Is Britain about to leave the EU?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Things get more interesting by the day.
Brexit transitional deal will lock UK into EU court, says Verhofstadt

Exclusive:
EU negotiator suggests Brussels does not plan to let Theresa May keep promises to leave ECJ’s jurisdiction in 2019​

So it is not just the UK Remoaners, it is now the EU that think that they can cherry pick
Brexit what with the ECJ overrule remaining and £49 billion pounds net UK contribution.

The danger is that the Europeans will talk themselves up into believing all this,
which will likely merely result in a clean Brexit without any agreement at all.
 
Verhofstadt is an idiot and a troll anyway. Is he named as negotiator? LOL. Speaks volumes on what is going on.

guy.jpg


Where do they even find those specimens..
 
£49bn? Where does that number come from?
 
There will be nothing clean at all about Brexit if no deal is reached.
 
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...s-for-united-ireland-provision-in-brexit-deal
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/fa0453c224b71692fe3114c2b29fb8f1d100200c/597_47_5810_3486/master/5810.jpg?w=1225&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=f6faf29123c898456dfdba6f12deec4b/[IMG]

[QUOTE]Ireland wants a special provision in any Brexit deal to allow [URL='https://www.theguardian.com/uk/northernireland']Northern Ireland[/URL] to rejoin the EU should it be united with the Republic.

The taoiseach, [URL='https://www.theguardian.com/world/enda-kenny']Enda Kenny[/URL], said in Brussels that the deal between the EU and the UK should include language that would allow the north to easily return to the bloc.

Kenny said the provisions that allowed East Germany to join West Germany and the EU “in a seamless fashion” after the fall of the Berlin wall offered a precedent.[\QUOTE]
Stirring a bit of nationalism into the pot.[/QUOTE][/IMG]
 
If Northern Ireland rejoins Eire, why wouldn't it rejoin the EU by default?
 
If it ever happens - it could happen in various different ways.

Imagine a new federal structure with the south having been in the EU the whole time and having appropriate laws and bodies etc. And the north having been out of the EU long enough that laws and bodies have diverged.

The non EU north could continue to exist in a federal structure.

Other than German reunification I don't think there have been similar mergers for the EU to deal with.
 
Yesterday I heard a massive wall of criticism against the European Union and since I don't know much about the EU, I couldn't say anything against it. What little that I've been told here I did try to say, but they told me that I was wrong and they had evidence why, while keep going on about how they are rational, unbiased and completely logical and how everything about the EU is a nonsense. Their idea for leaving the EU seems to be in their words either a complete divorce from the EU or the EU itself should be completely dismantled. The idea that anyone would want to join the EU seems completely absurd to them and they have no idea why countries like the Czech Republic decided to join after the fall of the Soviet Union, since it seems to them like trading once communist regime for another.

The first thing, they said that the European Union is in fact more like a cult, comparing it to Scientology, that lies to gullible people with false promises and only exists to steal money. The EU exists solely for itself, just like a bureaucracy.

They asked me what is the true purpose of the EU. I mentioned things about trying to prevent another World War and the idea of federalism, but they said that those are only myths.

The EU solely exists as a group of middle management types with far too much power and the EU exists without any kind of checks and balances to help limit any power they wield over the member nations.

The EU can force a law upon any nation even if that nation doesn't agree with that law, the example they brought up is the free movement of people.

The EU take forever in trying to make decisions, the example they give is that the EU still hasn't guaranteed freedom of speech. I did mention the European Convention of Human Rights but they are against that.

The EU isn't democratic since only the European Parliament is elected.

The idea that the EU helps economic growth is a myth. When the UK joined the EU, it helped to ruin the UK economy and many businesses have failed because of the EU.

Any trade deals or economic growth that has happened in the past forty years would've have been better if done by the UK itself and not through the EU.

The EU suffers from the same problem as liberalism, it likes to celebrate diversity by forcing everyone to be the same.

The EU goes against the will of the people of the member nations. There are far too many different people within the EU that it's impossible for it to work as a united government. They backed that up by saying for example the Romanian government works because it only represents the Romanian people. This is shown by the growth of reactionary movements against the EU, such as what has happened in Hungary.

If the EU does try to improve the member nations its only by doing things that have already been done, such as building a road where a road already exists.

