Riot 2 Get Amnesty

Formaldehyde

Both Fair And Balanced
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
33,999
Location
USA #1
Three months before they would have been freed anyway...

2 Members of Riot Freed Under Amnesty Law

MOSCOW — Two women from the punk group Riot serving two-year prison terms for staging a protest performance against President Vladimir V. Putin in Moscow’s main cathedral were released on Monday under a new amnesty law.

The case of Maria Alyokhina, who was set free from a prison in the western city of Nizhny Novgorod on Monday morning, and her co-defendant, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, who was released later in the day in the Siberian city of Krasnoyarsk, had drawn international condemnation of Russia’s human rights record. Critics said their prosecution and relatively stiff sentences represented a brutal repression of free speech.

In a telephone interview on Monday, Ms. Alyokhina said that she did not want amnesty, and that officials had forced her to leave the prison. She said that the amnesty program was designed to make Mr. Putin look benevolent, and that she would have preferred to serve the remainder of her sentence.

“I think this is an attempt to improve the image of the current government, a little, before the Sochi Olympics — particularly for the Western Europeans,” she said, referring to the Winter Games Russia is hosting in February. “But I don’t consider this humane or merciful.”

She added, “This is a lie.”

“We didn’t ask for any pardon,” Ms. Alyokhina said. “I would have sat here until the end of my sentence because I don’t need mercy from Putin.” The women had been jailed since March 2012 and would have been released within the next three months.

On Thursday, hours after the adoption of the amnesty law, Mr. Putin said that he would also grant clemency to Russia’s most famous prisoner, Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky, the former Yukos oil tycoon. Mr. Khodorkovsky was released from a penal colony later that night and flown to Berlin, where he held a news conference on Sunday.

While Mr. Putin has described the amnesty law and Mr. Khodorkovsky’s pardon as efforts to make the Russian criminal justice system more humane, it has also underscored his singular authority in this country and, to critics, the very arbitrariness of the Russian legal process that rights groups have long denounced.

The two women were convicted, along with a third woman, Yekaterina Samutsevich, whose sentence was later overturned on appeal, of hooliganism motivated by religious hatred. The women had insisted repeatedly that they were motivated not by antireligious sentiment but by opposition to Mr. Putin and to Russia’s political system.

They said they had chosen the church, the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, for their “punk prayer” to criticize the political support for Mr. Putin and the Kremlin shown by the patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church, Kirill 1.

The Russian Parliament, at Mr. Putin’s direction, passed the sweeping amnesty law last week, and the legislation was also expected to bring the release of the Greenpeace activists recently arrested while protesting oil exploration in the Arctic.

Others who stand to benefit from the law include defendants accused of crimes in connection with an antigovernment protest that turned violent after Mr. Putin’s re-election as president.

The members of Riot, the Greenpeace activists and Mr. Khodorkovsky had all become international symbols for critics of the Russian system, and could well have been the subject of protests and demonstrations during the Winter Olympics, which will be held in the southern Russian city of Sochi.

It is not clear, however, whether Mr. Putin was motivated by the Olympics or some other factors. As he prepares to enter his 15th year as Russia’s pre-eminent political figure, he seems increasingly confident and in control, though he may soon face serious challenges as a result of the country’s slowing economy. The pattern of high-profile defendants being the first to benefit from the new amnesty law seemed to support Ms. Alyokhina’s assertion of a public relations campaign on the part of the Kremlin.

Mark G. Denisov, who works for the Public Supervisory Commission in Krasnoyarsk, which is responsible for monitoring prison conditions and prisoners’ rights, said he expected that about 1,000 convicts would ultimately be released under the amnesty program out of some 23,000 held in jails in the region. But he said that the process was slow and that so far he was not aware of anyone going free other than Ms. Tolokonnikova.

Anticipation of the release of Ms. Tolokonnikova, the best known of the Riot protesters, had been building since last week, when it became clear that the amnesty law approved by Parliament would cut short her sentence.

Ms. Tolokonnikova’s transfer to Siberia in November was not seen as an effort to punish her further. Instead, it brought her closer to her grandmother who lives in Krasnoyarsk, where Ms. Tolokonnikova spent many summers as a child.

Do you think Putin is honestly trying to reform the Russian penal system, which has gotten a lot of negative publicity for being so repressive and authoritarian? Or is it just a PR campaign to help prop up Russia's image prior to the Olympics?
 
It's just a PR campaign prior to the Olympics. End of story.

Poor P-riot!

Does this mean we get to see more of their marker-bedaubed naughts, again?
 
