Superheroes!

New Alan Moore interview...

Alan Moore Gives Rare Interview: ‘Watchmen’ Creator Talks New Project ‘The Show’,
How Superhero Movies Have “Blighted Culture” & Why He Wants Nothing To Do With Comics



EXCLUSIVE: As the creator of Watchmen, V For Vendetta and many more celebrated comic series, Alan Moore is one of the industry’s biggest names, but his frosty relationship with the film adaptations of his works has been well documented. After some very public dissatisfaction with previous endeavours (see The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen), he now refuses to let his name be linked with any such projects, even declining to profit from the big-screen incarnations, a decision that he estimates has cost him millions.

Now, Moore is attempting to break into the film business on his own terms with original project The Show. Starring Tom Burke and directed by Mitch Jenkins, the fantastical adventure, set in Moore’s hometown of Northampton, follows a man’s search for a stolen artefact, a journey that leads him into a surreal world of crime and mystery.


I also took the chance to ask him about retiring from comics in 2018, which his followers will be disappointed to hear he seems firmly set on, as well as his take on the current world of blockbuster superhero films, which he has been an inadvertent factor in. Safe to say, he is not a fan. He’s also not a fan of the current UK or U.S. political regimes, particularly Donald Trump, or “National Socialist satsuma”, as Moore refers to him.

The Show would have premiered at SXSW earlier this year, but following the Austin event’s cancellation it is headed to Spanish genre festival Sitges where it will debut online October 8 before a physical screening on October 12. Protagonist Pictures is handling world sales.

DEADLINE: Hi Alan, what’s your lockdown experience in Northampton been like?

ALAN MOORE: Me and my wife Melinda are still effectively living in late February – it’s about the same temperature. We are ignoring all advice from the government because we don’t think they have our best interests at heart, we’re just doing what we think is the most sensible thing, we’re maintaining distancing, having our stuff delivered. We haven’t seen or touched anybody in the last six months.

On the other hand, we’re finding that we’re closer to people even though we haven’t seen them in the flesh for ages. We’re spending a lot more time calling up and reading stories to our grandchildren, which is a lot of fun. Things that we didn’t find the time for back when the world was trundling ahead. Yes we miss everybody, but at the same time I can see different sorts of bonds forming. We will keep informed by listening to proper doctor and scientists.

DEADLINE: You retired from comics after finishing The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen in 2018, any thoughts on getting back in the saddle?

MOORE: I’m not so interested in comics anymore, I don’t want anything to do with them.

I had been doing comics for 40-something years when I finally retired. When I entered the comics industry, the big attraction was that this was a medium that was vulgar, it had been created to entertain working class people, particularly children. The way that the industry has changed, it’s ‘graphic novels’ now, it’s entirely priced for an audience of middle class people. I have nothing against middle class people but it wasn’t meant to be a medium for middle aged hobbyists. It was meant to be a medium for people who haven’t got much money.

Most people equate comics with superhero movies now. That adds another layer of difficulty for me. I haven’t seen a superhero movie since the first Tim Burton Batman film. They have blighted cinema, and also blighted culture to a degree. Several years ago I said I thought it was a really worrying sign, that hundreds of thousands of adults were queuing up to see characters that were created 50 years ago to entertain 12-year-old boys. That seemed to speak to some kind of longing to escape from the complexities of the modern world, and go back to a nostalgic, remembered childhood. That seemed dangerous, it was infantilizing the population.

This may be entirely coincidence but in 2016 when the American people elected a National Socialist satsuma and the UK voted to leave the European Union, six of the top 12 highest grossing films were superhero movies. Not to say that one causes the other but I think they’re both symptoms of the same thing – a denial of reality and an urge for simplistic and sensational solutions.

DEADLINE: You said you feel responsible for how comics have changed, why?

MOORE: It was largely my work that attracted an adult audience, it was the way that was commercialized by the comics industry, there were tons of headlines saying that comics had ‘grown up’. But other than a couple of particular individual comics they really hadn’t.

This thing happened with graphic novels in the 1980s. People wanted to carry on reading comics as they always had, and they could now do it in public and still feel sophisticated because they weren’t reading a children’s comic, it wasn’t seen as subnormal. You didn’t get the huge advances in adult comic books that I was thinking we might have. As witnessed by the endless superhero films…

DEADLINE: What’s your take on the comics industry now?

MOORE: I doubt the major companies will be coming out of lockdown in any shape at all. The mainstream comics industry is about 80 years old and it has lots of pre-existing health conditions. It wasn’t looking that great before COVID happened.

