That tends to happen when things are projected at the same scale in the same way.Wow, the borders reconcile very well between the maps.
I intend to produce an Earth GDK. Before that can happen, a few other things have to happen, like creating a unified draw-field for country gels, finishing the cities, settling on an optimal transparency ratio (the example is 50%), deciding on a single country gel style, deciding whether to do labeling, and whether or not to throw in military facilities (leaning toward no, though I do know how to do it at this point).It is indeed extraordinarily pretty. Any chance, though, that you could post the modern map in a format with layers, for ease of editing?
If you don't want to be called out on being Captain Obvious, you need to not say things Captain Obvious would say.Good grief, why do I even comment?![]()
Photoshop. If it was properly cut up, anything with layers could do it.What program do you use though to edit it?
If you don't want to be called out on being Captain Obvious, you need to not say things Captain Obvious would say.Go for Captain Morgan or somebody else instead.
That said, since people actually did find their way to this, are there any actual requests for what should be on a map?
... whut. Same borders.Its probably simple enough but can you transfer your borders to a white version of that map. Maybe do one of the cool black maps as well?
Isn't going to happen. It would be totally unreadable.I request a "budget version" of that map (<=500 KB for my and others' 31.2 Kbps connections).
flyingchicken said:I request a "budget version" of that map (<=500 KB for my and others' 31.2 Kbps connections).
Symphony D. said:Isn't going to happen. It would be totally unreadable.
The borders aren't the important part, city cores, which are one pixel, are. And that kind of compression can't display them clearly, and they need to be displayed clearly when viewing dense urban areas. So your standards, while maybe sufficient for you, are insufficient for the data being displayed on the map, and are thus insufficient period.For the plain terrain map, I tried re-saving it to a different file on my own PC, got it down to 489 kb with x15 compression. It looked OK to me, obviously distorted and kinda 'fuzzy', but the borders were still fully discernable. I guess it depends what your standards are, by my standards it can be done![]()
This is 40% opacity:I think it's a bit too opaque to see the physical features. Maybe if you cranked the transparency up five to ten percentage points, it'd be easier to tell.