Intermittent fasting is the Chuck Norris of preventative medicine

AFAIK, at any given time your body is breaking down any number of different things for fuel. Granted I haven't studied this in depth but I was under the impression that when one fasted for more than a day or two glycogen was the primary fuel, not muscle tissue.
Glycogen is the primary fuel for short-term fasting. That's anything from 30 minutes onwards. Glycogen will run out very quickly, and your body will start to metabolise fat stores. Fat takes some effort to mobilise and process, and so your body supplements it with protein, which is mostly taken from the muscle. To start with it's taken from muscle protein stores, which are there as an energy reserve, but rapidly from break-down of muscle itself.
Humans are also opportunistic scavengers. ;)
But more likely to hunt? I can hardly imagine a crowd of mice with arrows and spears.
Are you sure about your 14 hour = most of fuel comes from break down of muscle tissue? Cause if that's true that this regime would totally screw up ones body but I'm not sure you have it quite right.
I never said most. Most would still come from fat, but there is significant loss of muscle mass after this point.

Perhaps. I'm skeptical that scientists will be able to find a little pill to mimic the full effects of frugal eating though. Likely, like exercise, it is too complex a process to mimick with a single chemical (or batch of chemicals).
I doubt that scientists would want to mimic all the effects of frugal eating. Whereas the only problems with exercise are wear on muscles and joints, frugal eating can lead to this and more.
If frugal eating has its effects on stress, as appears likely, we would do better to find ways to reduce stress specifically.
Well, it seems intuitive that the more we make our body work (process things) the faster it's going to break down. The more oxygen we breathe (rapid heartrate, rapid breathing), the more food we eat, the more stressed we are and fast paced our lifestyle is in general I'd imagine the more likely we're going to die prematurely.
Heart rate and O2 consumption are not that well-linked, and nor is rapid breathing and O2 consumption. Your resting O2 levels are high enough that rapid breathing makes pretty much no difference. High cardiac output (which isn't the same as HR) and ventilation may be symptoms of stress, but are not causes.
Barring, of course, the solid but small body of evidence that says that yogic breathing and similar slow-breathing techniques can help to reduce stress levels and control things such as hypertension. But that's an artificial imposition on an otherwise normal system.

As for exercise. Well exercise lowers our resting heart rate and makes our body more relaxed the 80-90% of the time we're not actively working out (as well as accelerated detoxification and improving mood, thus lowering mental/emotional stress/tension/overwork) so actually it still fits into my theory.
Resting HR isn't very important as a measure, as long as it's vaguely normal. Things like recovery time of resting HR after exercise are better measures.
 
Brighteye said:
I can hardly imagine a crowd of mice with arrows and spears.
Heh, I'd like to see an image of that in funny pics. :D

Brighteye said:
But that's an artificial imposition on an otherwise normal system.
Perhaps. But I'd imagine sitting in an office chair all day and locamoting oneself with one foot (car) are equally "artificial" from an evolutionary perspective.

So, if we're gonna do artificial things to try to stay healthier, might as well do the right ones (not saying office chairs and cars are universally bad just that the overuse of them at the expense of alternatives probably will have negative health consequences, mostly related to, but not limited to, ones muscles, bones & joints).
 
What I meant by artificial imposition is that just because slow breathing affects the body fast breathing doesn't necessarily cause the opposite.
It probably doesn't.
 
I don't know. Fast breathing is generally correlated with anxiety. Which isn't really good for you.
 
But fast breathing doesn't cause anxiety. Whereas slow breathing reduces stress signals, although people rarely breathe very slowly without training.
 
Back
Top Bottom