Most of our entertainment industries have been a bit top heavy for a while. The huge corporations, business interests, have so much money they can produce these gigantic blockbusters of one sort or another that will dominate their markets. I can see that changing, and perhaps for the better. It’s too early to make optimistic predictions but you might hope that the bigger interests will find it more difficult to manoeuvre in this new landscape, whereas the smaller independent concerns might find that they are a bit more adapted. These times might be an opportunity for genuinely radical and new voices to come to the fore in the absence of yesteryear.

DEADLINE: The economic realties, and lack of support for the arts, could hamper that.

MOORE: That is undeniable. I am talking in the long-term. There is going to be an awful lot of economic pain for everybody before this is over. I’m not even sure it ever will technically be over, until we’ve reached a better stage of equilibrium, whatever that turns out to be. When that was attained I hope we might see a very different landscape culturally.

DEADLINE: Do you watch no superhero movies at all? What about something a bit offbeat, like Joker? You wrote a key Batman comic book…

MOORE: Oh christ no I don’t watch any of them. All of these characters have been stolen from their original creators, all of them. They have a long line of ghosts standing behind them. In the case of Marvel films, Jack Kirby [the Marvel artist and writer]. I have no interest in superheroes, they were a thing that was invented in the late 1930s for children, and they are perfectly good as children’s entertainment. But if you try to make them for the adult world then I think it becomes kind of grotesque.

I’ve been told the Joker film wouldn’t exist without my Joker story (1988’s Batman: The Killing Joke), but three months after I’d written that I was disowning it, it was far too violent – it was Batman for christ’s sake, it’s a guy dressed as a bat. Increasingly I think the best version of Batman was Adam West, which didn’t take it at all seriously. We have a kind of superhero character in The Show but if we get the chance to develop them more then people will be able to see all of the characters have quite unusual aspects to them.

DEADLINE: Hasn’t cinema always been a form of escapism, to an extent?

MOORE: Sometimes it was, all art-forms are potentially. But they can be used for something other than escapism. Think of all the films that have really challenged assumptions, films that have been difficult to take on board, disturbing in their messages. The same goes for literature. But these superhero films are too often escapism.

With regards to The Show, I think it’s an interesting case in point. I am known, perhaps a bit unfairly, for creating dystopias – I think I’ve done one or two but the rest are just my reflections on the world as I see it. With The Show, it could very well be argued that it is actually set in a dystopia, in that Northampton is the first British town in something like 35 years to collapse into an economic blackhole. We went into special measures in the early months of 2018. We can only afford skeleton services. They’re now talking about breaking it up into two different voting areas, which I imagine will make it Conservative until the end of time. There are a lot of failed social visions, mismanagement, but the imaginary life of the town… it has odd little pockets of surrealism and bizarreness that are still there, same as they’ve ever been, that are coming to the fore as Northampton’s waking reality has been so disjointed. The Show is an observed fantasy on a number of levels, but an awful lot of it is true. The town really is that odd-looking.

DEADLINE: In retirement, are you still creating, do you still write?

MOORE: I’ve only retired from comics. I’m finishing off a book of magic now. It’s been stalled for a while but I’m also working on an opera about John Dee with [musician] Howard Gray. I’ve got some short stories coming out. And I’ve also been thinking a lot about what we want to do after The Show feature film. We hope that it’s enjoyable as a thing in itself, but to some degree it could be seen as an incredibly elaborate pilot episode, we think there’s quite an interesting story that we could develop out of it as a TV series, which would imaginatively be called The Show.

I’ve worked out about four-five seasons of potential episodes. We’re showing that around to people to see how it goes, if there should be any interest I am prepared to launch myself into that. We’re not asking for a huge amount of money we’re just asking for control over the work and ownership over the work, if that is something people are prepared to give us we have no problem with people making money out of it. What we have got a problem with is us losing our rights to the ownership of the material, and having the work interfered with in any way.

DEADLINE: It sounds like the kind of thing Netflix might be interested in, but retaining your IP might be an issue…

MOORE: We shall see. There are options. All we need is to own our IP. But that’s why it has taken us so long to get to the feature film stage, and to get the five short films made previously. I really don’t have an interest in writing for movies or television per se, it has to be on my terms, which I think are fair ones. I’ve got no problem with other people making money from those works.

DEADLINE: Fair to say you’ve earned that right.

MOORE: I think so.

DEADLINE: Why make the shorts first?

MOORE: When we were trying to get this made some people wanted us to make a short film that would later be made into a feature film. As soon as it was announced that I was doing any sort of film there was suddenly a lot of interest in it. People said it could be a short that turned into a feature and a TV series, like This Is England. I realised without changing it I could open up the story, it could become a much bigger narrative.

