Small Observations General Thread (things not worth separate threads)

dive bomber.PNG

Dive Bomber
It's hard to tell at this zoom, but I think it's a SBD Dauntless
bridge.PNG

Confirmation that Bridges (era-specific ones, no less) are buildings, not improvements
 
View attachment 712558
I'm guessing the Expedition Base on this mountain tile (which you can work in the Modern Age) is something to do with Explorers and Artifacts
I was under the impression that that’s the “tile improvement” for tiles that aren’t normally built on. Could’ve sworn I saw a worked natural wonder that had that label on it at some point around the Exploration stream.
 
View attachment 712559
Dive Bomber
It's hard to tell at this zoom, but I think it's a SBD Dauntless
View attachment 712561
Confirmation that Bridges (era-specific ones, no less) are buildings, not improvements
Based on the unit "profile picture" I had thought that it might be a P-47, but I think you're right it's modeled after the Dauntless. And of course the fighter is the P-51.

View attachment 712556
We have some evidence that some unit appearances may be ideologically dependant. In the image above, two America's are fighting (both use the unique Marine unit in the top left). One uses a T-34 and the other a more fitting Sherman.

With confirmation of ideology returning and the gameplay of Ben Franklin (Democratic) using Shermans against Xerxes' (Communist) T-34s, I think it can be safely assumed that (at least tank) appearances are ideology dependant.
My guess is that either that screenshot is just using placeholder graphics, or else it's from an earlier build in which the Marine was a generic unit. It doesn't make sense otherwise.
 
Based on the unit "profile picture" I had thought that it might be a P-47, but I think you're right it's modeled after the Dauntless. And of course the fighter is the P-51.
The wing shape doesn't match the P-47's beautiful semi-elliptical wings, and it also has a stretched two or three place cockpit. If it's not the Dauntless, then perhaps a less iconic naval dive bomber like the Devestator or Vindicator.
 
The wing shape doesn't match the P-47's beautiful semi-elliptical wings, and it also has a stretched two or three place cockpit. If it's not the Dauntless, then perhaps a less iconic naval dive bomber like the Devestator or Vindicator.
I think it's most likely meant to be the Dauntless, based on the beefy nose and wing and the narrow triangular tail.
 
city park.PNG

Seems to be a City Park
The building in the lower right corner with the vaulted roof is a Stock Exchange
 
Last edited:
artillery.PNG

Here's a neat detail. This artillery piece is being towed by a WW1 era Holt (or similar brand) tractor as part of the Army Commander's stack.
 
View attachment 712574
Here's a neat detail. This artillery piece is being towed by a WW1 era Holt (or similar brand) tractor as part of the Army Commander's stack.
Yeah, the Field Cannon is being towed by horses, too. The unit artists have been doing some serious work.
 
Yep.

Ironworks
View attachment 712564

Factory
View attachment 712565

Cannery
View attachment 712566

Museum
View attachment 712567

Opera House
View attachment 712568

Laboratory
View attachment 712570

Tenement
View attachment 712571

Schoolhouse
View attachment 712572
I'm not sure what this is; by process of elimination it may be an Inn.
View attachment 712573
Last one is the Military Academy.

Re: Bridges
Every era has one in the tech tree, that's why it's "Ancient Bridge". Seems like they must be upgraded just like walls.
 
gun elephants.PNG

Here are those gun elephants. They are in the Siamese civ.
 
View attachment 712559
Dive Bomber
It's hard to tell at this zoom, but I think it's a SBD Dauntless
View attachment 712561
Confirmation that Bridges (era-specific ones, no less) are buildings, not improvements
O Thankyou. Now two bombers are divided into two groups. Tactical and Strategic.
This may have something to do with carriers. Tactical bomber (like Mitsubishi Ki-30 'Nagoya' which is conveniently Siamese and also Japanese variants) is light enough to ride Aircraft Carriers, while Strategic Bombers have longer operational rage but can't ride CVs.
My guess is wrong. at first I think this one should be bushplane that later evolves into choppers. and bushplanes require no airfields to work.
 
Mughal UU.PNG

This appears to be the Mughal UU. I saw the icon in a city at first and expected this to be a cavalry unit. But it's clearly not.
Sepoy.PNG

It's called a Sepoy
 
View attachment 712559
Dive Bomber
It's hard to tell at this zoom, but I think it's a SBD Dauntless
View attachment 712561
Confirmation that Bridges (era-specific ones, no less) are buildings, not improvements
I should think that Bridges would be a building in the same way a Wall is. Like something you could build that wouldn’t take up one of your two building slots. Seems unthinkable that it would kneecap your district in such a significant way for such a relatively minor benefit.
 
I should think that Bridges would be a building in the same way a Wall is. Like something you could build that wouldn’t take up one of your two building slots. Seems unthinkable that it would kneecap your district in such a significant way for such a relatively minor benefit.
It's kind of weird. If you want to expand on the other side of a river, you could easily build a Fishing Quay or a Bath to hit the other side. So, the Bridge mostly just seems like flavor. And it's not like you're obliged to place another building in the district with it. Just leave the other slot empty. A warehouse building could complete it though without interfering with any kind of Adjacency Bonus stacking.
 
razing.PNG

The penalty for razing is hardcore. Any opponent in any future war will have 1 free war support for every city you razed.
 
Here is the rollover with the unit name: "Chang Beun".

View attachment 712580
There's good reason why Siamese use Field Cannons that way. There ain't enough flatlands here until Isaan region is annexed. And before 80s-90s, highways to support wheeled vehicles of any kind did not really exists, or not really good.
My guess that it will be Ranged class. and with better sight range by 1 (Better view from atop of a howdah).
Quite an acceptable name though. I'd even expect something like 'Ratchawanlop' which it is a Royal Guard. and I even saw a photograph of Two Guard Units with a field cannon mounted on the same 'foreign' carriage. one of the two was 'Catholic Vietnamese Legion Guard'. (one of the two Foreign guardsmen, the other was similiar Viet volunteers but a Buddhist unit. Both of which were Guards Artillery. Both of which recruited from refugees (Since the Siamese Kingdom's threat was two whitemen empires-British Empire and French Empire, and enemies of previous generation has to unite as 'Free People'). Yet. bad road prevents the use of field carriage on the actual fiend until much later. Instead Siamese specifications of field artillery were all of Mountain types. which can be mounted on elehant and shoot from there, or at least elephants being just a pack animal.

^ Krupp 5cm breech loader mountain gun. no recoil mechanism. It was made to be usable from howdah mount.
Also Siam bought 7.5 cm Krupp mountain gun (M1903 Mountain variants) . it has recoil mechanism. one of these later became Royal Funeral Caisson. and I've saw ones myself several years ago.

 
Back
Top Bottom