Road to War - Historical

kiwitt · Oct 5, 2009

*** Over 10,000 Downloads ***
Thank You All !!!

NOTE: If you like Road to War - Historical, be sure to check out my new scenario based on Modern Earth as it is today. It has the same level of detail, but on a modern and global scale.

Introduction
After highlighting my concerns with Dales Mod here and here I decided I would try to improve it. Dales Mod is designed for Playability where any nation can try to win. My mod is aimed more at realism. i.e. Germany having better Techs and Training than most, Russia having many more men, USA having much more production and England having the wonderful "Battle of Britain" pilots. I have attached the changes I have made to Dale's Road to War. As alluded to in the original thread this version will build on the "flavor" by;

* Enhanced the planes and ships, by providing more unique units.
* Additional unit class refinements, thereby providing more control to the amount of the units each nation can build
* More wonders to the game and place them in their respective capitals.
* Single install file

* Extensive Alpha testing prior to BETA release (see post 2 below) - thanks to FNP, Supermarine2000, pemery87

1936 - Road to War - Historical
I have been working on Dales' 1936 - RTW - European Scenario for nearly a year. I initially looked at the unit graphics in version 1.01 (0.10), but that was not where I was looking for my enthusiasm. I wanted there to be some realism in the mod. So starting in version 1.02, I changed my focus to Divisions, Corps and Armies. This was the best thing I did and will continue with later releases. Version 1.03 was a complete re-write for patch 3.19.

This scenario goes for 20 years (480 turns) - 1956

NOTE: Select Historical Play only as this is a "Realism" mod
But you can still play "random" (don't expect all events to occur) or even try your luck in "Open-Play"

Versions
1.03.x - Earlier Versions for 3.17
1.03.9.xx-1.04.xx - Development complete for 3.19 - (Now a single install file - approximately 300 MB)
1.04.A1 - Alpha 1 Released - 11 May 2010 - closed testing
1.04.A2 - Alpha 2 Released - 22 May 2010 - closed testing
1.04.B1 - Beta 1 Released - 17 June 2010 - public testing
1.04.B2 - Beta 2 Released - 11 July 2010 - public testing
1.04.RC - Release Candidate - 4 August 2010 - public testing
1.04 - Initial Release - 12 September 2010
1.04.a - Scenario update released - 02 January 2011 - requiring 1.04
1.04.a - get it here (includes updated scenario) - 17 August 2015
1.04.SP1-Alpha closed testing - 16 April 2011
1.04.SP1-Alpha open testing - 15 July 2011
1.04.SP1-Beta - to be released when Alpha Testing is completed
1.04.SP1 - When public Beta Testing is completed.
1.05 - Pacific Scenario - Development not yet started - maybe canceled
1.06 - Global Scenario - Unlikely
see - The Road to War - Historical Edition 2.0 for future developments - cancelled
1.04b - Small map update released 30 January 2019
1.05 - Significant bug fix version - released 25 March 2019
1.06 - https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/road-to-war-historical-1-06.667315/
1.07 - Released - added Operation Overload and Operation Husky landing zones for the Allies 1.07 can be downloaded here
1.08 - In development - see for details: https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/road-to-war-historical.337742/post-16720192
1.10 - The Road to War Ultimate Edition for 3.17 and updated for 3.19 by deanj
1.20 - An Ultimate Historic Edition was planned, but due to the increased complexity of a Global Map, it is not something I am ready to take on.

System Requirements
1: Civilization IV
2: Beyond the Sword Expansion
3: Patch 3.19
4: Due to the increased graphics, a good fast processor and graphics card is required
5: Windows 7 64 is recommended as is 6 GB of RAM or more.

This "Rise of Mankind tip" may help lesser machines (e.g. WinXP 32bit.)
(I am currently developing/playing on a Windows 7 x64 Ultimate, Core i7 920 , 6 GB of RAM with HD 4870 512 Graphics Card)
NOTE: Not compatible with the Road to War 1.1 UE, but can be installed in it's own folder.

DISCLAIMER: THIS MINI-MOD IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH FIRAXIS GAMES OR 2K GAMES IN ANY WAY. USE OF THIS MINI-MOD IS AT THE USER'S DISCRETION AND FIRAXIS GAMES, 2K GAMES AND THE MAKERS OF THIS MINI-MOD ARE NOT LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES. BY DOWNLOADING AND INSTALLING THIS MINI-MOD THE USER ACCEPTS THESE TERMS AND ACCEPTS THAT USE OF THE MINI-MOD IS AT THEIR DISCRETION.

https://forums.civfanatics.com/resources/road-to-war-historical.13097/ via Civfanatics.

