well, Austria is a realy tough one for me now.
if i was playing it as a player i would definetly go to war with Rome over what he just did.

@ Erez
some good reasons for it:
1. austria's other borders are prety safe. Turkey and russia seem to have just started something, so are unlikely to pay much attention to Austria. and germany is an npc (i know that's not a fair reason, but hey, its there)
2. the war would be closer to my capitol then his so i'd be able to get reinforcement to the fights faster.
3. Rome seems to have started to have problems one the France/Spain side, further giving austria an advantage.
however, as an NPC there are a few factors that make that an unwise course:
1. while i know that i wouldnt cheat (read erez's orders before doing austria's) and i think most people here (including erez) would believe me that i didnt, there would still be a window of doubt that i do NOT want to open up.
2. with me also controling germany, it makes it very difficult to say wheather austria is abusing the fact that it (in reality) knows what germany will do. not to mention that erez has no chance of convincing germany to ally with him against austria (i will NOT have two npcs that i'm controling fight, the headache that causes is not worth it).
3. and he's apologised for doing it. though i cant realy believe he didnt think austria would mind having TWO territories next to its capitol taken over by another nation, you never know.
if atleast one of the 3 reasons NOT to go to war wasnt there, i'd proly go to war (like if someone took germany), but as is, i'll just have austria stay the isolated NPC that is is.
now COME ON SOMEONE take over one of the two NPCs.