I mentioned the problem with the Irish border. Their solution is that the Republic of Ireland should also leave the EU and rejoin the UK.
 
Czech was logical in wanting to join the EU when it did. Yet the EU became an irreversible failure with the massive 2003 expansion. It paved the road for what the EU is now, namely a satellite and client-state system, currently dominated by Germany. This is negative also due to it being ridiculous to have crippling austerity imposed on you by politicians you (in your country) would never have elected, so it is anti-democracy. This is not the basis for a union of anything, let alone a community of different countries. Pre 2003 the dynamics were far more allowing for such a thing, though the corruption was already there.
Furthemore, most of the new countries that joined are not similar to the societies of the old countries, ie they are way more reactionary, zenophobic and all-around closed-up. Example being most of the former Austria-Hungary ones (afaik not Czechia), and most of the baltic ones.
 
The EU isn't democratic since only the European Parliament is elected.
I always find funny when euroskeptics say that, being precisely the parlament the most europeist instituion of all EU institutions.

Anyway, how is the EU not democratic because only the parlament is elected? Do people directly elect every single statal institution in UK? AFAIK they only elect their parlament, which elect the prime minister, which appoints his ministers and so on...
 
Last edited:
@really

If Northern Ireland (NI) votes to stay in the UK, that issue does not arise.

If NI votes to rejoin Eire, that measure would be useful but not essential, but it would be of little concern to Britain.

It is possible (although rather unlikely) that NI might vote to leave the UK, but fail to vote for the terms of joining
Eire, in which case that measure might preclude NI from independently joining the European Union (EU).


@Chukchi Husky

There is little point in seriously debating with people who are merely agreeing with themselves (whether anti or pro EU).

A line I'd suggest is to look them straight in the face, put on your saddest look and say;

"But the thing is I was so looking forward to eating square bananas!"
 
hat little that I've been told here I did try to say, but they told me that I was wrong and they had evidence why, while keep going on about how they are rational, unbiased and completely logical and how everything about the EU is a nonsense.
Spoiler :
photo.jpg
 
'Solely', 'absolutely', 'exclusively' and such are adverbs that automatically make an argument suspicious.
 
Anyway, how is the EU not democratic because only the parlament is elected? Do people directly elect every single statal institution in UK? AFAIK they only elect their parlament, which elect the prime minister, which appoints his ministers and so on...

I don't know. I don't really want to ask them. I assume it's because everything ultimately comes from the elected parliament, but I don't know. One thing I do know, they were highly against the voting of police commissioners that was introduced a few years ago, they said it was an example of the left wanting to ruin the country with needless bureaucracy and why people are stupid for voting for the Liberal Democrats.

@reallyThere is little point in seriously debating with people who are merely agreeing with themselves (whether anti or pro EU).

A line I'd suggest is to look them straight in the face, put on your saddest look and say;

"But the thing is I was so looking forward to eating square bananas!"

Normally I try to avoid saying anything that might bring that up with them. This time how it came up was after I tried to explain to them the basics of how the American government works.

The only thing that I've said about the EU that they do agree upon is that if Britain wanted to leave so much, it would probably be better for the EU and Britain if that happened. Another thing I did say that they seemed to agree is that after leaving the EU and nothing much changes, then the problem wasn't with the EU.

Ha ha, what?

They're younger than me. I have memories of hearing about The Troubles on the News, but I don't know how much they know about that. They were dismissive of the Good Friday Agreement though.

Well, at least the UK wouldn't pester Ireland about taxing Apple and closing loopholes.

That is one thing they do agree with, that Apple should be taxed. Then again, I had heard what they consider the best kind of tax system.
 
They're younger than me. I have memories of hearing about The Troubles on the News, but I don't know how much they know about that. They were dismissive of the Good Friday Agreement though.
This isn't just failing to appreciate the gravity of the Troubles, though, it's a fundamental failure to understand the course of Anglo-Irish relations since at least the 1880s. These guys don't even seem to have any inkling as to how or why Ireland became an independent country, but they fancy that they're in a position to rule on whether it should continue as such? That's some serious Dunning-Kruger stuff.

That is one thing they do agree with, that Apple should be taxed. Then again, I had heard what they consider the best kind of tax system.
Based on what I've heard of these guys, I'm going to guess it involves feeding your first-born to the minotaur. :crazyeye:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom