Bronx Warlord
Squad Leader
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2004
- Messages
- 2,449
thought WMD´s were like nukes... mustard gas doesnt seem very "mass destruction" to me
Ever seen what it does to humans? there was a reason it was not used in world war two.
thought WMD´s were like nukes... mustard gas doesnt seem very "mass destruction" to me
Abaddon said:I thought WMD´s were like nukes... mustard gas doesnt seem very "mass destruction" to me...
Mustard gas is a strong vesicant (a compound that causes blisters). Those exposed usually suffer no immediate symptoms. The exposure develops (in 4 to 24 hours) into deep, itching or burning blisters wherever the mustard contacted the skin; the eyes (if exposed) become sore and the eyelids swollen, possibly leading to conjunctivitis and blindness. At very high concentrations, if inhaled, it causes bleeding and blistering within the respiratory system, damaging the mucous membrane and leading to pulmonary edema. Blister agent exposure over more than 50% body surface area is usually fatal.
Skin damage can be reduced if povidone iodine in a base of glycofurol is rapidly applied, but since mustard initially has no symptoms, the exposure is usually not identified until the blisters rise. The vesicant property can be neutralised by oxidation or chlorination, common bleach (NaOCl-) can be used or decontamination solution "DS2" (2% NaOH, 70% diethylenetriamine, 28% ethylene glycol monomethyl ether). Mustard gas is also carcinogenic (cancer causing) and mutagenic (causing damage to DNA of exposed cells).
Alright I agree. Bush has never talked about WMD programs, he was assuming that Saddam had kept few gas shells from the Iran-Iraq war, and that Saddam had let those weapons getting deteriorated on purpose... to hide them better. I agree that all this seems very well-planned.usarmy18 said:Mustard gas is pretty "mass destructive".
Marla_Singer said:Alright I agree. Bush has never talked about WMD programs, he was assuming that Saddam had kept few gas shells from the Iran-Iraq war, and that Saddam had let those weapons getting deteriorated on purpose... to hide them better. I agree that all this seems very well-planned.
Now I just have a question, how those 20 year-old deteriorated mustard gas shells were posing a threat to the United States requiring the US to invade first ? What was Saddam secret's strategy to drop those 500 rusty shells on the US soil ?
Maybe he was thinking about giving them to his great friends of Al-Qaeda ? After all, there were some Kurdish independentists who were supporting Al-Qaeda ! But wait, how those Kurdish independentists could trust Saddam and how was it in their interests to transit those shells to the US ? And how to transit them ?
There is certainly a key to this... but there's no doubt Saddam wanted to send his old deterioriated rusty shells to devastate New York City. There was clearly no other move to avoid that secret attack than in invading.
And despite the declaration of the US government itself, who did say that those weapons weren't what they were looking for, it's obvious that the "anti-war crowd" has been FINALLY proven to be wrong.
Haha ! Mobboss we've won ! We're the best ! The other side is made of losers hahaha !
Now I just have a question, how those 20 year-old deteriorated mustard gas shells were posing a threat to the United States requiring the US to invade first ? What was Saddam secret's strategy to drop those 500 rusty shells on the US soil ?
Haha ! Mobboss we've won ! We're the best ! The other side is made of losers hahaha !
Alright... so now there were connections between the Iraqi and the Taliban goverments... Wait, the same Taliban government who didn't exist anymore after November 2001 ?usarmy18 said:The Iraqi and Taliban governments were meeting with each other. That's all the reason I need to play connect the dots and see that chemical weapons might have exchanged hands to the Taliban in the near future and then on to Al-Qaeda. Whether or not this would've happened is irrelavant to me. Saddam needed to go.
BasketCase said:Saddam set a precedent over his first twenty years in office: he launched unprovoked wars against two of his neighbors. For all of recorded history, that has constituted sufficient grounds for non-involved nations (i.e. nations that were never attacked by the invader) to strike back at the invader with devastating force.
Yet, when it happens in 2003, most of the world's leaders and two-thirds of CFC members flip a 180 and say it's not okay to shoot at somebody unless they invade YOU specifically.
BasketCase said:The claim by the anti-war camp was that there were NO WMD's IN IRAQ AT ALL. The fact that we found some of any kind, dilapidated or not, usable or not, throws that claim into doubt.
Marla_Singer said:Alright... so now there were connections between the Iraqi and the Taliban goverments... Wait, the same Taliban government who didn't exist anymore after November 2001 ?
Those evil secular fundamentalist terrorists are really tricky ! But I know that if we annihilate Mecca half of the problem would be solved, right Mobboss ?
Sidhe said:So now unusable chemicle weapons constitute weapons of mass destruction, oh straw man how we grasp at thee, I didn't realise people were offering this as an argument, I kind of assumed it was a joke?![]()
Marla_Singer said:Alright I agree. Bush has never talked about WMD programs, he was assuming that Saddam had kept few gas shells from the Iran-Iraq war, and that Saddam had let those weapons getting deteriorated on purpose... to hide them better. I agree that all this seems very well-planned.
Now I just have a question, how those 20 year-old deteriorated mustard gas shells were posing a threat to the United States requiring the US to invade first ? What was Saddam secret's strategy to drop those 500 rusty shells on the US soil ?
Maybe he was thinking about giving them to his great friends of Al-Qaeda ?
Haha ! Mobboss we've won ! We're the best ! The other side is made of losers hahaha !
IglooDude said:12 dead, 54 injured. I'm absolutely not making light of 12 people dying, but that hardly qualifies as "mass destruction" in my book.
Perhaps there's a terminology problem here. WMDs =/= NBC weapons. All WMDs are apparently NBC weapons, but not all NBC weapons are WMDs.
MobBoss said:Well, he did give his friends the Iranians his fighter jets during the first Gulf War didnt he? WHY YES HE DID.
usarmy18 said:Where do you get that they are unusable?
usarmy18 said:Sarin is classified as a Weapon of Mass Destruction by the UN.