madviking
north american scum
Thicker brains or thicker heads? At times, I can't tell the difference.
No. They don't. The difference is, liberals are (currently) not willing to take action to alleviate whatever suffering they happen to be witnessing.So do liberals...?
How about when bold font fails? Will you put down the pom poms and actually pick up that gun? Otherwise, that short little cheerleadin' skirt might get you some unwanted attention.When the protest signs fail, are you willing to pick up a gun and fight for what you believe in? If not, you won't get it.
No. They don't. The difference is, liberals are (currently) not willing to take action to alleviate whatever suffering they happen to be witnessing. I'm willing to start wars in order to kill such people. Are you? Probably not. Waving protest signs usually fails to effect any real change. When the protest signs fail, are you willing to pick up a gun and fight for what you believe in? If not, you won't get it.
The amygdala is a part of the brain which is very old and very ancient and thought to be very primitive and to do with the detection of emotions. The right amygdala was larger in those people who described themselves as conservative.
Only 90 students? Seems like a pretty small sample to me.
No. They don't. The difference is, liberals are (currently) not willing to take action to alleviate whatever suffering they happen to be witnessing.
For example, people who execute women for adultery. I'm willing to start wars in order to kill such people. Are you? Probably not. Waving protest signs usually fails to effect any real change. When the protest signs fail, are you willing to pick up a gun and fight for what you believe in? If not, you won't get it.
there's no issue with sample size assuming they can state that its a random lot. You don't need a huge sample to have a sample size that gets your significance if its done right.
Which it isn't
And its not peer reviewed.
I have big doubts
For example: Liberals witness that people in the US are suffering because they don't have health insurance, so they take action and make laws so these people will get health insurance and good health care. They took action against the suffering they saw happening happening.
Oh wait....
Progressive and Conservative trains of thought existed in other societies well before the US was created.So how did our brains function before 1789?
No. They don't. The difference is, liberals are (currently) not willing to take action to alleviate whatever suffering they happen to be witnessing.
For example, people who execute women for adultery. I'm willing to start wars in order to kill such people. Are you? Probably not. Waving protest signs usually fails to effect any real change. When the protest signs fail, are you willing to pick up a gun and fight for what you believe in? If not, you won't get it.
the problem I see, as others have stated, is those who have changed their beliefs - I used to be a lot more conservative in my youth, and have been moving farther left ever since
We can't kill them all, the US isn't invincible...
That said, people who are willing to torture people and send them to concentration camps simply because they spoke a word against the government or follow a religion? That crosses the line, destroy their leaders.
"Progressive" and "Conservative" have very little to do with Left and Right.Progressive and Conservative trains of thought existed in other societies well before the US was created.
How would it explain people who were previously liberal and then changed their political leaning? Or vice versa?
So, what you're telling me is that my brain is swelling? How long do I have to live?