I'm going to guess Barbarossa will have a city-state flavor from dealing with the German principalities and fighting Italian city-states. And his agenda will probably make him mad when you replace him as ally of a city-state.
As a German I think Barbarossa and the "Heiliges Römisches Reich Deutscher Nation" was one of the biggest chapter of german history. But since World War II we've lost our patriotism and so it doesn't matter which german leader would be in the game. For me it makes no difference, if it was Barbarossa or Bismarck again. What Barbarossa failed led Bismarck to an end - to unify the german countries. The idea to use him as a leader for Germany ist good, but not important.
As a German you learn more about the benefit from great personalities like Luther, Goethe or Schiller and less good about leadership.
In hundred of years I would prefer Angela Merkel as a leader for Germany, because she stands for all that Germany has changed over the last 25 years.
Conclusion: Barbarossa is a good choice, but the bonuses are also militarily. Pity!
Don't all districts get like a +.5 yield for adjacent districts? So is that just the typical adjacency bonus? Also, do we know yet if the Hanse still gets the Mine/Quarry bonuses Industrial districts usually get?
and showing the same video again and again...
Looking forward to the new footage on Friday/Saturday/Sunday.
Especially Writing Bull's new footage who played the older build already. He might be more interested in faster play this time and looking for new stuff.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.