Obama less popular than G.W. Bush in Mideast

amadeus

Bishop of Bio-Dome
Joined
Aug 30, 2001
Messages
40,122
Location
Weasel City
Obama, US viewed less favorably in Arab world, poll shows

The United States is viewed less favorably in much of the Arab world today than it was during the final year of the Bush administration, and President Obama is less popular in the region that Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, according to a poll released today (WED) by the Arab American Institute, a nonpartisan research and advocacy group.

Attitudes towards the US president and the United States as a whole have been growing increasingly negative over the past ten years due to the invasion of Iraq, outrage over Guantanamo Bay, and continued frustration over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, said James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute, which has been tracking attitudes for a decade.

But the current poll is striking in that is illustrates how far Obama’s favorability has fallen in the region, after an initial optimistic spike when he took office.

“It’s because expectations were created that were not met,” Zogby said.

In 2008, the final year of the Bush administration, only nine percent of Egyptians had a favorable attitude towards the United States. A year later, after Obama took office, that number jumped to 30 percent. But now it has plummeted to just five percent of Egyptians who view the United States favorably.

Similar figures in Morocco, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates show that the United States is viewed less favorably now than the final year of the Bush administration.

In a worrisome sign for US policymakers who would like to enlist the region’s support in isolating the Iranian regime, the poll shows that the policies of Iran are viewed more favorably than the policies of the United States.

In Egypt and Jordan, only three percent of people polled said they agreed with Obama’s policies in the region, compared to 31 percent and 20 percent who said they agreed with the Iranian president’s. In Saudi Arabia, only ten percent agreed with Obama’s policies, compared to four percent who said they agreed with the Iranian president.

Zogby said Obama’s appointment of a special ambassador to work on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - by far the most important issue to people in the region, according to the poll - raised initial expectations. But then the US failure to make progress on the issue created widespread disillusionment.

Zogby said he spoke briefly with Obama a month ago about the poll and that the president said he expected the numbers to be low, given the impasse on the Israeli-Palestinian problem.

Other findings from the poll: Large numbers of Arabs say the no-fly zone over Libya either has no impact on or will worsen US-Arab relations.

Also, only 39 percent of Egyptians say the Arab world is better off since the uprisings spread across the region this spring, with 45 percent saying it is “too early to tell.”
From the Boston Globe

I find it interesting that a virulently pro-Israel George Bush is favored more in the Mideast than the wavering, ultimately (to the Arabs) disappointing Obama. Can further meddling in the region (i.e., anything to do with the "peace process") ever help improve U.S. image in the Mideast?

padkm.png
This is a pan-Arab diamond thread.
padkm.png
 
Did they explain why? Bush is a more likely personality wise - That's about the only thing I can come up with to explain it.
 
This is more likely recency bias than anything else. In hypothetical terms, if Bush had been elected for a third term, he'd likely be in the same position regarding the middle East. As it is, Bush hasn't been calling the shots outside of Crawford, Texas (or Preston Hollow) for two and a half years.
 
Did they explain why? Bush is a more likely personality wise - That's about the only thing I can come up with to explain it.
According to the article, disappointment in a lack of change of U.S. policy toward Israel. Personally, I think it's absurd. Take Cuba in the Western hemisphere as an example, a thorn in the side of the U.S. Yet Americans do not hold Canada or France in contempt for continuing trade with them and Americans have a lot more room to be worried about such largely superficial issues. Many Arabs live in poverty but still focus a disproportionate amount of energy on animosity towards the U.S. for policies that don't really matter to them materially.
 
Who cares, Obama is far more awesome than his nay sayers in the Middle East. :smug:
 
It's funny how so many Arabs will go on about how they support the Palestinians, but when it gets right down to it, a lot of Arabs I've spoken to don't really like Palestinians that much. And they aren't willing to do anything to help them. For some reason a lot of Arabs I've met can't stand Egyptians either. Turkey has gone very pro-Palestine most recently but most Turks don't like Arabs at all. People in the Middle East really just don't like each other.

An Egyptian friend of mine who currently lives there said he's against the uprising because it just created a lot of chaos. He did say the corruption in Egypt was really terrible so there was plenty of reason for an uprising but maybe it won't change things for the better.
 
Misleading heading is misleading:

Attitudes towards the US president and the United States as a whole have been growing increasingly negative over the past ten years due to the invasion of Iraq, outrage over Guantanamo Bay, and continued frustration over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, said James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute, which has been tracking attitudes for a decade.
It really has nothing to do with Obama's popularity versus GWB, especially given that the latter is primarily resposible for the events which continue to upset them so much. I dare say they would be even more upset if GWB, or someone who shared his views, was the current president.
 
I think it just means that they have essentially given up that the US will ever do anything to reign in Israel. Apparently, many actually believed that Obama would do so given the huge spike when he was elected.
 
Misleading heading is misleading:

It really has nothing to do with Obama's popularity versus GWB, especially given that the latter is primarily resposible for the events which continue to upset them so much. I dare say they would be even more upset if GWB, or someone who shared his views, was the current president.

I would not be so sure. Someone who either is not honest about his views, or is unable to uphold them effectively (Obama) is not much better than someone who directly presents them. In either case, the course has not been averted, and instead Obama is finding new ways to entangle the US within that region.
 
Yep. I think it just means that they have essentially given up that the US will ever do anything to reign in Israel. Apparently, many actually believed that Obama would do so given the huge spike when he was elected.

In a worrisome sign for US policymakers who would like to enlist the region’s support in isolating the Iranian regime, the poll shows that the policies of Iran are viewed more favorably than the policies of the United States.
Now that is revealing.
 
I think it just means that they have essentially given up that the US will ever do anything to reign in Israel. Apparently, many actually believed that Obama would do so given the huge spike when he was elected.

Many thought the Titanic would not sink.....
 
Yeah I'd be pretty pissed off too if I was still dealing with the US's BS on a daily basis, and the guy that promised to change everything turned out to be a dirty liar.
 
Obama certainly never promised to get real about Israel and the incessant problems it causes in the region - just the opposite. He made it quite clear that it would be business as usual.
 
According to the article, disappointment in a lack of change of U.S. policy toward Israel. Personally, I think it's absurd. Take Cuba in the Western hemisphere as an example, a thorn in the side of the U.S.
What..? You've got that completely backwards. Cuba couldn't hurt Americans if it wanted to.

Many Arabs live in poverty but still focus a disproportionate amount of energy on animosity towards the U.S. for policies that don't really matter to them materially.
Probably because the policies are atrocious at the core. You aren't going to get around that.
 
First sentence of article:
The United States is viewed less favorably in much of the Arab world today than it was during the final year of the Bush administration, and President Obama is less popular in the region that Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, according to a poll released today (WED) by the Arab American Institute, a nonpartisan research and advocacy group.
I hope the bolded bits will help to improve the OP and thread title by removing all the errors in it.

You're welcome :)
 
Is there any real reason to think the US will ever be popular long-term in the mideast? The US and Iraq or Saudi Arabia are extremely different places, cultures, values etc. As handy as it would be to be beloved everywhere it's not going to happen. It's worse than it could be, but it probably won't be above 50% for a long, long time, if ever.
 
Back
Top Bottom