I've never been sure of the facts abut this riot thing. Did they or did they not break into a church to do their little stunt?
 
How do you break into an open church? Their "crime" was "hooliganism".
 
You could lock it first. Or maybe hunt around for a locked door to break into?

Or maybe just take your top off, and barge past some cleric trying to keep you out?
 
How do you break into an open church?

I've never been sure of the facts abut this riot thing.

There was a reason I was asking. I didn't know if the church was open at the time. I didn't know if they had permission from the church leader to pull their little stunt. I didn't know. I mean, depending on the specifics leading up to their arrest, they may well deserve to have had their butts sitting in jail all this time.
 
Obviously a PR move, but not a particularly clever or effective one, because of its transparency and half-heartedness. No one is going to change how they think about the Russian government and the Russian justice system because of this. If anything it underscores how unjust the whole situation is in the first place.
 
Just another PR stunt to make Russia appear to be on the moral high ground.
 
There was a reason I was asking. I didn't know if the church was open at the time. I didn't know if they had permission from the church leader to pull their little stunt. I didn't know. I mean, depending on the specifics leading up to their arrest, they may well deserve to have had their butts sitting in jail all this time.
It isn't all that difficult to determine. After all, it isn't like it hasn't had massive international coverage. It was even discussed at length in this forum, but I couldn't find the original thread.

What's happened to the Green Peace lot?
According to what is stated in the article and posted in the OP, they will also be released.
 
Well, I'm not losing enough sleep to care about a couple of hooligan troublemaker singers getting jailed to go searching for it. That's why I was asking, so if you don't want to enlighten me, that's fine, I'll just assume Ruskies were in the right for jailing them for breaking and entering or vandalism or whatever.
 
*sigh*
I don't believe they broke in. But it's hard to be sure after this time has elapsed. (It would take time to dig up the suitable references, if you could find them even.) They certainly weren't charged with breaking in. So that should be a clue.

The trial of the three women started in Moscow's Khamovniki District Court on July 30, 2012.[76] Charged with "premeditated hooliganism performed by an organized group of people motivated by religious hatred or hostility,"[77] they faced possible sentences of up to seven years imprisonment. In early July, a poll conducted in Moscow found that half of the respondents opposed the trial while 36 percent supported it; the rest being undecided.[78] Putin stated that while he saw "nothing good" about the band's protest, "Nonetheless, I don't think that they should be judged so harshly for this."[79]

The defendants pleaded not guilty, saying that they had not meant their protest to be offensive.[53][80] "We sang part of the refrain 'Holy [excrement deleted]'," Tolokonnikova said in court. "I am sorry if I offended anyone with this. It is an idiomatic expression, related to the previous verse — about the fusion of Moscow patriarchy and the government. 'Holy ' is our evaluation of the situation in the country. This opinion is not blasphemy."[53] Their lawyers stated that the circumstances of the case had revived the Soviet-era tradition of the show trial.[81][82] On August 15, 20 protesters wearing balaclavas gathered in support of Riot at Christ the Savior Cathedral, and held up placards reading "Blessed are the merciful". Cathedral guards quickly moved against the protesters, trying to detain them and taking off their balaclavas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/_Riot
 
Do you think Putin is honestly trying to reform the Russian penal system, which has gotten a lot of negative publicity for being so repressive and authoritarian?
I don't count amnesties as reforms, they're arbitrary almost by definition. Putin probably thinks that releasing them would divert the attention from the systemic flaws of our penal system.

I didn't know if the church was open at the time. I didn't know if they had permission from the church leader to pull their little stunt. I didn't know. I mean, depending on the specifics leading up to their arrest, they may well deserve to have had their butts sitting in jail all this time.
The church was open at the time, however, they did not have any permission in order to do their, um, performance. 2 years is definitely too high for their hooliganism, though. Since their song included the "O Mother of God, chase Putin away" line, Putin probably took it too personally.

I don't have much sympathy with provocateurs like this group, but I have even less sympathy with the fundy types who raaage at them.
 
It's just a PR campaign prior to the Olympics. End of story.

Poor P-riot!

Does this mean we get to see more of their marker-bedaubed naughts, again?

You may be confusing the legitimate artists and protesters with the paid, professional entitled young scandalists.
Two different groups. Two different things.
Obviously a PR move, but not a particularly clever or effective one, because of its transparency and half-heartedness. No one is going to change how they think about the Russian government and the Russian justice system because of this. If anything it underscores how unjust the whole situation is in the first place.
I suppose a great number of Russian will see the recent amnesty wave as "Putin is so soft, how can them foreigners be upset with him?!".
 
Back
Top Bottom