inthesomeday
Immortan
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 2,798
As long as the corporate and cultural influences that caused this are not held accountable it will happen again. And again and again and again.
Candace Owens on this terrorist attack:He also frequently cited Candace Owens, who praised Hitler recently and has said France needs to arm themselves against "Muslim invasion" and has been crowing about birthrates for years.
So you're holding him to the same standards you would hold a developmentally disabled black man. Less of a statement, in context.We're going to kill Dylan Roof.
Hold accountable cultural influences. We're going to kill Dylan Roof. Brevik is going to die in jail. I assume this can then be taken to mean our net needs wider and harsher? Or... ?
What a horrible tragedy and crime.
How long before we have someone blaming the left/liberals for mistreating right-wingers and creating the motivation for them to commit atrocities like this one?
You make the argument that we consider it somehow more acceptable because words, when we use words we already use for the worst sort of human possible, and we're going to kill him. Hey, I guess you're right. Words do matter, and actions matter more.
Though, if you actually go out and read the US news coverage and consider this important, as you seem to, you'll note that they're using the terms "terrorism" and "mosque shooting" which hearkens back and contextualizes our local, and longstanding usage, of "church shooting" or "synagogue burning" to describe domestic acts of terror. People know it's terrorism man. They're treating it like terrorism. So you have to decide exactly how big a issue you want to pick over your chosen words, and your chosen contextualizing, mattering. Consider farther: What does "church shooting" actually mean relative to the already used "terrorism" charge? Terrorism is usually lethal violence, but not always. Sometimes terrorism just destroys something in a scary way. Sometimes it's a disturbance. This is specified as a "shooting" or "mass shooting," which it is. Which is worse. Next, it's specifically a "mosque" shooting. So it's not a solider, or a cop, or a traveler, or a public street. It's understood as targeted at people during a period of vulnerability, of faith, of destroying intentionally a specific people in a moment of peace. It's worse. These are not new things for us, if it matters, we've described hate in these terms for a long time, unfortunately. Be they bombings or burnings or hangings or stabbings or shootings. It would be much better if we did not have an event to so describe right now, but there are no punches being pulled in the description. About the only traction I'm coming up with on the difference between "terrorism" and "church/mosque/school shooting/burning/attack" is that "terrorism" often carries an undertone of "other" or "exotic" of "foreign" that the other, more localized shame/horror language, does not. Which, I thought was some of the point in the first place. Isn't it? Somewhat interesting in the light of it being a international news story, considering. Interesting in the "interesting times" way of being interesting.
Forty-nine people have been killed and 48 wounded in shootings at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, in the nation's deadliest attack.
The gunman live-streaming the attack from a head-mounted camera said he was a 28-year-old Australian called Brenton Tarrant.
Authorities advised all mosques in the city to shut down until further notice.
According to the latest census figures, Muslims make up about 1.1% of New Zealand's population of 4.25 million.
No, I don't remember. I've silenced Tucker Carlson. Nobody in my media bubble in my physical life listens to Tucker Carlson. We call a variety of things terrorism. Domestic and otherwise. Church/synagogue/mosque shootings are worse.
Neither in mine but he is the number one rated news pundit in the country and he touts white nationalism in code all year long. The fact that it’s inspiring terrorist attacks needs to be acknowledged.
Ben Shapiro has now been cited in two fascist terrorist attacks and pewdiepie in this, and the fact that super famous people can run around saying "Muslims destroy" and live in dirt and are inherently bad, and throw up Nazi imagery and denigrate Jewish people routinely, and we spend time debating if it's satire or stupid edginess or a valuable inclusion in the marketplace of ideas is a goddamn joke.
He also frequently cited Candace Owens, who praised Hitler recently and has said France needs to arm themselves against "Muslim invasion" and has been crowing about birthrates for years.
Neither in mine but he is the number one rated news pundit in the country and he touts white nationalism in code all year long. The fact that it’s inspiring terrorist attacks needs to be acknowledged.