Matt's Mormon Thread

Homie said:
Hundegeschist, I am confused. From your account of the killings, this is how I read it: Some settlers from the east (maybe NY) came to Utah, there some Indians wanted to kill them, then the mormons stepped in and meddled between the parties, the parties accepted a truce. The settlers were to give up their guns and the indians were to not harm them. The settlers held up their end of the bargain and then the indians went and executed them now that they were defenseless. How could you possibly defend this? I can't think of anything more immoral and cowardly. No wonder the white man butchered the indians.
From what I understand, it's not the indians who executed the defensless settlers, but the Mormons
 
Are you lot the people that go door to door and try to convert people? If so you're bloody annyoing and turning more people off than "saving" their "souls"
 
silver 2039 said:
Are you lot the people that go door to door and try to convert people? If so you're bloody annyoing and turning more people off than "saving" their "souls"

considering Mormonism is the fasting growing chirstian faith, and the second fasting growing faith in the world, i'd say that's likely not true
 
shortguy said:
One of my high school friends was a Mormon; it's a very interesting belief system to be exposed to.

One question, though: Is it true that the church requests your financial statements to ensure that you're tithing appropriately?

not true. Tithing is up to the individual. No such statements are requried.
 
Stapel said:
Matt, what exactly is the purpose of the Mormon church in Zoetermeer (10 miles east of The Hague)?
There are dozens (hundreds?) of young Americans (all male?), wearing a suit (or rather a uniform) with their name tag on it, occasionaly wandering through town.

well, i dont think the church has any special purpose in Zoetermeer, (there's nothing we're doing there that we're not doing everywhere else)

those fellows with the white shirts and ties are your friendly neighborhood missioinaries. At some point, one might end up knocking on your door
 
Homie said:
Where are you going to be a Missionary? I went on a short Missionary trip to Fiji, which is where I met some mormons. Me and my team actually lived really close to a mormon temple, it looked pretty spectacular. Me and a buddy from the team went and played basketball on the hoop outside in their school courtyard, but they came and told us to leave :(. But it was their property so they had every right to do so.

i dont actually get to pick. Wherever they need me I guess.
 
I find these threads funny, but I'm going to throw my 2 cents of what I know.

Most of Mormon theology is, at least superficially, similar to Christian fundamentalist theology. Smith, after all, grew up in communities that had similar churches, so he would've been well exposed to the stuff. However, what's amusing is the nature of the way in which the religion was revealed.

Revealed religions include Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. They have a legendary origin in which the tenets of the religion are revealed from a divine source. In Islam, for example, it was when the Archangel Gabriel came to Mohammed. Mormonism is also a revealed religion. It is claimed that J. Smith received several documents, in the form of golden plates, from the angel Moroni, which were written in ancient Egyptien hieroglyphs. Smith also received two magical translation stones with which to decipher the text. This all occured about 1830 in upstate NY, in the town of Palmyra.

Although at the time, Egyptian hieroglyphs had been translated (thanks to the Rosetta stone) in Europe, news of this was slow to reach North America, especially into hick towns like Palmyra. So J. Smith thought he was coming up with something amazing, when in fact, Champollion had already figured out Egyptian writing in 1810. Supposedly, Smith had a (male) secretary that would take dictation while Smith would recite the revelations that were coming to him from the stones, as he'd "translate" the text. The secretary's wife wasn't buying the story of revelation through ancient Egyptian text, and destroyed her husband's dictations, saying "If he's so good at translating, let him do it again and see if he gets the same story." Let's just say that the second version wasn't the same. ;) (this is mostly hearsay anyway)

Part of the amusement of the Book of Mormon is that its language style is similar to the KJV of the Bible, even though English of that sort was 200 years out of date. You'd think that if you translated anything, even ancient Egyptian, properly, you'd translate it into the English of your own time.

The Golden Plates have not been publically seen for a long time. Apparently, the church elders that succeeded Smith stowed it away, for safe keeping, lest someone actually decipher it accurately. Be that as it may, some old photographs of some of the plates did make it out. When real Egyptologists attempted to decipher the text, they realized that it was actually excerpts from the Book of the Dead. The Book of the Dead is essentially a manual to the preserved mummy on how to make one's way to the afterlife. It describes what one should expect in the next life, including the judgement of Osiris by the weighing of the heart against a feather, to determine one's moral fortitude. You can guess that none of this is in the Book of Mormon.

I've already mentioned the references to alien visitation and Kolob.

Finally, there is the interesting matter of polygamy and racism. Polygamy was once doctrine of LDS, however, it no longer is. Only a few fringe groups still practice it, and they are not recognized as legit by the Church. The reason given is that it was a reinterpretation of doctrine, but the real reason is that the federal government refused to grant Utah admission into the Union as a state as long as polygamy was practiced. A similar situation occured with racism. Until about 1960, racism was written into doctrine as the "curse of Ham." After the civil rights act was passed in 1964, the church was investigated for racism, because it wanted to continue to be recognized as tax-exempt, as all other religions in the US. Once again, this doctrine was lifted. This is why nearly all Mormons you see proselytizing, while wearing those spiffy suits, mind you, are white.
 
