The new resource can be water (fresh water).
It's basic and "bleh" but it makes a little bit sense.
Except that it's tied to a specific civilization and I don't think anyone has had a historic monopoly on water
They said "natural resources" and just "resources", albeit the girl was probably talking about luxury resources.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=nCJQRL1AuMo#t=1084s
Is this the only reference to the resource tip? If so then I don't think we can deduce that the mystery resource has to be so unique that it would give away the civ. He says that he can't mention the new resource but he never says that mentioning it would give away the civ - just that he can't talk about things related to the new civ
"Nestlé CEO explains that water is a foodstuff that should be privatised, not a human right."
Reddit front page today![]()
Back on topic, regarding rice being a new unique resource...seriously? What about the civilizations already in the game (India, China, Korea, Japan, Siam) that eat rice too? I could just as easily say that if rice is the new resource then that means the Philippines (where I'm from) is in.This is absurd, and not just because we all know that the Philippines is never going to be in a Civ game.
![]()
Rice was the backbone for so many Asian nations so I'm surprised it's not in civ. It quite literally built great empires & nations. A lot of the times I wonder why things aren't in civ but this seems like such a fundamental thing that I really wonder why it's not in
"Nestlé CEO explains that water is a foodstuff that should be privatised, not a human right."
Reddit front page today![]()
Rice was the backbone for so many Asian nations so I'm surprised it's not in civ. It quite literally built great empires & nations. A lot of the times I wonder why things aren't in civ but this seems like such a fundamental thing that I really wonder why it's not in
A resource that indicates a civilization without doubt. This concerns me a little if it actually BELONGS to that Civ.
Why? Because, how many Civs can say such a resource would have been theirs if they were located elsewhere on the Earth? For example, if the Zulu or the English were actually in North America they would have made extensive use of Bison too. While the Sioux could have made fantastic glass if they were in the Venetian area.
If it is a worldwide resource, but one that is strongly associated with a Civ then I'm happy. So Bison, meaning the Sioux = great. But everyone can use the Bison. Let's be honest, if it's a representation of basically a big ass, wild cow then they are featured heavily in African areas too.
If you follow the path that one Civ get one resource, simply due to historically having it near them... then by that logic the American based nations shouldn't get to have Elephants spawn near them and so on. The whole point of Civ is a changing history game.
mhm i just hope they add things like coffee, sugar-cane and tobacco... those are some of the most important luxury resources of the modern world and they arent in
but we got truffels yay!![]()
I think Dates (Morocco),
Not to mention Corn and Potatoes - two extremely important crops for world history.