- Joined
- Mar 17, 2007
- Messages
- 9,312
I'm curious which academic courses you've taken that have really stood out as not only well-taught, but also somewhat unusual in their approach.
I've taken plenty of well-taught and enjoyable courses, on topics as diverse as world history and computer architecture. But the most impressive one I've taken in its approach was a political thought course I took in high school. The basic format was that we'd study certain political movements in the U.S., with a focus on the more fringe ones, and then have a speaker come in from that movement to discuss it with the class (and sometimes, a speaker from an opposing movement as well). The impressive part was the diversity of speakers that were brought in, that it was always civil despite the very extreme viewpoints of some of the speakers, and that it was well-balanced so as not to endorse any of the viewpoints, nor indeed even revealing the teacher's own political position, but be purely educational and thought-provoking.
Examples of speakers represented included a leader of the local Green Party, a representative of the Nation of Islam, the leader of the National Socialist party in the state, and a representative of the Anti-Defamation League. It was striking to me how much more real the movements seemed when hearing an actual representative of them speak than reading about them in a textbook. Reading about what the Nazis believe in textbooks, it's easy to think, even if subconsciously, that no one really believes that when you're only used to the mainstream. Actually hearing someone expressing those views, you realize that some people really do believe in the fringe political movements.
The other impressive thing about the course was that it was possible at a public high school. I'd generally expect the U.S. to be too focused on political correctness to allow extremely non-mainstream speakers to talk to students.
I've taken plenty of well-taught and enjoyable courses, on topics as diverse as world history and computer architecture. But the most impressive one I've taken in its approach was a political thought course I took in high school. The basic format was that we'd study certain political movements in the U.S., with a focus on the more fringe ones, and then have a speaker come in from that movement to discuss it with the class (and sometimes, a speaker from an opposing movement as well). The impressive part was the diversity of speakers that were brought in, that it was always civil despite the very extreme viewpoints of some of the speakers, and that it was well-balanced so as not to endorse any of the viewpoints, nor indeed even revealing the teacher's own political position, but be purely educational and thought-provoking.
Examples of speakers represented included a leader of the local Green Party, a representative of the Nation of Islam, the leader of the National Socialist party in the state, and a representative of the Anti-Defamation League. It was striking to me how much more real the movements seemed when hearing an actual representative of them speak than reading about them in a textbook. Reading about what the Nazis believe in textbooks, it's easy to think, even if subconsciously, that no one really believes that when you're only used to the mainstream. Actually hearing someone expressing those views, you realize that some people really do believe in the fringe political movements.
The other impressive thing about the course was that it was possible at a public high school. I'd generally expect the U.S. to be too focused on political correctness to allow extremely non-mainstream speakers to talk to students.