We have now had 3 days with two such events (8 June, 9 May and 20 February)
In Las Vegas, the mythical good guy with the gun ended up getting killed.
Does the 2nd amendment actually support gun rights?
Wasn't it intended to give the States' rights to raise militias rather free firearm ownership?
2nd Amendment said:A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
I don't see that. If the comma wasn't there you'd have a poorly constructed sentence; nothing more, imo.
Not according to Constitutional attorneys apparently. They seems to think the comma makes all the difference in the world.
Does the 2nd amendment actually support gun rights?
Wasn't it intended to give the States' rights to raise militias rather free firearm ownership?
Was it really?I think the point is validly made that the first thing fascists did was go for the guns.
Germany and Italy at least.
J
Fascists certainly don't seem averse to guns, that's for sure. It's almost like their signature trait.