Installation Notes
Simply extract the file into your \Beyond the Sword\Mods\ folder and load the new scenario.

The way I start it is to simply click on the "C:\GAMES\CIV4\Beyond the Sword\Mods\The Road to War - Historical\PublicMaps\1936 - Europe (Historical - 1.07).CivBeyondSwordWBSave" file. It will then automatically load the mod.

NOTE: Where I have installed CIV4 on my Windows 7/10/11 PC.

Recommended way to play "Hot Seat Mode" as this allows better control of your allies. To Set Human player for

AXIS;
Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria and Czechoslovakia (Build up troops for Germany when they are annexed), Italy - (Activity in Afrika and Albania), Finland (Early battle with Russia)

ALLIES;
UK, USA, Poland, France, Lowlands, Scandinavia (Norway/Denmark), Greece, Canada,

RUSSIA;
Soviet Russia, Albania, Yugoslavia,

NEUTRAL;
Baltic, Sweden, Turkey, Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, Iran, Arabia, Arabian Rebels (Barbarians)
Set all other players to AI. i.e. If you select AXIS set all ALLIES and NEUTRAL to AI, If you select ALLIES, set AXIS and NEUTRAL to AI, If you select NEUTRAL, set AXIS and ALLIES to AI.

kiwitt · Oct 5, 2009

Development Fixes

Spoiler :

Many of these following proposed changes will now be incorporated into The Road to War - Historical Edition 2.0 - now actively developed

Spoiler :

kiwitt · Oct 5, 2009

Map
As noted below, new cities have been added. There have also been changes made to the map as well. e.g. Bremen is now a coastal city. A number of rivers have been added and a lot or railroads and roads have been removed, most significantly from the Russian Front. More resources have been added as well.

New for this version
* Convoy routes across the Atlantic
* New minor nations to replace some of the barbarians in the middle-east
* Switzerland
* Arabia
* Persia
* Portugal
* Govt-in-Exiles

Cities
A significant amount of work has gone into adding more cities and also making sure the city size is appropriate. The initial "culture" for each city is now based on how many 1,000's of citizens were living there in or around 1940 (depending on what data was available). I have also added "Rebel" towns and cities, especially in the Middle East, which will keep the British, Italians and French occupied for a while. I have also added more cities closer together. e.g. Holland and the Ruhr Area

I have now also added wonders to the map and appropriate bonuses given. Most are located in the appropriate cities, but there are also some held by rebels, etc. So it is worth exploring to get these cities as well. These wonders also give bonus buildings. (see civilopedia for details)

Each city now has a number of initial buildings equal to it's city size minus one. i.e. a city size of 3 has 2 initial buildings. Construction of buildings must now follow a set order, which will ensure that the city has the appropriate infrastructure support for it's size. Each Buildings gives differing bonuses for experience, science, culture, food and money (see civilopedia for details). Goods Factory produce "Food" to help the denser cities.

Cities have seen the re-introduction of "culture", which equals initially the population size in thousands. While culture was essentially removed from the original RtW, except an arbitrary one thousand, when a city was taken. Cities defensive bonus have been increased based on size of the city population.

New for this version
* Single "Govts-in-Exile" towns in far away places
* Single Significant Cities added in other places of conflict (Albania, Norway, Afrika, Monte Cassino)

Buildings
Military Building will have increased -negative health
Coal Plant no longer produces oil - making oil more critical again

Wonders
Many additional wonders have been added, which act mostly as tourist attractions. However, some modern buildings have been added which give additional bonuses. e.g. Westpoint, Sandhurst, KGB, OSS, Bletchley Park, etc.

kiwitt · Oct 5, 2009

Initial Units
The 1936 Scenario includes all units the existed in September 1939 for most nations, except Russia which has all units that exists in June1941. Nations can build some units already, based on their initial tech level, e.g. England can build some type ships and fighters, Germany can build Panzer Divisions and Corps and Russia can already build new Armies.

Most significant Generals have been included for both major and minor nations, and some have already being pre-assigned to units. If the General had achieved sufficient rank or fame, he has been included. All of them have been placed on the map, within the borders of the relevant countries. Leaders have also been added as Prophets and can also be used to settle in the game. They don't play a major part, but added them for more favour.

Initial Battleships, Carriers and Cruisers now have unique names. They also have unique promotions, based on their speed, range, and armament. This will be further enhanced in version 1.0.4 and later versions. I have also changed the combat values of the fighters and bombers, but this is still a work in progress and hope to refine it in time for 1.0.4 release.

