Itunes or Media Player?

[Red Door]

iTunes, even though it sucks at life.

 

[mangxema]

I'm currently experimenting with Media Monkey (seems vaguely Amarokian, though I have very limited exposure to Amarok), and could probably replace iTunes, if MM could do last.fm.

Scratch that. Media Monkey can do last.fm.

 

[CaptainF]

iTunes is a rather fascist program.

It apparently wants to dominate and possibly supercede my computer.

 

[mangxema]

iTunes is a rather fascist program.

It apparently wants to dominate and possibly supercede my computer.

Yeah, I don't like how it it will rename files only if you let it rearrange all of your music files. Amarok and MM are much kinder in that respect.

 

[BirraImperial]

I use iTunes, because of my iPod.

 

[CaptainF]

A Question for iTunes users:

If you buy music from the iTunes store, is it possible to convert the files to another format and burn them onto CD's later?

 

[bigdog5994]

im not a hippy i use media player

 

[Grohan]

I use:
Winamp
DivX player
Media Player Classic
And sometimes even WMP

But I NEVER use iTunes because all players made by Apple suck.

 

[The Last Conformist]

Can anyone explain, BTW, why WMP is such a memory hog when Winamp hardly shows up in memory usage? Are they just evil incompetents at Richmond or what?

 

[Rossiya]

I use Media Centre.

 

[Sophie 378]

iTunes - it doesn't argue so much as all the previous things I've tried.

 

[Snoozy]

Eh, how could anyone use WMP? It has a horrible interface and is ugly as hell. iTunes however, has a nicer feel to it and doesn't look like crap.

Although iTunes is not that user-friendly on Windows, I still prefer it over WMP. The only other reason I would use WMP it to play videos, but I have Realplayer so thats not much of a problem.

 

[oagersnap]

I use iTunes, even though it takes up quite a lot of memory.
I'm used to it, and I agree with Snoozy; its interface is much better than WMP's.

 

[Godwynn]

Now I use Winamp!

 

[azzaman333]

WMP, purely because it is easy to use (IMO)