PPQ_Purple
Purple Cube (retired)
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2008
- Messages
- 5,764
Honestly I don't really see a problem with just shooting them. I mean, it's quick, clean, relatively humane and cheap.
I would be amazed if it was cheap, considering it needs well trained individuals and a whole load of liability insurance.Honestly I don't really see a problem with just shooting them. I mean, it's quick, clean, relatively humane and cheap.
Over here in Europe we just let hunting associations or how ever that term translates hunt feral predators during the hunting season. At least that is my understanding of how it works. I am not a hunter. But I know it's a hunting thing and not a paid assassin sort of deal. And if it works for wolves and such why wouldn't it work for cats?I would be amazed if it was cheap, considering it needs well trained individuals and a whole load of liability insurance.
Well, I found one source and it does seem to say hunting is the cheaper option. I am, as I said, amazed.Over here in Europe we just let hunting associations or how ever that term translates hunt feral predators during the hunting season. At least that is my understanding of how it works. I am not a hunter. But I know it's a hunting thing and not a paid assassin sort of deal. And if it works for wolves and such why wouldn't it work for cats?
Basically, to my understanding, the way it works out over here is that you already have a whole bunch of people with guns that love stalking and killing animals. These are your hunters. But they can only do so at certain specific times of year and vs specific types of animals and only up to a specific and small number of kills all regulated by boring annoying laws meant to ruin their fun and also incidentally to stop them from killing off the population all in one glorious orgy of violence to be sung about for generations to come. So when you let them have another thing to shoot at and tell them it's open season all year and with no restrictions they jump at the chance to do it for free.Well, I found one source and it does seem to say hunting is the cheaper option. I am, as I said, amazed.
We get less and less hunters by the year, it seems. More and more aggressive permitting required. I remember being gobsmacked the season I read that people had to take a doe before they earned their tag for a buck. And deer is actually good eating. Harder hunting probably needs at least a bounty. Even if there are enough thrill killers to do it, they need to be able to afford to do it, and hunting takes time, gear, and travel.Basically, to my understanding, the way it works out over here is that you already have a whole bunch of people with guns that love stalking and killing animals. These are your hunters. But they can only do so at certain specific times of year and vs specific types of animals and only up to a specific and small number of kills all regulated by boring annoying laws meant to ruin their fun and also incidentally to stop them from killing off the population all in one glorious orgy of violence to be sung about for generations to come. So when you let them have another thing to shoot at and tell them it's open season all year and with no restrictions they jump at the chance to do it for free.
The above post contains hyperbole and slight comedy for the purposes of me wanting to be a bit tongue in cheek. Read accordingly.
From the OP it seems like the feral cat population was in wilderness areas? If they’re in at least semi-inhabited areas that makes it more dangerous for people to just go out shooting.
How is this for a solution: Making Australia’s native animals poisonous could curb feral cats
An implant that makes Australian animals lethally poisonous to cats that prey on them could help save species on the verge of extinction.Australian mammals are easily targeted by cats because many are small and they haven’t had time to evolve natural defences since the cats turned up. To provide an artificial defence strategy, Anton Blencowe and Kyle Brewer at the University of South Australia and their colleagues have invented an implant that makes native mammals lethal to cats if eaten, thereby preventing the felines from killing other individuals.The rice-sized implant is inert when it is inserted under the native mammal’s skin at the back of the neck. If a cat eats the mammal, it is likely to swallow the implant, because cats usually eat the whole bodies of their prey. Once the cat ingests the implant, the acid inside the cat’s stomach breaks it open and releases a fatal poison.The poison – sodium fluoroacetate, or “1080” – leads to unconsciousness then death in cats by causing an energy shutdown in their cells. It is already widely used in poison baits for feral cats because it is relatively non-toxic to native animals, so it shouldn’t harm other predators that may end up consuming the implant. This is because sodium fluoroacetate naturally occurs in many Australian plants and native animals have evolved resistance to it.
Paper Writeup (paywalled)
![]()
The main problem with shooting feral cats in Australia is there's, uh, several million feral cats spread across a country as big as the continental United States.Honestly I don't really see a problem with just shooting them. I mean, it's quick, clean, relatively humane and cheap.
Also we dont really have much of a hunting weirdo culture here. Kangaroo culls for instance are done by professional marksmen, not by random yahoos.Basically, to my understanding, the way it works out over here is that you already have a whole bunch of people with guns that love stalking and killing animals. These are your hunters. But they can only do so at certain specific times of year and vs specific types of animals and only up to a specific and small number of kills all regulated by boring annoying laws meant to ruin their fun and also incidentally to stop them from killing off the population all in one glorious orgy of violence to be sung about for generations to come. So when you let them have another thing to shoot at and tell them it's open season all year and with no restrictions they jump at the chance to do it for free.
The above post contains hyperbole and slight comedy for the purposes of me wanting to be a bit tongue in cheek. Read accordingly.
Well, I found one source and it does seem to say hunting is the cheaper option. I am, as I said, amazed.
![]()
From the OP it seems like the feral cat population was in wilderness areas? If they’re in at least semi-inhabited areas that makes it more dangerous for people to just go out shooting.
How has your country not gotten hunters to wipe these cats out? A few communities in my area had problems with deer population and they were able to get a crew of honest-to-goodness mercenary hunters to come in and snipe them. The deer problem was solved in a matter of days.
I keep forgetting just how large a territory we are talking about here. Over here in Europe I am used to thinking of things that are a hour driving away at highway speeds as very far away.