Stuff you wish they taught in school

Why do you keep playing the "teachers are dumb, they have easy, well-paying jobs" card? It's not true. At all.

EDIT: And that was a pretty blatantly sexist thing to say.

maybe it appears that way, but I can't help that. Much of it is society that doesn't push women to believe they can be engineers or doctors. But that is getting off topic for this thread, so I won't go into it more here.
 
maybe it appears that way, but I can't help that. Much of it is society that doesn't push women to believe they can be engineers or doctors. But that is getting off topic for this thread, so I won't go into it more here.

Nah, I'd rather you'd elaborate on how come you appear to be incredibly sexist and ignorant.
 
Maybe in the 50s. Women are encouraged to do all kinds of things now. More so than men probably.
 
The fact that other than my math and science teachers in school, most were not very smart. I also had two math teachers that weren't very smart. And I won't even go into my elementary school teachers...

Your personal school experiences are not representative of the profession. Teachers are on the whole a pretty smart bunch of people, they need to be to keep on top of all the elements of the job. It is also worth noting that it is easy to confuse subject knowledge with intelligence... I know many teachers who teach in a subject that is not something they studied previously; to a school child they may appear to be dim but in reality they are simply out of their comfort zone.

The thing is teacher intelligence isn't that important. They should be more closer to the kids in intelligence (and many aren't much smarter than kids, and many less so). Think about it. Would you want someone like Eintein teaching your kids? He would be a horrible teacher. You don't want someone so smart, they go over the kid's heads.

Subject knowledge is certainly not the be all and end all of being a good teacher. There are many good teachers who know only slightly more about their subject than they teach at school, while their are others who could teach their subject at university level.

What's important is that a teacher knows how to teach; that's the skill that makes a good teacher. As much as I have a vested interest in seeing pay rises for the profession I'm not sure that they would do anything to ensure more good teachers in schools.
 
That there is nothing wrong with not being straight, or not cis-gendered (Transgendered).
 
A lot of people underestimate how difficult teaching can be. You need the skills to keep a class of 30 or more children or teenagers under control. You have to keep track of all those people for every one one of your classes, how are they doing in your class, what are their problem areas, how is their behaviour in class, etc. One of the most difficult things is that you need to be motivated and try to get the students to be motivated. If your students don't do well it reflects poorly on you as a teacher. Between lesson planning, student evaluation, record keeping and actual teaching it's a very demanding job. And there's meetings, workshops, things like that.


Yeah, public school teaching has been by FAR, the hardest thing I've ever done. It doesn't necessarily require an exceptional academic pedigree, but you cannot do it well if you are dumb, and most people do not do it well at all.

A big reason teachers face a pay and prestige gap in my country is because the profession is dominated by women.
 
How to shoot. That would be fun.
 
I used to tutor a science lab at an inner city middle school. Let me tell you, the teachers there were doing the best they could with what they had been provided. Sadly, they had not been provided with much.

It depends on how you view education. I may get flamed for this, but I'll go out right now and say most teachers are not very smart. Their degrees aren't nearly as valuable as an engineering or computer science degree. They really are just a step up from liberal arts. Most women want to be a teacher because it is an easy job that pays good, and doesn't require much intelligence. I think their pay is just about right. ...

Yeah, I'm going to stop reading about there.

You really don't have any experience in this field, do you? Or do you just take your talking points from Fox News? They seem to be flagrantly anti-education these days.

firemen in my city make over $100,000 a year. Policeman not as much. Which is strange, because I would think it would be the other way around. Firemen really have a very easy job. Very rarely do they actually get called to fight fires in my city. Of course when they do get called, then their job becomes the most important in the world. Almost nothing catches fire in my city. Mostly just small house fires, and mobile homes which are destroyed by the time they get there.

:confused: :lol:

Firefighting and police work are both jobs with mind-numbing mundane boredom punctuated with a few moments of sheer terror. If you think putting out "small house fires" is chump's work, think again. There are several types of fires sorted based on fuel source, they have to identify what type it is to make sure the extinguisher they use is appropriate, etc. They also serve as safety inspectors while responding to calls (i.e. when they go into a lab, they have to check to see if there are any other hazards present).