Unit Details
I have now created unit stats for all significant formations for the major powers involved in WWII , i.e. Germany, Russia, France, England, Italy, USA, China, Japan.

The combat values and bonuses are based on the actual formation make-up, i.e. number of tanks, infantry, artillery and anti-tank strengths and combined into various values and bonuses. The amount of units a nation can build is now also limited to approximately historical limits. I have therefore limited the amount of artillery available as most were inherent in these higher level units. (see civilopedia for details)

Each unique unit now has a unit name, so while you are playing you can follow your favourite division, corps or army or even army group. Some Units also have a Generals name in brackets next to the unit. This will help if you want to add a General to lead the unit directly.

I have included new graphics for major nation units and included the models for the "King Tiger", "Centurion", "JS-II", "T-34/76" and restored the "Panther" to the game. Even Minor Nations have now Unique Units.

See Civilopedia for details

kiwitt · Oct 5, 2009

Notes
RE: A 1939 Scenario

Dale said:
I know some people love the 39 maps, but in all honesty it was never my intent to make them the important part of the mod. It's "The Road to War" not "World War II".

french civ fan said:
...36 maps give you more control over how your nation leads into WW2...what units do you want for example..and on a 36 map you can do it

Credits
Alpha-Testers: Supermarine2000, fireclaw722, FNP
Beta-Testers: (see posts later in this thread)

Dale - Original Author of "The Road to War"

Dale said:
Your work to improve on RtW is fantastic.

Dale said:
But what kiwitt has done is take my core and expand the realism to form a version of RtW that is pleasing for the hard-cores. For that, kiwitt gets a dip of my hat.

Snafusmith - Major Producer of WWII units

snafusmith said:
Awesome, go for it!

AsioAsioAsio, FNP, Capun, Gramps, Charles, Kesselbrut, UrbanTiger, GeneralMatt, Nuvoloblu, Sharick, KrugerPritz, slaxton, Dutchking, Xenomorph, nudden, and many others.

Special mention to Maeriaek and The J for War Prizes and ReSpawn MOD Comp

kiwitt · Oct 5, 2009

Development Milestones
24 Oct 2009 - Conversion from "The Road to War - KiwiTT" to "The Road to War - Historical" Completed
03 Jan 2010 - Version 1.03.9xx development started
27 Jan 2010 - Bugs fixed from 1.03.3x
12 Feb 2010 - Initial Aircraft,Battleships,Cruisers Graphics added
21 Feb 2010 - 400 individual ship specifications researched
28 Feb 2010 - 200 aircraft types researched so far
08 Mar 2010 - Added, Switzerland, Persia, Arabia and Portugal - A birthday present for me - LOL
20 Mar 2010 - Sorting through downloaded model graphics to determine best quality
30 Mar 2010 - Completed Selection of Unit Artwork
04 Apr 2010 - Generals, Cavalry, Infantry Added
07 Apr 2010 - Major Nations Tanks Added and scaled appropriately
14 Apr 2010 - Minor Nations Divisions, Corps, Armies now represented by the number of actual men
20 Apr 2010 - Infantry completed
23 Apr 2010 - Tanks completed
04 May 2010 - Aircraft completed
08 May 2010 - Ships Completed
11 May 2010 - 1.04 Alpha 1 Version completed

16 May 2010 - Playtesting revealed serious error
22 May 2010 - 1.04 Alpha 2 Version released
17 Jun 2010 - 1.04 Beta 1 Version released
11 Jul 2010 - 1.04 Beta 2 Version Released
03 Aug 2010 - 1.04 Release Candidate 1 Released
05 Aug 2010 - 1.04 Release Candidate 2 Released
22 Aug 2010 - 1.04 Preview Released
12 Sep 2010 - 1.04 Historical Released
15 Sep 2010 - !!!!!!!!!!!! Last Day for any Major Fixes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
25 Sep 2010 - Target Date for last application of fixes
26 Sep 2010 - 1.04 Historical Final Version released
02 Jan 2011 - Updated European Scenario released
16 Apr 2011 - 1.04 SP1 Alpha Released to closed group
15 Jul 2011 - 1.04 SP1 Alpha Released to public
16 Sep 2011 - 1.04 SP1 Alpha now no longer being worked on
18 Sep 2011 - 2.0 is now the future path - less is more.

FNP · Nov 4, 2009

Additional unit comments:
If you intend to get as detailed with the Naval units as you have with land forces, here are the ship classes that might be representative of British/US/Soviet/French/German/Italian navies:

British / US / Soviet / French / German / Italian
BB King George V / Iowa / Sevastopol / Richelieu / Bismarck / Littorio
CA Kent / Baltimore / Maxim Gorkiy / Suffren / Blucher / Trento
CV Illustrious / Essex / [none] / [Joffre] / [Graf Zeppelin] / Aquila
DD Tribal / Fletcher / Project 7 / L'Adroit / Z 23 / Navigatore
PF River / [none] / [none] / River / SG 1 / Pegaso
SS U / Balao / SC / Redoutable / Type VII / Adua

All navies had a wide mix of ship types of varying ages, especially BB and CA types. The above ship classes represent either the class being produced circa 1940 (eg King George BB) or the class with the most numbers of ships in WWII (eg. Z 23 DD / Fletcher DD/ Tribal DD).

kiwitt · Nov 4, 2009

Excellent feeback. I will incorporate these classes into the game.

From a Message

I sent a post on the open thread recommending Ship classes you might use. Unfortunately, the columns got scrambled by the text editor. I'll go back and see if I can edit the original post.

I'll also look over the aircraft types and see what might be reasonably representative of aircraft in service during the period.

In RTW, a different scale map is used for the Pacific. That almost forces the use of two different Units XML files in order to represent reasonable aircraft combat radius/ unit range in the Pacific and Europe maps.

I can probably do this one unit XML file, but with different Civ files and different unique units. e.g. Spitfire_EU, Spitfire_PAC, Spitfire

fireclaw722 · Nov 8, 2009

I have Suggestion regarding Units:

Snipers:

Strength: 3
Movement: 3
Starts With: Drill I, II, III(due to excesive amounts of training)
City Defence I
Gets +2 First Strike Chances

Geurillas:

Strength: 10
Movement: 1
Starts With: Geurilla I,II,III
Is hidden(Completly) while in a forest or jungle

U-Boats:
Replace Submarine/Attack Submarine
Unique to Germany
Strength: ??
Movement: 7
Targets Merchant Ships first
Gets:
100% against Merchant Ships
100% against Destroyers
100% against Cruisers

Resistance Units:

When Poland and France are captured and fall they should be able to get some Troops
every once in a while to show the Resistance to German occupation.

kiwitt · Nov 9, 2009

Snipers are probably too small to make an impact against a division. Resistance Fighters really only affected "Civil order" requiring a division to station in a city, to reduce it's rebelion time. While they definitely made an impact they could not destroy a "division". Guerillas Units are a possibility, Just not sure how yet.

RE: U boats. I have currently in 0.39x made Attack Submarine class for German able to use ocean squares and normal sunbmarines a limited to coastal areas and convoy routes.

kiwitt · Nov 11, 2009

FNP said:
via email ...
With respect to naval units, I have no ideas yet on how you might fix ship ranges [if your goal is to be historically accurate] ... Atlantic ship convoys [either the fast or the slow convoys] could transit Halifax to Liverpool in a fortnight. A fast attack carrier force with underway replenishment could cross the Pacific in a fortnight. There is a playability mismatch between land units and sea units with respect to relative speed / range. .

I may remove the "Blitz" promotion from ships. Giving ships massive movement distances, like proposed, would make them quite different to land units, but they would then also play quite a significant role.

kiwitt · Nov 11, 2009

Code:

RTW type	Suggested Type
vanilla	
vanilla	
vanilla	
vanilla	
vanilla	
vanilla	
Bf 109	Bf 109
FW 190	FW 190
ME 262	ME P1101
CR 42	CR 42
G 55	G 55
Caproni	Re 2007
Hurricane	Hurricane
Spitfire	Spitfire
Meteor	Meteor
MS 406	MS 406
D 520	D 520
Brege 693	Mystere MD 454
P 40	P 40
P 51	P 51
FR 1 	F 86
I 153	I 16
IL 2	YAK 9
MiG 15	MIG 15
KI 27	KI 27
A6M	A6M
KI 84	KI 201
Hawk 75	I 16
I 16	P 40
Vultee	P 51
JU 87	JU 87
JU 88	JU 88
Ar 234	JU 390  / HO XVIIB
BA 88	BA 88
SM 79	SM 79
AR 234	AR 234
Wellington	Wellington
Lancaster	Lancaster
Mosquito	Canberra / Vulcan
Amiot 143	Amiot 143
Amiot 340	Amiot 354
Amiot 354	B17
B 18	B 18
B 17	B 17
B 29	B 29
TB 4	TB 4
IL 4	IL 4
TU 4	TU 4
KI 32	KI 32
G4M	G4M
Kikka	G8N1
TB 4	TB 4
IL 4	IL 4
B 17	B 17

Changes are reflected by highlighted cells in the spreadsheet roposed Aircraft

Types:

Changes that seemed reasonable were made to the basic RTW aircraft types.

