LGBT rampage

80 posts in and I'm the one to say it?

Terrorism.
Eh, the only people here who actually object to terrorism around here are you and Park, so it's not much of a surprise that it hasn't come up.
 
In their defence, they never called gay people "paedophiles". Physically and Psychological sick sure but not the P-word
Sure they have, at least with many of them. See the quotes I highlighted on page one for details.
 
It's called fake sympathy that comes with the qualifier that they totally had it coming.

I don't like this group and I don't pretend do, but I will go on record saying they don't deserve to be shot now or in the future.
 
The vast majority of "social conservatives" aren't homophobic, nor do they support or even condone such despicable hate groups. At least I would certainly hope that is the case.

Do they condone running in guns blazing? :rolleyes:

Again, this group isnt a hate group. Those calling it a hate group are the ones responsible for this shooting. Its basically incitement.
 
I think it's basically a hate group but I'm not implying that people should go shoot them. I also don't accept any blame for the shooting.
 
I think it's basically a hate group but I'm not implying that people should go shoot them. I also don't accept any blame for the shooting.

Stop calling them a hate group then and reserve that label for groups that genuinely deserve it.
 
Again, this group isnt a hate group. Those calling it a hate group are the ones responsible for this shooting. Its basically incitement.
Again, it obviously is a hate group except to those who are trying to rationalize and defend their despicable acts.

Again, that position is even forbidden in this forum, and rightfully so.
 
Which groups genuinely deserve such a description, Mobboss?
 
Again, it obviously is a hate group except to those who are trying to rationalize and defend their despicable acts.

Why don't you try advocating their position in this forum and see what happens?

This forum doesnt give you such freedom of speech.

Which groups genuinely deserve such a description, Mobboss?

Here's how I see it. All this group does is believe in the same biblical interpretation of the issue as say, the Catholic Church does (or a good number of other churches for that matter).

Is the Catholic Church a hate group?

No?

Then why is this group?

But to answer your question, I'd say the KKK is certainly a hate group. The Westboro Baptist Church crosses that line as well. The Family Research Council? Not so much.
 
Is the Catholic Church a hate group? No? Then why is this group?

Well, the Catholic Church has hardly covered itself in glory recently with the furore over paedophile priests, but I wasn't suggesting that they were.
 
Well, the Catholic Church has hardly covered itself in glory recently with the furore over paedophile priests, but I wasn't suggesting that they were. I was asking for whom you consider to be hate groups.

Asked and answered.
 
As I saw, ex post facto. :)
 
Is the Catholic Church a hate group?

No?



.

well they do have a history of being a hate group... they have spent the last couple of hundred years cleaning up their act... remains to be seen how far they go...
or maybe how far the many good Catholics go...
 
This forum doesnt give you such freedom of speech.
Does that mean you would do so if it wasn't an automatic ban?

So this really isn't really about "same-sex marriage" after all, as you and so many others continue to allege?
 
well they do have a history of being a hate group... they have spent the last couple of hundred years cleaning up their act... remains to be seen how far they go...
or maybe how far the many good Catholics go...

I'll agree the Catholic church has its history of violence, but that hasnt been the case in a long, long time.
 
Stop calling them a hate group then and reserve that label for groups that genuinely deserve it.

I contend that visceral disgust for homosexuals is their driving motivation and I think they're a non-violent hate group. So no, I won't stop.
 
Back
Top Bottom