NES2 VIb - Return of the Chaos.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I told you! It was conehead's idea! I didn't burn down any of your trade centers and etc. It was all his idea! Of course, I admit by now he has a habit of doing that.
 
No matter what France and Scandinavia focused on, your objective of weakening the Russian front isn't completed. If the Russians attack Krakow, then they'll most likely be slaughtered by massed weapons-fire. If they attack Finland, they're hankering for a Winter War. And thus, their only option is to remove the front of Persia, and Persia, not unlike Russia, has the convenient thing where it has so much space that it can afford to trade a lot for time. Plus, the aces which we have all over the place mean wherever they attack, they'll still be screwed anyway, unless they're damned near prophetic, in which case, they'll stretch their soldiers even more.

So consider your mission of causing the downfall of the world superpower null and void, because France has enough allies already on the front that it practically could sit back and cheerlead, and we'd still win.

Unless, of course, the next Russian project gives him 1,000,000,000,000 divisions without any support or training costs.

Lmao. Thats what you think I'm doing? I advise you to get some better spies ;]. Not like they'd know anything either, through.
 
Symphony D. said:
OOC: It's not my fault I'm always surrounded by either hostile or crumbling empires, or more often, both. The only nation which has ever bothered being truly trustworthy that was nearby was Kalinga, and I never took steps of any sort against it. All the others had it coming one way or the other. This is one of those instances. You can blame Alex for inspiring me to semi-paranoia.

Except for Xin Han China, which gave you a real opportunity to reverse what many have perceived as an aggressive stance. I tell you, in 100% honesty, that we were behind none of the plots you accuse us of.
 
North King said:
I'm supposed to believe that you're not going to attack Kalinga when we restart it? Don't count on it.
You can have your troops sit on your border watching mine and wasting their time all you want, it won't be my logistics money. :p I don't tend to attack unless there is sustainable gain ("you have something I want and can keep") or a clear and present danger is posed ("you are plotting against me"). Kalinga provided evidence of neither, so Khmeria helped it, and was helped. The HRE has done neither, so Japan helped it, and was helped. Spain, England, Portugal, all far away and weak. Take what they would lose anyway. China in IT I? Allying itself with somebody else unliked and setting itself up as a threat. Preemptive strike. China in IT II? Despite all of Cui's protestations (no offense) I'm more inclined to trust my intelligence service. Preemptive strike. Sheep doesn't, from what I've seen, do a whole lot of cloak and dagger resistance movements, and it's neither Stalin006, nor Grandmaster, and I somewhat doubt it's Tommy_Toon, though it could be, so that leaves just two possibilities. I countered both.

Unless you give me cause, I'm a nice guy. ;)
 
~Darkening~ said:
Lmao. Thats what you think I'm doing? I advise you to get some better spies ;]. Not like they'd know anything either, through.

Blah blah blah, I'm invincible. You're quite boring to discuss with; especially as the updates show that you really are an inflated bag of hot air. Good day. :p
 
Ken, i don't try to take meaningless rebels, i make rebels that i think have a chance of sucess and that i can build with. I could easily take the Jesuit right now but i don't have a plan for them

Always have a plan. And Symphony, this would make me 2/11, no 0/3 :lol: :lol:
 
huh?... did you not give me india panda :( cause that would be very very dishonest panda, and just cheap

@swiss ummm ok lol i don't understand but keep writting crazy stories lol
 
Ah, come on Ken, look at what happened to Swiss just last turn. Panda's not easy on the rebel movements. ;)
 
no but when i pmed him he said he would let me have freedom. If he does other wise, thats just stupid and unneccasry and very cheap.
 
Just for the sake of argument, why is it stupid to maintain direct control over an area if you have the ability to? Why is it unnecessary if it nets you EP/strategic location?

As for the last count, yes, it is cheap. But you can't say its unrealistic.

And I'm not saying I would have done the same thing... but then again I've yet to forge an empire like HRE. So maybe there's a lesson to be learned. *shrug*
 
Kentharu said:
no but when i pmed him he said he would let me have freedom. If he does other wise, thats just stupid and unneccasry and very cheap.
Ken, i had an ALLIANCE with the HRE and they annexed me and beheaded my rulers. I didn't protest because my people, they have no heads:p
 
no, he said he would pull out, thats what i mean. Him lying to me would be cheap, he is a huge empire, why would he have to lie to me?

w/e just drop it, before it turns spammy
 
He obviously lied to Swiss too. Why would he lie? To get you to do what he wanted while leaving you open to an attack you weren't expecting.

@ Swiss...

they annexed me and beheaded my rulers. I didn't protest because my people, they have no heads

hahahahaha, I'll have to sig that.

One could say we were pushing das' update to the next page, avoiding the spam label.
 
i have no territory, lying would be dumb and pointless. would you lie to a squirrel and tell him you weren't going to take his nuts? no, you would shoot the stupid thing and take the bloody nuts

no more about it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom