I think we basically agree then. An accident is an accident, something on purpose is something on purpose. Whether something was an accident, or on purpose, matters since someone shouldn't be held responsible for accidents, even if they were a result of their decision. That is all I mean when I say intentions do sometimes matter.
I specifically said "unpredictable event," not "accident." Accidents are generally predictable.
I specifically said "unpredictable event," not "accident." Accidents are generally predictable.
In a general sense. Put a bunch of cars on the road it is not only predictable but certain that some of them will be running into each other. But the accidents are still unpredicatable events.
I really don't agree with this in the context of cars. Almost every single car accident has a discrete cause of someone not doing something they're supposed to be doing, or doing something they're not supposed to be doing. I can tell you for example that every car crash I've been in was entirely my fault and was the predictable consequence of my negligent actions (not paying proper attention to the road, driving too fast to stop in time given the distance to the car ahead, etc).
For the record, despite a very long career of doing irresponsible things while driving cars, the last accident I was in happened while I was genuinely doing everything right. Not speeding. No distractions. No known malfunctions in the car being ignored. No chemical impairments or lack of sleep. Zip. Nada. Just driving along and whammo.
This was the other driver's fault, then, I take it?
Intentions are important, but bad results almost always provide opportunities for good acts.
If you were aware of the two clearly different meanings here, bravo. If not, then it is unintentional and even though it is still hilarious I cannot give you any credit for it.
What are the two different meanings? Asking for a friend.