aelf
Ashen One
Doesnt that remain to be seen in the Libyans case?
Only if there is a Libyan Jesus.
Doesnt that remain to be seen in the Libyans case?
Doesnt that remain to be seen in the Libyans case?
I see you conveniently forgot about all the other countries on that list. Proud of the other countries as well?Can't say I'm exactly embarrassed that the US holds less executions per-capita than Japan.
I see you conveniently forgot about all the other countries on that list. Proud to be in that group, are you?
This scumbag got to live normally after that for about 38 years and counting. The Lockerbie bomber has maybe a year and very probably much less to live, and not even normally given his condition.
Nice story, but whats your point? They both murdered people but because the latter was an American he was "doing justice" or "bringing freedom" so that's probably why the let him off. A pathetic excuse..
I know it is irrelevant and meaningless to you. And I bet you think most the rest of the world hates the US due to our freedom and liberty...Personally I don't care about what company we keep with regards to who does and doesn't perform the death penalty. What the rest of the world does or thinks about it is irrelevant and meaningless to me.
I never was for letting him off. The lockerbie bomber (supposedly) commited a vile offense and showed no remore. Why should we allow him to die the way he chooses when he sure as hell didn't show that courtesy to his victims?
I know it is irrelevant and meaningless to you. And I bet you think most the rest of the world hates the US due to our freedom and liberty...
Because an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
Right okay then, we'll let him out then, not just him, infact lets let out all the kiddy fiddlers and Scottish drug dealers eh then? Too show everyone how "Moral" we are. Great arguement.
You can try to dismiss your own personal opinions in this matter to "morality", and how you must be battling evil and stupid people who make up the "majority" which obviously disagree with your opinion in this matter, but you aren't fooling anybody but yourself. The day will soon come when it is an international crime to execute anybody for any reason whatsoever, much as what has happened with slavery or any other great crime against humanity. What will your excuse be then?Huh, I never knew morality was dictated by popularity.
This is plainly a strawman. Talk about great arguments.
Obviously, saying "Why should we allow him to die the way he chooses when he sure as hell didn't show that courtesy to his victims?" is not how the legal process is conducted, nor how justice is served. Do you go around asking "Why should we not rape this guy when he sure as hell raped his victims?", hmm? You don't do something to a criminal just because he did it to his victims. That's not justice in modern society, bro.
And regardless of whether the Scottish decision was right, there is a BIG difference between this case and that, so all the comments about this guy deserving death in prison "just like" the other guy are asinine. There is a fundamental difference between why one was released and why the other was, plus big differences in the circumstances surrounding their respective release.