plarq
Crazy forever
It's parental obligation to provide porn for their kids.
It's demeaning to men and women.
In order for something to be demeaning, value judgement is necessary on the part of the actor. And all value judgements being subjective, the term demeaning doesnt hold any interpersonal objective truth value
Implying that pornography is inherently demeaning to women is just dumb in my opinion. And that thing about body ideals, I find meaningless. Judging by the front covers, teen magazines are far worse than anything when it comes to these things.
Agreed.
And I'd add that it's demeaning to men as well. I'm usually expected to put out sexually since I'm a male, therefore I must be permanently horny from society's PoV.
EDIT; and I'd like to add that I'd adore more natural pornography as the current sort just doesn't do it at all for me... It's too idiotic.
It's demeaning to men and women. The fact that this question is even being asked just demonstrates how warped our culture is. Imbeciles who think the pornography question is just a matter of "brainwashed fundamentalists ashamed of the human body that are impeding social progress" can shove it.
And I think anything you're against is worth a look just on principle, because you're not only completely biased, you're also barely articulate. You should put up a statement when you start a new thread saying something along the lines of "otagan thread therefore partisan invective". Or just refrain from starting new threads.Should you not put a statement up along the lines of xtian therefore completely biased in my views ?
You do not get it do you, anything fundies are against some of us would believe is worth having a look at just on principle.
And I think anything you're against is worth a look just on principle, because you're not only completely biased, you're also barely articulate. You should put up a statement when you start a new thread saying something along the lines of "otagan thread therefore partisan invective". Or just refrain from starting new threads.
I find it rather sad that you seem to believe sexuality to be something inherently bad, compareable to something like mass murder....or maybe you were just setting up a strawmanYes, let's teach pornography to give a natural and realistic view of sex. While we're at it, let's show Texas Chainsaw frickin' Massacre to give an accurate portrayal of the mentally ******ed.
I think the problem is that the concept of sexuality, sexual knowledge, and sexual images being is some way harmful to adolescents is just foolish as hell on the face of it. But from the ridiculous premise of sexuality being in some way harmful, all else ridiculous follows. In the US at 14 many kids have had sex, and many more have seen porn. And they go on to have normal lives. Where they get screwed up is the sexual repression of society that attempt so prevent them from having healthy attitudes and practical knowledge of sex. If teens don't have knowledge of sex, they're going to go looking for it. And trial and error method of finding it causes vastly more harm to vastly more people than having the broadcast tv after school special being porn every day could possibly do.
Are you attempting to patronize me?Sorry dear boy, but are you attempting to state that if I put a thread up you have a Pavlovian response in being forced to click on it ?
Now that is a sad state of affair for you to be in, help is available.
It's called Playboy.Pornography for 14 year olds
It's called Playboy.
I find it rather sad that you seem to believe sexuality to be something inherently bad, compareable to something like mass murder....or maybe you were just setting up a strawman
First person shooters like Call of Duty are demeaning to soldiers. I demand them banned forthwith.