Red Dwarf Mafia: The Smeggening [Game Thread - Concluded]

[Kennigit]

You do understand that random will create reactions as well? And "random" is a robust methodology statistically, and people will reveal bias. It may not be as pronounced as uncontrollable wagon but probably provides more data that gets shown over long term than like 3 or so wagons that may get promoted early on most likely townies.

Cfc has edit timestamp when edits are made

majiffy

 

[Majiffy]

Please, give us an example of how speedwagons are better than tight lynches. Multiple preferably as we've been doing this for years over here. Apparently, I for one am dumb, stupid, am generally wrong and require your enlightenment.

Considering I didn't mention competing bandwagons whatsoever I think your post here is a pile of steaming .

And I've been playing mafia in a number of mediums for over 8 years so keep waving your "look how experienced I am!" flag, it's really effective.

 

[Zack]

Zack still waiting on a reply to this.

Silently voting me is an unacceptable answer to my query.

Oh, because you're clearly so interested in intellectual discourse here?

 

[Kennigit]

Cfc doesnt jump on ninja edits for like <1 minute grammatical corrections

People are human.

 

[Arakhor]

And I've been playing mafia in a number of mediums for over 8 years so keep waving your "look how experienced I am!" flag, it's really effective.

So, only slightly more effective than you doing the very same thing on a new forum.

 

[Majiffy]

You do understand that random will create reactions as well?

Such as?

It may not be as pronounced as uncontrollable wagon

So you admit there are more effective methodologies but you continue to use inferior ones?

Good to know. You're in my stupid book!

but probably provides more data that gets shown over long term than like 3 or so wagons that may get promoted early on most likely townies.

That's a lot of ifs and mays and probablys.

You should probably just refrain from posting if your argument involves a lot of hypotheticals.

Cfc has edit timestamp when edits are made

He admitted to it.

And it doesn't make it any less shady.

There's a reason the sweeping majority of online mafia sites disallow post editing.

majiffy

Tell me more about how I'm scum.

 

[Majiffy]

Oh, because you're clearly so interested in intellectual discourse here?

Sure.

Cfc doesnt jump on ninja edits for like <1 minute grammatical corrections

People are human.

And editing posts in a game that requires the accuracy of history to look back at and reference is shady.

Grok?

So, only slightly more effective than you doing the very same thing on a new forum.

I still haven't seen a single person disprove or even attempt to argue against my points here.

So no, not the same thing. Because I provided an argument.

 

[Majiffy]

Still waiting, Zack.

 

[Arakhor]

Yet you felt the need to wave your "I've been playing for over eight years" flag, whilst simultaneously telling BL off for doing it.

 

[Kennigit]

Cfc has timestamps for "post editted" when it is like after 1 minute. You'll know it is editted and it will be against the rules. Don't freak out over like 20 seconds in a timescale of 48 hour days

You are statistically as likely as anyone else to be scum and i'll be a firm believer in like "fuzzy logic" or "clustering" or "monte carlo" methods

Overtime biases will be shown. Hopefully, if you are scum, your partners may be dumb enough to defend you lol

Otherwise, we will get your data point

 

[Zack]

Still waiting, Zack.

Cool story, tell it at parties.

You're simply wrong. And stupid.

insert dank meme

 

[Majiffy]

Yet you felt the need to wave your "I've been playing for over eight years" flag, whilst simultaneously telling BL off for doing it.

It was a rebuke to your direct claim of "we've been doing this for years here".

But keep playing dumb. Unless you're not playing.

Cfc has timestamps for "post editted" when it is like after 1 minute. You'll know it is editted and it will be against the rules. Don't freak out over like 20 seconds in a timescale of 48 hour days

That doesn't make it any less shady.

You are statistically as likely as anyone else to be scum and i'll be a firm believer in like "fuzzy logic" or "clustering" or "monte carlo" methods

Statistically it's more likely I'm town.

And ok, keep being a firm believer in stupid. I'm sure you don't believe the ice caps are melting and that vaccines cause autism as well.

They're coming for our guns. Run.

Overtime biases will be shown. Hopefully, if you are scum, your partners may be dumb enough to defend you lol

Hypothetical. What happens when I'm town? What use do you get from this?

Otherwise, we will get your data point

What the everliving is this supposed to mean?

 

[Backwards Logic]

Well, he created some discussion. I'll give him that. Too bad the scum are just going to hide in all of the flak he's created.

And competing bandwagons is not the same as recklessly out of control bandwagons with no brakes, but feel free to change your definitions as you see fit. You still haven't added anything meaningful to the conversation, and I'm convinced you're just trolling for the sake of trolling.

You want a runaway wagon with no brakes? Fine. I'm happy to oblige. Let's see how many scum players it reveals.

Majiffy.

 

[Majiffy]

Cool story, tell it at parties.

You're simply wrong. And stupid.

insert dank meme

Tell me how I'm wrong.

Dance, monkey, dance.

 

[Majiffy]

Well, he created some discussion. I'll give him that. Too bad the scum are just going to hide in all of the flak he's created.
...
Majiffy.

So the scum are going to hide in the things I created but you're voting me instead of voting the scum.

You're truly living up to your name.

And competing bandwagons is not the same as recklessly out of control bandwagons with no brakes, but feel free to change your definitions as you see fit. You still haven't added anything meaningful to the conversation, and I'm convinced you're just trolling for the sake of trolling.

They're both very useful, in different ways. But that wasn't my argument despite how much you morons would like it to be.

Try reading my posts. This time with your eyeballs open.

 

[Arakhor]

Actually, that was BL's claim, not mine, but I'm playing dumb apparently.

I'm happy to have a runaway wagon though, if you're going to continue to lower the enjoyment of this thread. Vote: Majiffy.

 

[Majiffy]

Oh was this about enjoyment? I thought this was a logic game that piggybacks off the reading of emotional tells and reactions.

My mistake.

 

[Zack]

Oh was this about enjoyment? I thought this was a logic game that piggybacks off the reading of emotional tells and reactions.

My mistake.

You're surprised people play games for enjoyment?

 

[Majiffy]

You want to play games for enjoyment pick up Mario.

I play this for the challenge.

 

[Zack]

You want to play games for enjoyment pick up Mario.

I play this for the challenge.

Not mutually exclusive.

Plenty of people play Mario games competitively, in any case.