yung.carl.jung
Hey Bird! I'm Morose & Lugubrious
No one 'holds out'. They do the best they can and then upgrade when they can afford it.
not everyone upgrades, though. just almost everyone, the loud majority.
No one 'holds out'. They do the best they can and then upgrade when they can afford it.
not everyone upgrades, though. just almost everyone, the loud majority.
If we want to avoid the fate of Valka's forgetful Dr. Who reference we gotta beef up the brain, and to do that you gotta start understanding the human mind in a very nuts and bolts manner. And we start messing around up there, we're gonna quickly figure out that anything you can do to a program, will be something you can do the mind. Copy minds, merge them, store them untouched on the shelf for 30 years, run them on faster or slower computers, interface them with lord knows what.
Consequently everything we know about morality will have to be fundamentally rethought.
Sounds pretty fanciful. Minds are not something we understand pretty much at all and fundamentally different from computer programs which are static in structure.If we want to avoid the fate of Valka's forgetful Dr. Who reference we gotta beef up the brain, and to do that you gotta start understanding the human mind in a very nuts and bolts manner. And we start messing around up there, we're gonna quickly figure out that anything you can do to a program, will be something you can do the mind. Copy minds, merge them, store them untouched on the shelf for 30 years, run them on faster or slower computers, interface them with lord knows what.
Consequently everything we know about morality will have to be fundamentally rethought.
Consequently everything we know about morality will have to be fundamentally rethought.
A "mind" in isolation from an organism might not be possible.
double upvoteThe second law of thermodynamics dictates heat death will catch up to us. But this doesn't prevent us from resisting our own entropy for an extremely long time by foisting it elsewhere, until there is no elsewhere.
Usually people would just call this immortality rather than "almost immortality until billions/trillions of years from now" because it's simpler (and almost nobody would last that long without some fluke accident given the non-magic immortality variant), but it's true that not even 10 trillion years is "forever".
Colloquially, there are at least two main types of immortality in story telling: god-like immortality where you magically never die never ever and regular immortality where you can still die of non-natural causes.Well, we've not ruled out that it's infinite in size. Obviously, that's the best we can do.
But it's not infinite in time, from any practical standpoint. Or, at least, that's the current suggestion. I will admit that it's a potential roadblock for true immortality. But, there also seems to be closer problems that deserve attention.
I'm in the strong camp of 'we should push back the damages of aging' when it comes to wanting medical progress. I'm technically an immortalist, but only in a way that doesn't mean much. I think that involuntary death is a problem worth tackling.
I *think* we don't yet know what shape of the universe is with a lot of certainty. I believe this means there is a possibility you could travel in a straight line and come back to where you started. I'm struggling to remember and I believe that the evidence leans in the direction that the universe is flat in that you'll never come back where you started but scientists don't have definitive proof yet.Hmm you're right, though in practice unless we break FTL somehow what any theoretically immortal human being could access is finite regardless of the fact that in principle you could travel in a straight line and get further away from where you started forever.
How similar to today do you expect 2889 CE to be anyway?
actually human immortality is pretty much pointless if they destroy and not equally obsessed on immortalizing their living platform (planet Earth).
Would be true if we were talking about billions of immortals. Of course such won't ever happen
Soooooo only a selected bourgeois who going to enjoy the immortality? after that they pretty much control the reproduction of human under right surveillance, and creates human into classes and strictly defined role, and whoever goes out of the line will be terminated. (sound like a film I watch long time ago)
It's seems like we regress collectively as a social being while advance technologically.
I don't see any of these problems as anything but a variant of a problem that already exists. We already need those solutions.
I love this thought. Along a similar vein, when I'd take a new friend to my favorite hiking spot in southern Illinois, I loved pointing out fossils embedded in the cliffs of the bluffs we hiked that were older than even the concept of god.Up to now humans just don't live long enough to outlive ideas.