Itunes or Media Player?

[BCLG100]

well depends how he defined rock but its more than 5 days by normal definitions.

 

[The 777 Hoax]

What is it you don't like about iTunes?

I don't think it's as easy to use as Media Player is.

 

[oagersnap]

I don't think it's as easy to use as Media Player is.

It is IMHO.

 

[Chukchi Husky]

well depends how he defined rock but its more than 5 days by normal definitions.

I don't know, basically everything with a guitar I guess. He also says that he is God and attempts to prove it at every possible chance.

 

[Narz]

I don't know, basically everything with a guitar I guess. He also says that he is God and attempts to prove it at every possible chance.

Has he convinced you?

 

[bhsup]

I use iTunes to listen to BSG podcasts
I use WMP for most multimedia movies
I use MusicMatch for listening to music

I have no idea how to vote in this poll.

 

[I am the Future]

I feel bad. This thread has convinced me to try WinAmp. And I like it.

 

[GinandTonic]

I feel bad. This thread has convinced me to try WinAmp. And I like it.

Thats ok, welcome to the one true path.

 

[I am the Future]

Thats ok, welcome to the one true path.

Thank you for the support.............

 

[GrandAdmiral]

I don't like iTunes but its inconvinient not to use it if you have an ipod. The only reason iTunes seems easier to use is because it has less features in regards to videos and dvds. WMP is good for people that want to use 1 player for all forms of multimedia playback as well as managing an mp3 player. If it were my choice I would ditch both WMP and iTunes and use zoomplayer for video and winamp for audio. My vote goes to Windows Media Player because iTunes is a redundant piece of software.

 

[Grisu]

can't chose between lucifer and satan

nah, really, I never liked any of those two, I stick with WinAMP and so far am very satisfied with it

 

[funxus]

I don't like iTunes but its inconvinient not to use it if you have an ipod. The only reason iTunes seems easier to use is because it has less features in regards to videos and dvds. WMP is good for people that want to use 1 player for all forms of multimedia playback as well as managing an mp3 player. If it were my choice I would ditch both WMP and iTunes and use zoomplayer for video and winamp for audio. My vote goes to Windows Media Player because iTunes is a redundant piece of software.

But WMP is really bad for playing videos. Half the time I try playing a video-file in WMP (fileformat is connected to it), it says something's wrong, then I drag the file to VLC and the whole thing works like a charm. I rather have two very good softwares for different purposes than one crappy for both of them...

 

[kristopherb]

itunes ;why idont know

 

[aneeshm]

VLC rules completely!

 

[The Last Conformist]

I use WinAmp, and I thought everyone did.

Same here.

 

[GenMarshall]

Where is the both option? I use both programs equaly .

 

[Strider]

iTunes and Windows Media Player both really suck. Their memory hogs (espicially iTunes.. WMP isn't really bad). iTunes I can see people using because of their iPod, but I'm surprised anyone uses WMP. They both just really suck.

 

[mangxema]

iTunes is the only apple product I use, and that's one too many, but I just like it so much. [/shame]

Me too. It is handy. If they ever charged me for it, though, I would ditch it immediately.

I'm currently experimenting with Media Monkey (seems vaguely Amarokian, though I have very limited exposure to Amarok), and could probably replace iTunes, if MM could do last.fm.

 

[Harald]

I use Winamp for audio files and VLC for video.

 

[Underseer]

WinAmp is great, but I confess I was mostly using WMP out of pure laziness.

WMP 11 for Windows XP is a steaming load of crap though. In addition to possibly screwing up your digital media licenses, it can cause severe performance problems.