Please create new sub-forum, pleeaassseee...

[Hadrean]

Indeed. CFC Prides itself on it's uniqueness. How can we be unique if everyone else is doing the same thing?

We can be unique but not unorganized.

 

[gmaharriet]

Here I did this.

Simple yet efficient.

Very nice! I like it.

 

[strategyonly]

I believe the Moderators should post a thread asking for a PRO's and CON's lists from the forum members about Warlords vs CIV 4 , forum vs sub-forum etc.

Then if the Pros are more, then poof Warlords section, if CONs then poof, NO.

 

[ggganz]

Indeed. CFC Prides itself on it's uniqueness. How can we be unique if everyone else is doing the same thing?

We can't, but confusing people doesn't mean unique, or good in any way for that matter.

 

[Turner]

I believe the Moderators should post a thread asking for a PRO's and CON's lists from the forum members about Warlords vs CIV 4 , forum vs sub-forum etc.

Then if the Pros are more, then poof Warlords section, if CONs then poof, NO.

Or we can just ask Thunderfall. If he says 'Yes', then we get the subforum. If he says 'No', then we don't.

Much simpler.

 

[strategyonly]

Or we can just ask Thunderfall. If he says 'Yes', then we get the subforum. If he says 'No', then we don't.

Much simpler.

ok then the result is?

 

[Red Door]

Well, if it was "yes," we'd see a forum.

 

[Truronian]

Or we can just ask Thunderfall. If he says 'Yes', then we get the subforum. If he says 'No', then we don't.

Much simpler.

Thats what I like about dictatorships, none of this time consuming voting.

 

[ggganz]

Or we can just ask Thunderfall. If he says 'Yes', then we get the subforum. If he says 'No', then we don't.

Much simpler.

I asked him. We'll see what he thinks about it.

 

[Thunderfall]

Ok, I will create it. In 6 months or so we will merge it back to the main forum.

 

[strategyonly]

Now that is very reasonable, thx.

 

[Red Door]

I see it, even though it was plenty reasonable before.

 

[ggganz]

In 6 months or so we will merge it back to the main forum.

What do you mean? You will delete the forum after six months and put all the threads into the general discussions page?

 

[Red Door]

What do you mean? You will delete the forum after six months and put all the threads into the general discussions page?

Yep.

 

[ggganz]

Then what's the point of having it in the first place?

 

[Kan' Sharuminar]

Then what's the point of having it in the first place?

Presumably to cope with the large amount of people who register as a result of the Warlords release. After a while things will die down and the one forum is enough.

Is this what happened with the Civ3 expansions?

 

[Red Door]

Only for Conquests.

BTW, I hate the new forum, I'm so used to clicking the third forum for Creation and Customization, and now, I click the 3rd link by instinct, I'm in Strategy and Tips. AUGH!!!

 

[Padma]

We never had a PTW forum. And we had a Conquests forum largely because the publisher asked for it.

And yes, the Conquests forum was merged back into the CIv3 forums.

 

[ggganz]

Oh, and I now see that it means the Warlords thing will become a link under General discussions, I think.

 

[Padma]

Eventually it will *become* part of Civ4-GD.

The "Warlords" forum will disappear, and the threads will be found in the regular Civ4 forum.