And hanging out in a rat-infested crummy firehouse isn't exactly living at the Ritz. It's not a cushy job.
 
Your personal school experiences are not representative of the profession. Teachers are on the whole a pretty smart bunch of people, they need to be to keep on top of all the elements of the job. It is also worth noting that it is easy to confuse subject knowledge with intelligence... I know many teachers who teach in a subject that is not something they studied previously; to a school child they may appear to be dim but in reality they are simply out of their comfort zone.

I've certainly known some very poor teachers, though. Who would appear to be doing the job because they like being in charge, or in the case of my former boss (he owned a tutoring business), he had a science degree, couldn't get a job, so did a dip-ed and had no trouble getting a job, because science & maths teachers are in short supply. He was a very, very poor teacher. Nice bloke though.

Subject knowledge is certainly not the be all and end all of being a good teacher. There are many good teachers who know only slightly more about their subject than they teach at school, while their are others who could teach their subject at university level.

Or in some cases, they don't even know the subject. I had a housemate struggling with the last year of his engineering degree. I tutored him, and he passed. I did this despite not actually knowing the subject, and just teaching myself enough out of the textbook to help him. :lol:

But yeah, teaching is a skill. Some people who are very good at maths (or whatever else) are also very good at teaching. Some people who are very good at maths make very poor teachers, for reasons like struggling to break down & communicate the concepts.

I think teachers are underpaid, I also don't know if better pay would actually result in better teachers. I think the really good teachers love seeing people learn stuff, they're probably going to do it regardless. Better pay might help draw more of the mediocre teachers who see teaching as an easy job. I met enough of them through school, I don't think we need more. Better pay might also draw the intelligent people who might enjoy & be good at teaching, but who don't do it because there's more money & more interest elsewhere.

Hard to measure how good a teacher is, too.
 
To add to the ever-growing list... this has probably been listed already, but:
Basic critical thinking skills
We live in the Age of Information. We're bombarded by political statements, fad diets, alternative medicine, conspiracy theories and so on at every turn. Our kids need to grow up with the skills to separate the chaff from the wheat.

How many times haven't you heard someone say something like, homoeopathy works -- I tried it and got better afterwards.
I know this sounds condescending, but the fact that anecdotes are not evidence is one of the most elemental rules of critical thinking. It's like living in a big city and not knowing that a red light means stop and a green light means go.

Or the other ways people tend to extrapolate single incidents: no, I won't get vaccinated, because I heard a girl died from the vaccine.
Er, 30 000 people are killed by seat belts every year, do you want those banned, too?

Or, this one summer, in this one area, has been colder than average. Therefore, global warming is a myth.

We need critical thinking classes in our schools.
 
On that question, one thing I wish they taught people in schools is when it is best to keep ones mouth shut. Im sure that could help the vast majority of people (including myself IRL, I tend to rant too much :p).
Word. I get myself in quite a bit of trouble by saying what I shouldn't. I've gotten better at this though.
 
To add to the ever-growing list... this has probably been listed already, but:
Basic critical thinking skills
We live in the Age of Information. We're bombarded by political statements, fad diets, alternative medicine, conspiracy theories and so on at every turn. Our kids need to grow up with the skills to separate the chaff from the wheat.

How many times haven't you heard someone say something like, homoeopathy works -- I tried it and got better afterwards.
I know this sounds condescending, but the fact that anecdotes are not evidence is one of the most elemental rules of critical thinking. It's like living in a big city and not knowing that a red light means stop and a green light means go.

Or the other ways people tend to extrapolate single incidents: no, I won't get vaccinated, because I heard a girl died from the vaccine.
Er, 30 000 people are killed by seat belts every year, do you want those banned, too?

Or, this one summer, in this one area, has been colder than average. Therefore, global warming is a myth.

We need critical thinking classes in our schools.

Yup, amen here. Part of this goes along with distinguishing between anecdotes and facts, hypotheses and theories that I talked about earlier. I'm wondering if a basic research and critical thinking class is necessary in high school, or if it should be dispersed into other classes along the way. Part of me thinks that if it is dispersed, we'll end up where we are right now.
 
Back
Top Bottom