DEADLINE: And you used the shorts to attract the feature finance?

MOORE: The BFI nobly gave us just over £1m if we could get someone to match that. It went on for a few years with various partners getting involved but not being able to work out the financial details. I was coming to the end of my rope and then we heard the financing was in place and we had something like £3m and could go ahead and make the film in November 2018.

We started on schedule, but I noticed there seemed to be a lot of the investors gathering around Mitch [Jenkins, director] in the early days of the film. When we finally got it finished we had a modest wrap party at a local restaurant, I thought it was a good-looking film for £3m, and then Mitch said, ‘we didn’t do that for £3m’… apparently just before the film was due to start soothing, some of the investors pulled out, they said it would take another year or two to raise the money again but someone said if I heard this had happened they would probably never see me again. They gave Mitch a chance to make it for £1m but were breathing down his neck to make sure he met all the deadlines. I believe we got it shot for £900,000, I don’t think it looks like a £900,000 movie…

DEADLINE: It certainly doesn’t. Did you have to make compromises?

MOORE: There was one scene that was removed because there wasn’t time for it. There might have been small changes but not really significantly. The main good fortune was that we had Northampton at our disposal, perhaps the only good thing about having the town on its knees is that the council are absolutely desperate for anything that will draw any kind of financial attention to this collapsed hellhole. They gave us the freedom of the town.

DEADLINE: What are your hopes for the film?

MOORE: I hope people will enjoy it and will be interested enough to see how the story will evolve in a TV series. I hope that all the people who worked on the film, including the brilliant actors, get the recognition. But all of that is in the lap of the gods.

DEADLINE: I’m a huge fan of Tom Burke…

MOORE: Absolutely, he’s terrific, he brought such a lot to the character and he’s a terrific guy as well. I particularly enjoyed my scene with Tom.

DEADLINE: How long did it take you to get into that makeup? [See below]

MOORE: Oh, hours. Our makeup designer was an absolute genius, she did it as quickly as anybody could.
 
I watched the second ep of Swamp Thing over the weekend. Not bad. I plan to keep watching. Bits n' bobs...
  1. The costuming for Swampy himself is darned good. It must take forever to get all that crap on and off.
  2. You can tell they've had to edit the show a little bit for broadcast on the kid-friendly The CW. Swear-words are removed, but thankfully not replaced with something else. Something I hadn't seen before: When the person swears, their mouth is briefly blurred out onscreen. There was also a scene where it looked like a moment of gory violence had been removed, but I only noticed the one.
  3. I knew Crystal Reed looked familiar, but I had to look her up to figure out where I'd seen her before: She was in Too Late with John Hawkes.
  4. Blue Devil. Ha. I used to read that comic.
  5. On one of his podcasts, Kevin Smith said one of the nails in the show's coffin was the cost of storing the sets, which he thought might run in the millions. Evidently, a lot of the show is filmed on an elaborate soundstage. So now I'm staring intently at the backgrounds, looking for the seams. It's all pretty convincing, I gotta say.
  6. Smith also suggested that the character could be folded into The CW's shows somehow, as John Constantine was brought into Legends after his show was canceled. I don't think I'd want to see Swamp Thing brought aboard any of the existing series, but a live-action adaptation of Justice League Dark has been talked about for years now. JLD is like DC's version of The Defenders - the comic, not the netflix series - supernatural-themed heroes teaming up to battle magical bad guys: Swamp Thing, John Constantine, Deadman, Zatanna, Black Orchid, The Phantom Stranger, et al. I think Guillermo Del Toro wanted to do a film version, for a while.
 
Collider, 26 Oct 2020 - "Oscar Isaac in Talks to Join the MCU as Moon Knight for Disney+ Series"

Collider said:
Marvel is continuing to cast up its forthcoming Disney+ shows, and now it appears they’ve found their lead for Jeremy Slater’s Moon Knight series. TheWrap reports that Oscar Isaac is in talks to play Marc Spector, “the Jewish son of a rabbi who fled to the United States from Czechoslovakia during World War II. Spector grew up in Chicago and joined the Marines, then became a CIA operative, and then a mercenary after that.” He becomes Moon Knight when, after a near-death experience in an Egyptian tomb, his spirit met Khnoshu, who healed his injuries and gave him the power of the moon, which allows him to survive moral wounds and provides super strength at night. Spector also has dissociative identity disorder, so there’s the question of whether Khonshu is even real. That’s a lot!
I would never have predicted or fancast Isaac for this role, but I'm totally on board. Moon Knight would have been a natural fit with the Netflix Defenders series of shows, if they'd gone forward with those. As you can see from the description here, Moon Knight may or may not be mentally-ill, some of the villains he fought were pretty brutal, and the style of nasty, no-holds-barred fight scene we got in Daredevil and The Punisher would be a great fit. I hope Disney has the backbone to let some of their MCU material go to the dark side of the street, as they did with their Netflix and Hulu shows.
 
