Didn't Babylon come after Assyria? And if we're adding Assyria, we need Media too.
Linkman, I was looking at python and the map and I think i might be able to do resources for you (placement, spread, spawn, etc); that is if you want me to?
BTW. Any update on the next svn release? (not to put any pressure on you or anything)
I will have it done by the end of next week (most likely before that but it depends).1) That'd be very nice. Thanks.
No need to apologize. Take you time and school (and life) comes first.2) No clue, honestly. Sorry
What do you guys think of a Sumer-->Babylonia-->Assyria system?
No, the Medes didn't conquer Mesopotamia ever. The problem with a Babylonia/Assyria rename is that they were both polities that exist parallel to each other and were major rivals.
I could see Assyria as a name for Babylonia with Niniveh as capital, though.
I think Sumeria and Babylonia can be two separate civs, but it would need much better implementation than in Civs in Abundance.
IMO Sumeria Akkadia Babylonia Assyria etc are the same civilization same cultures same peoples with different kingdom and time period?
I think it's alright since our game name is Civilization 4, not Kingdom 4...
That's one of the logical reason about Arab too.. and Chinese too..
Btw,
I'd like to suggest, if there's unlimited times a minor can be respawned,
to make the Ancient Near East more interesting,
Spawn the Seljuk minor as Hittite at 2000BC to raid Babylonia (And usually, Nineveh is already founded = Capital move to Nineveh = Assyrian Empire)..
gone
and spawn as Seljuk at the planned date with the Seljuk flag etc, ofc![]()
Yeah...
Hittites play a big role in Ancient Near East..
And the dumb barbarian just can't replicate their aggressiveness, IMO