To correct an earlier post, the doctrine of acheiving a god-like status after death does seem to show up in mormon literature, and is known as exaltation:
Book of Doctrines and Covenants said:
26 Verily, verily, I say unto you, if a man marry a wife according to my word, and they are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, according to mine appointment, and he or she shall commit any sin or transgression of the new and everlasting covenant whatever, and all manner of blasphemies, and if they commit no murder wherein they shed innocent blood, yet they shall come forth in the first resurrection, and enter into their exaltation; but they shall be destroyed in the flesh, and shall be delivered unto the buffetings of Satan unto the day of eredemption, saith the Lord God.

....

37 Abraham received concubines, and they bore him children; and it was accounted unto him for righteousness, because they were given unto him, and he abode in my law; as Isaac also and Jacob did none other things than that which they were commanded; and because they did none other things than that which they were commanded, they have entered into their exaltation, according to the promises, and sit upon thrones, and are not angels but are gods.

Matt: Have I interpreted that correctly? Is this belief widely held in the mormon community?
 
I posted this in the Scientology thread, but I suppose it should be posted here too: A webpage critical of Mormonism. I can certainly not vouch for the accuracy of all they say there, but they provide plenty of references, so checking up any claims you disbelieve should be doable.

I've only glanced at the page with evidence for the facticity of Book of Mormon history, but some of the stuff they have is decidedly unimpressive. Frex, they mention a copper-smelting site found in Guerrero in 2000 as corrobodating BoM claims of ancient metalworking in the Americas. Mighty fine, except that it's been known that the Mesoamericans knew gold, silver, and copper since the Spanish Conquest. The probablematic claim in the BoM is the pre-Columbian use of iron.
 
Che Guava said:
To correct an earlier post, the doctrine of acheiving a god-like status after death does seem to show up in mormon literature, and is known as exaltation:


Matt: Have I interpreted that correctly? Is this belief widely held in the mormon community?

in a very short answer, this is somewhat true. I admit, that i prob cant do it justice here. I might advice you look at the article regarding exaltatioin on the links in the OP, or ask the other Mormon. I suspect that since he recently got off his mission, he might be able to answer the question better than I.

if this is not the case, i'll hazard an explanation in a little while
 
MattBrown said:
haha, saw this one coming.
First, let it be known to the world that the Mormon church DOES NOT practice polygamy. I have a dad and a Mom. I only have one girlfriend. We havent been doing this for over 150 years.

im not sure exactly why the practice was re-instated for a time in the 1800's (i say reinstated because there are mentions of in it in the bible)....but the church was more than happy to comply when the US goverment told them to stop.

there is an essay on polygamy on one of the links...i think *here* http://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/FQ_Facet.shtml
so mormons dont practice polygamy:confused:
btw, one of my best friends is mormon
 
Something odd I found:

According to this this proclamation from 2000, the LDSs take the rather eccentric position that Jehova* in the old testament is to be identified with Jesus Christ, not with the Father. Yet, this page lists a variety of early Mormon texts that identify Jehova with the Father rather than the Son.

Just what is going on here?!


* Nitpick: That's not a correct vocalization of the Hebrew.
 
The Last Conformist said:
"Mainline" Mormons don't. There are some splinter groups that do (in violation of American law).

these splinter groups are not in any way affilated with the Latter Day Saint Mormon church based in Salt Lake. polygamy = execumincation
 
The Last Conformist said:
Something odd I found:

According to this this proclamation from 2000, the LDSs take the rather eccentric position that Jehova* in the old testament is to be identified with Jesus Christ, not with the Father. Yet, this page lists a variety of early Mormon texts that identify Jehova with the Father rather than the Son.

Just what is going on here?!


* Nitpick: That's not a correct vocalization of the Hebrew.

i suspect that use of the word Jehova, as used by very early Mormon leaders, may have been used in a context not speaking about the god of the old testement.

I am not totally sure, and i'll try to get back to you after asking some questions. I know that some of the quotes on that particular website, are, for lack of a better word, bullcrap....but not all of them. I suspect it has to do with context or quibbling over words. lemme check
 
Riesstiu IV said:
Are there any significant Mormon communities outside of the US?
Yes. Like I already said, I was in Fiji and there was a huge mormon tempel, even though almost all Fijians are methodist. In Kristiansand, Norway they have a tempel in the centre of the city - close to the old church, in Hawaii I saw a big tempel as well. I don't think they are the majority faith in any country, but they sure exist all over the globe.

Edit: Doh! Matt already answered this.
 
oddly enough, i think there is a Mormon majority in Tonga. I think thats the only country though
 
Back
Top Bottom