What do you mean by soft reboot exactly? The previous movies don't matter, the same way that the previous Spiderman movies don't matter? Or is it only parts of the movie that's no longer canon?
The 3rd movie is a 180-degree tonal change, and the story has nothing much to do with what came before. iirc, Taika Waititi admitted he knew nothing about any of this superhero stuff before making this movie. I think somebody gave him a copy of a Thor comic, and he looked at the pictures and pretended to read it.

See, I am sort of watching these movies for the action... but most superhero movies never appealed to me. One exception - I liked The Dark Knight quite a bit, but usually dislike Batman movies. Dark Knight was just well done as a movie, I thought, but the rest of them just bore me. They're too goofy and I can't take them seriously. So it might seem odd I liked those two comedies in particular, but the writing just spoke to me. As did the characters. And that's what I usually look for in a story - a well written and put together plot, good dialogue, and well fleshed out characters. Doesn't matter if it's a sci-fi novel I'm reading, a soft sci-fi superhero comedy, a serious movie about wolves mating, or what have you. I am looking for artfully told stories, essentially - everything else is secondary to that objective.
My favorite live-action adaptation of a Marvel Comics property - Daredevil on Netflix from 2015 - is the closest thing there is to a follow-up to The Dark Knight, imo. It's three, 13-episode seasons. Being so long, it really dives into the characters, including the villains, more than any of the other Marvel adaptations. There are entire episodes dedicated to character development, and the main character doesn't even adopt his full "superhero" persona until the last episode of the first season. The acting is top-shelf, the direction and camera work are cinematic. The violence is almost jarring, but the fight scenes and stuntwork are legendary, up there among the best ever filmed, imo.

I had one question. That time crystal thing that the plot revolves around.. They don't really explain where it came from, it was just there and then it got stolen. I might have missed some dialogue that explains it, I'm not sure. I also don't want to google it and read spoilers from the other movies. Is there one movie in particular that deals with where this time crystal came from?
If you're talking about the Tesseract, it was introduced in Captain America: The First Avenger, but I don't think we learn what it actually is until Avengers: Infinity War. For the time being, it's just a MacGuffin: The Bad Guys all want it, and Bad Things happen if they get their hands on it. There's a post-credits stinger at the end of Avengers that features a character only fans of the comics would have recognized at that point, and I think he doesn't make another appearance until 3 movies later, so don't sweat it if you didn't know who he was.

Doctor Strange
It's been a while since I've seen The Avengers, but I think he might be talking about The Tesseract, which was either the Space Stone or the Power Stone, not the Time Stone that Strange keeps in the Eye of Agamotto.
 
Yeah, I believe it is the tesseract. It's the thing they had on that flying aircraft carrier, which they were going to be using to build some weapons, or something. Then it got stolen by the Scandinavian baddies and used to open a portal to Detroit (or somewhere)
 
I am sort of watching these movies for the action... but most superhero movies never appealed to me. One exception - I liked The Dark Knight quite a bit, but usually dislike Batman movies. Dark Knight was just well done as a movie, I thought, but the rest of them just bore me. They're too goofy and I can't take them seriously. So it might seem odd I liked those two comedies in particular, but the writing just spoke to me. As did the characters. And that's what I usually look for in a story - a well written and put together plot, good dialogue, and well fleshed out characters. Doesn't matter if it's a sci-fi novel I'm reading, a soft sci-fi superhero comedy, a serious movie about wolves mating, or what have you. I am looking for artfully told stories, essentially - everything else is secondary to that objective.

Of the MCU movies Iron Man 1, Thor Ragnarok, Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Black Panther, and both of the Spiderman movies are generally considered to be the better stand alone movies.

Okay cool, thanks for the insights! For now I'm going to watch the 4 tie-in movies and go from there..

You can do what you want of course, but before you get to Infinity War and Endgame I highly recommend watching Thor Ragnarok and Captain America: Civil War. The events in both of those movies lead directly into Infinity War which just kind of assumes you are up to speed on everything and doesn't do a lot of explaining.

I had one question. That time crystal thing that the plot revolves around.. They don't really explain where it came from, it was just there and then it got stolen. I might have missed some dialogue that explains it, I'm not sure. I also don't want to google it and read spoilers from the other movies. Is there one movie in particular that deals with where this time crystal came from?

