Obama to call for repeal of DADT in State of the Union

[holy king]

in what world is talking about sex "impolite"?

 

[Lone Wolf]

in what world is talking about sex "impolite"?

See my Marple quotation a few posts above.

 

[useless]

It is now.

It's impolite to discuss sex in any public venue. I figured that was obvious. Obviously I was wrong. Next time I'll make an extra effort to explain the obvious.

Well then, i hope you mention nothing about loving your girlfriend/wife/significant other in public. I also hope you don't make it obvious or clear you have any of those, as that would be wrong and impolite. I also hope you don't kiss her, as that could offend some really conservative people.

 

[JollyRoger]

So are <removed> allowed to fraternize in the military now?

Or will they be disciplined in the same manner their heterosexual counterparts are?

At what point do homosexual rights conflict with heterosexual rights? At what point are heterosexuals allowed to say they've been inundated with enough pro-gay garbage that now they are the victim?

Because that's what's coming. More<removed> lawsuits, this time from straights who've been bashed by gays.

Ending DADT would just bring gays up to the current rights enjoyed by straights. You seem to be jumping the gun a bit to wallow around in victimhood, but perhaps that is an unintended tell on a possible masochistic orientation.

 

[warpus]

@ Nares

Seriously?

What about any of this makes you think that fraternization would be allowed or that homosexuals are going to get rights that aren't afforded to their heterosexual counterparts?