Massive Humans vs Humans Game/Lets Player Tracker

Who do you think will win?

  • AstralPhaser

    Votes: 5 7.5%
  • Il Principe

    Votes: 2 3.0%
  • Koshling

    Votes: 14 20.9%
  • Hydromancerx

    Votes: 17 25.4%
  • Vokarya

    Votes: 4 6.0%
  • Acularius

    Votes: 3 4.5%
  • Thunderbrd

    Votes: 8 11.9%
  • ls612

    Votes: 5 7.5%
  • JosEPh_II

    Votes: 8 11.9%
  • Praetyre

    Votes: 1 1.5%
  • Epi3b1rD

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    67
I think destroy city is best... That way it's fair and we have less people to wait on. Maybe an auto kick after 1 week of it being a persons turn.

Does everyone agree?

The less people we have the faster this game will progress...

P.S how is everyone honestly feeling about this game?

A. It's lost it's fun, I hate checking in everyday and forgetting its my turn, I prefer single player and want to give up this game.
B. I like this multiplayer game and am having fun but I wish people were on time, I do however prefer single player.
C. This is funner than single player however its being hindered by player delays.
D. I love this setup and definitly don't want to stop playing it!

Me... I'd say I am between A and B right now. This game has too much upkeep to it and I don't like having to check in to see if its my turn all the time. If it was "live" multiplayer that would be much more fun.

Be honest, who wants to quit/start a better multiplayer game? If you did do that... I wouldn't be included.

P.P.S Don't take this as negativity, I'm just wanting to know your opinions right now on the status of this game.
 
I don't feel that his city will be any easier invaded than any barb city to come. AI him when it comes time if we don't have a player to take his place is my opinion.
 
Personally, I'd like the game to continue, but preferably at a faster pace. My interest level is still reasonably high, but I can understand if someone's is not. Anyone who has lost interest should, on their next turn, hit the retire button and let us know they have done so. Then the rest of us can get on with it.

I'm going to agree with Thunderbrd that it (probably) wouldn't be significantly easier than any Barb city. The only difference is that it is there now, while Barb cities won't be appearing for a while yet. Either way, we'll deal with it.

Oh, and we did already start another multiplayer game. It has it's own problems. You may have noticed... ;)
 
The difference that it makes that the city is there currently is not much of one considering that the city is pretty much impenetrable to anything but a very committed effort to invade it with the tribal guardian being there. Won't be until around the same time as barb cities begin popping up that we'll have invasion skilled units enough to even worry about it anyhow and if anything, it'll be stronger, having been an actual game player, ai or human aside.
 
But the first person that meets that AI will get an unfair advantages by getting one extra city by conquering it. The AI is inferior, especially here when he have so much time to think about our turns. Can't someone take his place instead?

Not with the Tribal Guardian it isn't. That bad boy will make you pay dearly for taking a second city too soon, so I wouldn't be too worried about that.
 
Not with the Tribal Guardian it isn't. That bad boy will make you pay dearly for taking a second city too soon, so I wouldn't be too worried about that.

Anyway, it'll be pop 1 and therefore not takeable for some time.
 
Okay let the AI take over then. That is my vote
 
Turn done :woohoo:

T-Brd! Y'er Up!

JosEPh ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom