Avalanche of some sort?
A curious trial took place in Austria:
apparently, two aristorocrats, one of which has slighted the other through some kind of dishonouring, had taken it upon themselves to enact a duel, up in the Austrian Alps.
According to the remaining defendant's testimony, the two men had climbed onto different mountains, a mile apart, and were to, at exactly 6:00, fire off a shot at each other.
According to the sole witness, a climber just below the peak, he heard a single, polyphonic crack, and climbed to find the body of the dead man, a single round in his head, and a single round expended from his rifle.
A duel, would, of course, not be a murder trial, as it would be consentual, so manslaughter would be a more fitting charge. However, the state decided to prosecute for murder. Why?
A curious trial took place in Austria:
apparently, two aristorocrats, one of which has slighted the other through some kind of dishonouring, had taken it upon themselves to enact a duel, up in the Austrian Alps.
According to the remaining defendant's testimony, the two men had climbed onto different mountains, a mile apart, and were to, at exactly 6:00, fire off a shot at each other.
According to the sole witness, a climber just below the peak, he heard a single, polyphonic crack, and climbed to find the body of the dead man, a single round in his head, and a single round expended from his rifle.
A duel, would, of course, not be a murder trial, as it would be consentual, so manslaughter would be a more fitting charge. However, the state decided to prosecute for murder. Why?
think i've got the answer to this one.
The surviver fired his rifle early, as the climber would have otherwise heard two distinct gun shots. He heard only one though and was right by the dead dueler. It takes sound about 5 seconds to travel a mile, so the surviver fired his rifle that much earlier.
edit: grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
One of them shot before 6.00. The witness heard a single polyphnoic crack but one of the guys were a mile farther from the witness so the sound had travelled for several seconds before it reached the witness meaning that he had fired the bullet several seconds earlier (about 4,8s earlier to be precise).
A curious trial took place in Austria:
apparently, two aristorocrats, one of which has slighted the other through some kind of dishonouring, had taken it upon themselves to enact a duel, up in the Austrian Alps.
According to the remaining defendant's testimony, the two men had climbed onto different mountains, a mile apart, and were to, at exactly 6:00, fire off a shot at each other.
According to the sole witness, a climber just below the peak, he heard a single, polyphonic crack, and climbed to find the body of the dead man, a single round in his head, and a single round expended from his rifle.
A duel, would, of course, not be a murder trial, as it would be consentual, so manslaughter would be a more fitting charge. However, the state decided to prosecute for murder. Why?
Spoiler :What would the other one tell me to do?
Then do the opposite.
Or, if one always lies, get him to make a statement without asking a question. Like, punch him and see if he says, "that didn't hurt!"
What's the sound of one hand clapping?
You mean no sound? Wrong.