The RUS figo I 153 was replaced by the I 16. The I 16 was the mainstay of the soviet AF at the outbreak of the war.fig1 IL-2 was replaced with a YAK-9. The IL-2 was a good ground attack a/c but a very poor fighter.

RTW used the MiG 15 as the Rus fig2, that would make the time frame in the 1950's. As a result, most of the fig2 fighters were changed to reflect MiG 15 counterpart fighters of the 1950's ... GE, IT, JAP were "what if" fighters that were either in design or in prototype stage by 1945. The German ME P1101 was in design and assuming axial flow engine development progressed, the aircraft would have been a counterpart of the MiG 15 and F 86.

Much the same logic was applied to the bom2 units. Axis bom2 units were either designs or prototypes by 1945. Areas highlighted yellow in the spreadsheet reflect a choice remaining to be made between two competing options. The GE fighter choice is the prototype single engine swept wing ME P1101. The P1101 was the "starting point" for Soviet and US single engine fighter designs and represents a logical next step for GE.

In the case of FR, there was very little difference between the Amiot 340 and 354 bomber types. The 354 was comparable to the rest of the bom1 types and was selected as the FR bom1 ... there was no follow on FR bomber so a B 17 was arbitrarily chosen as a fill in for bom2. FR never developed a requirement for long range strategic bombers, eventually deciding to utilise nuclear armed fighter-bombers as their aviation strategic deterrent.

RTW use of a Mosquito for eng bom2 was a mistake. The Mosquito was a tactical attack aircraft and certainly not a step up from the Lancaster. The choice is between the 1950 vintage Canberra medium bomber or the strategic Vulcan bomber.

Chinese aircraft were more or less arbitrary for the entire period since China operated a widely varied collection of lend lease, loan, and volunteer manned aircraft manufactured by the Allies. Toward the end of WWII, China's airforce was more or less up to date. China did not manufacture their own aircraft. Choices for fighters and bombers reflect a representative cross section of the more modern aircraft.

Ranges:

The RTW European map scale is approximately 36 statute miles per square and the Pacific map is approximately 100 statute miles per square. Combat radius for all types was determined for both map scales and is reflected in the spreadsheet. Combat radius represents an average of published ranges for the aircraft. I did not use ferry range figures since they are not representative of a combat loaded aircraft. There is some confusion in the literature between statute and nautical miles so all figures are approximate. Given the use of mapboard squares in the game vice hex tiles, representing a radius range is only very approximate so I would not "quibble over a square here or there in combat radius.

Combat Capability:

Hate to get into debating technical aspects of various aircraft. Tactics, training, and experience are the real descriminators with respect to combat success, not technical specifications. I have considerable experience flying fighters, attack aircraft, a couple of bomber types, and patrol aircraft so I am familiar with the somewhat misguided endless debate regarding aircraft performance and aircraft comparisons.

However,that said,iAirRange,iCombatLimit,iAirCombat,iInterceptionProbability,iEvasionProbability,iCollateralDamage,
iCollateralDamageLimit,iCollateralDamageMaxUnits,iBombRate,andiBombardRate all need to be filled in along with selected promotions [your hat tip to the RAF]. I would think many of these should be adjusted not only to reflect capability but also to reflect playability issues.

iCombatLimit: I assume that combat limit applies to the amount of damage a unit is able to inflict???

Your use of "large" ground units such as divisions, corps, and armies means that damage capabilities must be modified accordingly ... air to ground attacks, fighter or bomber, could attrite such units but should never be able to eliminate them. On the other hand, air to air combat should reflect the high likelyhood of destruction. Air to surface vs naval targets must also reflect the high likelyhood of ship destruction. Also surface to air attacks should reflect the ability to destroy the aircraft.

iAirCombat:

I have edited the table to reflect an overall subjective opinion of capabilities. I have no formulas to offer, just experience in the "trade".

iIntercept Probability:

