Zardnaar
Deity
Home fall in next few days or Assads forces make a stand?
It is in Belgium's interests that Syria gets controlled by jihadists?This is the new, multi-polar world order. Everyone regards any conflict only in their own interest, not unlike it was in the 19th century.
No, I think that the above is the definition of jingoism, since you literally don't care at all about Syrians, just care that "Russians are annoyed".Ofcourse,anything that annoys the Russian is gpod for the Belgian, we should oppose the imperialist bastards till the cows come home, don’t you think so ?
They self-identify as jihadists. Magically that is ok, depending on the enemy.
![]()
Rebels reach Syria's second city of Aleppo as deadly campaign continues
Syrian jihadists and their Turkish-backed allies reached the country's second city of Aleppo on Friday as they pushed ahead with their lightning advance. The rebels have seized more than 50 towns and…www.france24.com
I am sure the christian populations in Syria will be fine though. Likewise for the kurds.
I keep seeing different (unconfirmed?) reports lately that Assad has fled Syria.So, will Assad ask Putin for ammo, or will he ask for a ride?
Seems he's only going to be able to ask for the latter it seems :Looks like Homs is falling to the rebels as well, which is the last bastion left before Damascus.
So, will Assad ask Putin for ammo, or will he ask for a ride?
Do you have reading comprehension problem or are you just intent to project your own hypocrisy on others ? I specifically point that we can't know what will happen and it can be better or worse or the same, and then you try very hard to find a way to twist it into your own behaviour of "it's okay if it's the side I support who does it, it's bad when it's the other who does".So jihadists can't be worse than Assad? Is Assad satan or something?
So it's not relevant that jihadists are jihadists and formally ALLIED to Hamas and other jihadist factions?Do you have reading comprehension problem or are you just intent to project your own hypocrisy on others ? I specifically point that we can't know what will happen and it can be better or worse or the same, and then you try very hard to find a way to twist it into your own behaviour of "it's okay if it's the side I support who does it, it's bad when it's the other who does".
=>So it's not relevant that jihadists are jihadists and formally ALLIED to Hamas and other jihadist factions?
And after that you regard it as a good idea to say that I am finessing over things due to sympathies?![]()
Really can't add anything, it's all here. You manage to bend "can't say if the change will be good or bad" into some imaginary "yay Jihadists !", and it says a lot more about you than anyone else.Do you have reading comprehension problem or are you just intent to project your own hypocrisy on others ? I specifically point that we can't know what will happen and it can be better or worse or the same, and then you try very hard to find a way to twist it into your own behaviour of "it's okay if it's the side I support who does it, it's bad when it's the other who does".