. But libraries and physical books have a special appeal that the internet will never have.
 
Back
Top Bottom