Yet again Earthling lies like crazy and I tell the truth, yet he says (and apparently believes) the complete opposite.
Zack everything I said about what happened between the two of us was the truth, and you were specifically lying.
Now the game is over, I'll post the private message (that Zack lied about). As I said on our QT, I don't know how you think lying about private messages is a good strategy - the only thing it has going is that people aren't allowed to post the private messages during the game so other than the person you're lying to, it maybe can't be proven. But that person will always know you're a scum. It would be better if you just didn't answer rather than lie about things someone said publicly, or a private message that's been sent.
Just like what happened in previous games, where another player KNOWS you are lying, I could sit there and read the private message that you were obviously lying about.
So here's what we had:
Earthling: ASKS Zack if being a roleblocker is his ability and what he's been doing.
Zack (word for word, the exact PM he sent)
Zack said:
I've only roleblocked Beefy, and it was the night he was killed. That's it.
Why'd you make my ability public?
Anyways, I think that I should roleblock either Frozen In Ice or landlubber - whoever doesn't get lynched.
So Zack lied about the following:
-Obviously lied about his actual abilities. Course you don't expect him to answer "I really had the ability to work on the ritual of Death" but it was clearly a lie. In the gamethread, Zack said roughly that he "kept forgetting and didn't have time to send in orders" which was pretty clearly a lie as well - he'd been online CFC plenty and participating in other games.
-Lied about what I actually did, as I did NOT "reveal Zack's ability" in public. When I posted in public, I did ASK if anyone had more knowledge and I even asked for speculation on if a Shade could roleblock, but I did NOT say "Zack did this"
-In the thread, he lied about wanting to go after Frozen in Ice or landlubber - I specifically pointed this out in the thread, and Zack denied it.
In the game thread afterwards, Zack denied some of these things and changed his mind, and also refused to explain other things - he just never answered on any questions about, say, his item.
Now, I certainly had extra knowledge about other players - compared to the average Innocent I knew who my allies were and knew we were looking for the Ritual of Death. But Zack was still quite clearly lying and I think other players really should have been able to figure out he was lying about his abilities - he wasn't just a "lurker who 'forgot' to use his abilities"