1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Referee Q&A

Discussion in 'Eagles' started by X-Worf, Dec 9, 2010.

  1. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
    Sorry, i overlocked this turn log.
     
  2. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
    Damned!

    At the other team I posted this link:
    http://www.civforum.de/showthread.php?p=3943558#post3943558

    Please check it. At the moment there are two main options:
    A) Rommel is out of DG in confirming with the rules. (only rejoining his old team is possible)
    B) In accordance with all teams he can be:
    B1) A full third referee
    B2) A assistant of referees. (check turn lock/clock, but no voice on internal referee polls)
    B2) It's allowed to him join another team

    I red cyc's statement. I need a team dicision, a statement of the team captain (it's maybe the same) and all other statements like cyc's posts. If we follow any B-option, it's imtortant, that it's okay for all members. The first priority is the DG and that all teams and players thrust each other to stay fair. To help one "quitted" player is not the priority.

    A Rommel statement:
     
  3. Calis

    Calis on time

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,967
    Location:
    Germany GMT+1
    As we are not the team he is about to leave (or left already), I am fine with either B2 and B3 (I think you wanted to call it B3) :)
     
  4. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
    And one item more: the turn clock discusion (this and the following posts)
    (Reasoning: This way, the turn clock is easier to calculate manually and easier to read.)
     
  5. Cyc

    Cyc Looking for the door...

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    14,736
    Location:
    Behind you
    As far as Rommel goes, my final statement is posted here. It was posted when I was still officially Team Captain, I believe. Yes, it was - just checked. I also believe Rommel only requested position B2 (the first B2) :) so that's what I approved. If Rommel wants to participate more as Ref or player, that's fine also.

    On the turn clock issue, I'm not sure how many Eagles are following the discussion, other than Calis and myself. There is a new Team Captain now, Sparthage, and I am willing to bet that he would approve of the change to rule 10.2. The change will make things less complicated and easier to post/read.
     
  6. Sparthage

    Sparthage Fighting Tyranny

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,749
    Location:
    New Lunar Republic
    @X-Worf and Others: I've been following the conversation on and off and was aware of the situation. I saw Cyc's comment soon after it was posted and I agree with him I also recall a comment about how there are more posts in the CivForum private forums and Cyc's highly amusing response :lol:, now if I can only find it...

    Also, the Rule Change is fine. I thought for a second you were discussing the Rommel Referee issue.
     
  7. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
  8. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
    The CivForum is hacked. Stop of turn clock and save handover.
     
  9. Calis

    Calis on time

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,967
    Location:
    Germany GMT+1
    I already recognized it. Ugly movie. :thumbsdown:

    Thank you anyway!

    Please keep us informed.
     
  10. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
    CivForum is back. Interruption of turn clock on 3. May from 0-24 o'clock. The ISDG continues now.
     
  11. Sparthage

    Sparthage Fighting Tyranny

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,749
    Location:
    New Lunar Republic
    That's good.
     
  12. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
    Hi Eagles,

    the ISDG needs your turn:
    There are three options:

    A) Eagles plays the turn within the next 2 hours. (Time clock continues with a negative value - this is an exception)
    B) Eagles use her 2nd time out
    C) I play the turn in 2 hours or tomorrow morning
     
  13. Cyc

    Cyc Looking for the door...

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    14,736
    Location:
    Behind you
    Worf is gone until June 6th.
     
  14. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
    Hey guys, this move wasn't fine. U entered Küche's territory.

    RoP or declearing of war is neccessary now.
     
  15. Calis

    Calis on time

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,967
    Location:
    Germany GMT+1
    Did Kueche complain about this move? I did not read the threads, yet?

    There was no hostile intend in this move.

    I will clarify with Kueche.
     
  16. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
    Until the end of your turn RoP has to be agreed or war declared.
     
  17. Calis

    Calis on time

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,967
    Location:
    Germany GMT+1
    :salute: :bowdown:
     
  18. Calis

    Calis on time

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,967
    Location:
    Germany GMT+1
    Is it necessary to have an ingame RoP. Or is an agreement in the embassy enough?
     
  19. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
    However, if it happend with hostile intend or not, 6.2 is a clear rule. In the strict sense we would have to repeat the last turn and I would have to impose a restriction on Eagles.
    An embassy agreement would be sufficient.
     
  20. X-Worf

    X-Worf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Hamburg
    In this case the compliance to your contract/agreement needs to be kept. (instead of a restriction)
     

Share This Page