Should reflect the capabilities of each countries' air defense network. British should start out well ahead of the rest with GE in second place. Initially, US, FR, IT, RUS, and CHI were pretty far behind. Given the rapid proliferation of radar, It is it is reasonable to assume that by the fig2 / bom2 stage, the major protagonists / antagonists were pulling up even with the British air direction system. Exception ... Since the US fleet in the Pacific was dealing with a very significant air threat, they too learned very rapidly and had a good radar based naval air direction / defense system by 1943. That would imply that US navy units should have a good air defense capability by then.

iEvasionProbability:

This should probably reflect the "ruggedness" of aircraft construction and also performance advantage. Some types could take hits and survive and some could not. Generally, all Japanese designs favored less armor and non self sealing fuel tanks to reduce weight and increase performance. All were very vulnerable and caught fire easily. us B 17 and eng Wellington bombers top the list of rugged aircraft. Piston driven fighters are fairly equal except in one respect, those with air cooled engines were more survivable than those with liquid cooled engines ... one hit in the "glycol" and liquid cooled engines were done. As long as there was some oil left, most damaged air cooled engines continued to run.

Air cooled fighter engines: it CR 42,ger FW 190, jap KI 27 and A6M, rus/chi I 16.

Other notes. In spite of liquid cooling, The Hurricane and P 40 were both noted for their ability to sustain damage and still get home.

Turbine powered jet aircraft are all vulnerable to hits in the engine/s. The F86 and Mystere had axial flow engines which were slightly more vulnerable to combat damage than their centrifugal flow counterparts. However, the speed/ performance advantage also transfers directly to increased evasion probability. Both the F 86 and Mystere IV were faster than their counterparts.

However, after all this, I expect most "numbers" will have to be adjusted for playability.

I give this quite a bit of thought. They are excellent ideas and having the input of a "Former Naval Pilot - FNP" makes it all the more so.

As to the Mosquito. I actually like it as I see it as the Allies, seeing the importance of the ground-attack role, so well demonstrated by the Germans, with the Stuka in the early part of the war and then the latter part, in it's main role in giving the Allies "significant" air support in causing disruption to the Germans.

I'll review your supplied spreadsheet in more detail over the next few weeks. I want to make 0.4 as good as possible.

As to ranges on the Europe Map. Each square is more like 100kms as opposed to your 36 miles.

FNP · Nov 11, 2009

Woops, so much for counting squares and using an atlas. need a scalar. Multiply Europe ranges by 0.58

If you want ground attack/ close air support aircraft instead of long range bombers, consider Typhoon, P-47, Mosquito, Il-2, A-20, and B-26. Or, give your 3rd generation fighters significant capability in the collateral damage, bomb, and bomb rate columns.

FNP · Nov 11, 2009

kiwitt said:
I may remove the "Blitz" promotion from ships. Giving ships massive movement distances, like proposed, would make them quite different to land units, but they would then also play quite a significant role.

Makes one appreciate why navies are important. Ships win the ton-mile/hour race every time. No ships, no Pacific war. No convoys, no British in the conflict after 1942, no US participation, no allied invasions, just a European land war.

Kleudde · Nov 17, 2009

wow it is nice to see that even up to this month some people tries to tweak and improve the best ever game/mod of the history!
I'm curious to give it a try. I've played so many games of Road to war and yes it's the best game ever but still have bugs and inconsistancy.
Is there a place where we can download the latest of your modifications? and a little "how to" to install it?

kiwitt · Nov 18, 2009

0.33 is the latest release and all the info can be found in my signature.

0.4x is due early next year.

kiwitt · Dec 16, 2009

Expect to re-start development soon.

kiwitt · Jan 2, 2010

0.39.xx is now under development.

My first focus is to correct any major errors from 0.3x. e.g. Tech Development costs.

kiwitt · Jan 19, 2010

A more indepth study into German forces will have me reduce the number of "armoured" units. This will also reduce the number on all others as well. As the maximums for German classes also apply for others, e.g. if German can had only 25 armoured divs, Russia can only have 25 as well, etc.

Supermarine2000 · Jan 20, 2010

kiwitt...the russians have 23.000 tanks in 1941, they have the largest armored forces in the entire world, but also the most of those units was T-26 tanks and many of them they used as artillery, because those tanks have a poor maintenance.

Road to War - Historical

Road to War Modder

Road to War Modder

Attachments

Road to War Modder

Road to War Modder

Road to War Modder

Road to War Modder

Chieftain

Road to War Modder

Imperial Guard

Road to War Modder

Road to War Modder

Road to War Modder

Chieftain

Chieftain

Chieftain

Road to War Modder

Road to War Modder

Road to War Modder

Road to War Modder

Warlord

Similar threads