Massive Attack
Warlord
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2007
- Messages
- 162
Symphony D said:And exactly what international law is the CFS citing? The only authority currently in existence on international space law is the UPNCS, being the only direct, legitimate continuation of an organization which predates the Scourge and issued rulings on such matters. Or, is the CFS presuming that the UPNCS is violating its own precepts? And then, for what purpose does it allege it is doing so? The USC has reviewed the statues on such matters and its legal experets have seen no reason for their dismissal. We are more than willing to allow full transparency of our findings to whatever faction might be interested in seeing the relevent materials.
It appears that the UCS/UPNCS is under a severe misunderstanding of what international law is, how it is created, and who it applies to.
The UPNCS is NOT international law. Assuming, arguendo, that the UPNCS is the legitimate continuation of a certain organziation, the precepts of the UPNCS ONLY applies to the jurisdiction and members of the UPNCS. Hench, the UPNCS, acting as a single state, passes domestic law, not international law. International law is the law between states and not the dictates of one state's internal law applied to other states.
The CFS, Emergents, Nekomi, etc, are not members to the UPNCS organization, and therefore are not bound by its precepts. Thus, there relations with the UPNCS are governed by international law, not the law of the UPNCS. This is a distinction that the UPNCS/USC seems to not understand; it is quite clear that UPNCS is conflating its internal law with international law, an illusion of grandeur if any. We strongly suggest they rectify this mistake, lest we be forced to dispel those illusions for them.
Furthermore, if the UPNCS claims are to be believed, then it would appear that the UPNCS/USC must denies]/i] the sovereignty and independance of the CFS, Emergents, Nekomi, etc. This, we think, is not a position we, nor our allies, nor any other stellar nation, would approve.
The USC has already noted its decision to adhere to all UPNCS declared laws, referendums, and international decisions, with the election to restrain the execution of these decisions by its own means*. Perhaps the CFS government has not been doing its data-mining thoroughly enough.
So then who is the overarching, federal government of your nation? The UPNCS or the USC? We will only deal with that government who has legitimacy on the international level. If the USC is subrogating its foreign policy to the UPNCS then that is violating its own agreement with the UPNCS. We have no problem if you two have decided that the USC will be subsumed into the UPNCS, we simply demand that, on the international level, you represent yourself honestly and truthfully as you exist.
That is both hypocritical in light of former diplomatic precedent by all core nations and furthermore not an option unless you wish to ignore USC policy as well, which would not be wise.
We wish to make this absolutely clear: we are not obligated to the UPNCS. We are not members of that organization, and therefore its internal mandates have no effect on us.
P.S. Ya'll fail. Did I post those demands? No. Did I demand the blockade on the Nekomi? No. So don't call them USC demands, because if you'll notice, the USC isn't issuing them, just executing them. It's hard to negotiate with people who can't even get their facts right.
You seem to miss the point. It doesn't matter that you didn't technically make those demands. We're not going to let you get away with such two-faced talking--we're going to attribute it to you.