warpus
Sommerswerd asked me to change this
While i like sugar (and chocolate), the only obviously addictive product with either would be coke and similar soda drinks.
Maybe obviously, but I think you need to take a look at this book.
While i like sugar (and chocolate), the only obviously addictive product with either would be coke and similar soda drinks.
Have to go with lifestyle.
I've been thinking of this, and when I was a kid, most kids were thin, and not fat. Same with adults. Something happened in the last 30 years. And it isn't food, we had the same unhealthy foods in the 80's. Soda was just as abundant in the 80's. So I can't blame it all on the foods. The problem is with us.
I disagree. We had McDonald's and soda back in the 70's and 80's, and people weren't fat back then. Our culture has changed (and why I voted lifestyle).
When I order a small pop at a movie theater and get a small pool that could easily hold a toddler, we have an issue.
I would say that you have an issue, not them. Fortunately, the issue is easily solved.
- don't order it
- dump half of it out as soon as you get it
- tell them to fill it up halfway
- don't order it
See? There's lots of ways to solve this issue. Now, if the movie theater forcibly feeds that drink to you, then they have an issue. Otherwise ... sorry, it's on you.
Sorry, but I put all the responsibility on the person who actually orders and consumes it. If I eat too much, it's my fault, not Claim Jumper's.
Then you are ignoring a lot of factors that impact obesity to an extent that I can't take your post really seriously.
My vote is for consuming more calories than you burn.
I wonder. If I order a meal in a restaurant I do tend to, in fact almost invariably, eat everything on the plate: that's what I've paid for.
If I order a meal in a restaurant I do tend to, in fact almost invariably, eat everything on the plate: that's what I've paid for.
Not in Canada as far as I know. School has veered way off from life skills and right into standardized memorization-based knowledge territory. I took a cooking class in high school that was attached to a 'family studies' course which was female-centric (woo, sexism!) and it did not teach me the foundations of cooking or any basic meals. It did, however, teach me how to make shaped pancakes and a complicated spicy quinoa casserole that took five hours to make. Yay, cooking!
No argument here. My point it's not because of availability (although I'll admit many companies are sneaking sugar into products it doesn't belong like bread). All this sugar was available to us in the 70's and the 80's. Our lifestyle is why we didn't eat too much of it. It wasn't culturally acceptable to be fat.
Then you are ignoring a lot of factors that impact obesity to an extent that I can't take your post really seriously. It's more a "pie in the sky" type of thought more than anything else. Sure, in a universe where basic psychology works much differently than in our universe, what you say might be considered as a good point, I concede that.
I do agree that personal responsibility is the core of the problem, but I'd still not ignore completely the environment, nor completely absolve the food industry for its own part of responsibility.Personal. Responsibility.
Seriously.
Sure there are a lot of factors, but it all boils down to the math.
It's funny to see people screaming "just use your brain!" when the food industry's advertisers and products are specifically designed to short circuit your brain and otherwise exploit it.
I disagree. Advertising almost never works on me. I have yet to buy a product seen in the superbowl commercials.