It's been a while since I've seen The Avengers, but I think he might be talking about The Tesseract, which was either the Space Stone or the Power Stone, not the Time Stone that Strange keeps in the Eye of Agamotto.

The Tesseract (the glowy blue cube) is the container for the Space Stone. Captain America: The First Avenger deals directly with the Tesseract and the first Guardian of the Galaxy movie goes into what the stones are. But if you want to save roughly 4 hours

Spoiler :
The Tesseract gets dug up by Nazis in the 1940s. Presumably it was given or lost, it's not really clear, by the Asgardians (Thor's people) when they first had contact with the Vikings way back when. Some Nazi guy wants to use it to build super weapons. Captain America stops him but in the process crashes a plane into the Arctic Ocean that has himself and the Tesseract on board. Captain America doesn't die but gets frozen. Then in 2012 just before the start of The Avengers, Captain America gets unfrozen along with the Tesseract.

The Tesseract contains the Space Stone which is one of the six Infinity Stones. The Infinity Stones are these immensely powerful stones that can grant those who wield them special powers.
  • The Space Stone allows the user to teleport anywhere in the Universe.
  • The Mind Stone allows the user to mind control other people.
  • The Power Stone gives the user great destructive power. Like blowing up a planet kinda of power.
  • The Time Stone allows the user to alter the flow of time either for themselves or for other people/objects.
  • The Reality Stone allows the user to change the fabric of reality, which is basically breaking down and rebuilding matter.
  • The Soul Stone, well I don't think it was ever explained what it does but it seems to be able to house the souls of people who get sacrificed to it. Seems like a crappy power in my opinion
 
Thanks! I didn't read the spoilers. I might just go back and watch some of the older movies first, before I even get into the second avengers movie. I'll have to think about this.

edit: you know what? screw it, i might just go back and start at the beginning. It's going to be a long winter after all..

Is this a good watch order? i.e. the order in which these movies were actually released:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Marvel_Cinematic_Universe_films#Films
 
Is this a good watch order? i.e. the order in which these movies were actually released:

Yup. All the movies were released in chronological order except for the first Captain America and Captain Marvel which were set in the 1940s and 1990s respectively.
 
It's been a while since I've seen The Avengers, but I think he might be talking about The Tesseract, which was either the Space Stone or the Power Stone, not the Time Stone that Strange keeps in the Eye of Agamotto.
Yes, you're right. I misunderstood @warpus' post, thought he'd already seen Infinity War as well (since he mentioned Captain Marvel)

Also, might be worth asking a mod to get all the rest of the posts for this convo moved from the 'Questions' thread across to here...
 
The Incredible Hulk is nowhere to be found on Disney+, and according to my research it's some studio drama or other.

Can I ignore this movie and pretend that it isn't a part of the story/universe? If not, where can I watch it (for free, in Canada)?

edit: I started watching Captain Marvel, why not. I know it's a recent movie but it seems to take place before the first Avengers movie, so I'm checking this out before I move on to Thor and Iron Man 2. And maybe The incredible hulk if there's a way to watch it.

Why is the planet that Captain Marvel is from full of humans? Or aliens that look like humans? I think it said it was the Kree homeworld, but it also seems like the Kree might be the bad guys. I should have been paying more attention (and I also don't want to google any of this cause spoilesr)
 
Last edited:
Can I ignore this movie and pretend that it isn't a part of the story/universe?
Yes, pretty much.

IIRC, the (disavowed) Ang Lee/ Eric Bana Hulk-movie and the Edward Norton Hulk-movie have a kinda sorta continuity with each other (the former ends with Banner fleeing to somewhere in [Mexico? Central America? Brazil?], the latter begins with him (still?) hiding out down there), but even though the Norton movie is (AFAIK) 'officially' part of the MCU, it has barely anything to do with the rest of those movies.

And personally, I like Ruffalo in the role better anyway.
 
Last edited:
The Incredible Hulk is nowhere to be found on Disney+, and according to my research it's some studio drama or other.

Can I ignore this movie and pretend that it isn't a part of the story/universe? If not, where can I watch it (for free, in Canada)?

edit: I started watching Captain Marvel, why not. I know it's a recent movie but it seems to take place before the first Avengers movie, so I'm checking this out before I move on to Thor and Iron Man 2. And maybe The incredible hulk if there's a way to watch it.

Why is the planet that Captain Marvel is from full of humans? Or aliens that look like humans? I think it said it was the Kree homeworld, but it also seems like the Kree might be the bad guys. I should have been paying more attention (and I also don't want to google any of this cause spoilesr)


They made 2 Hulk movies before any of the MCU stuff started. Neither was much of a success. So they can be forgotten about, as they really aren't part of the MCU. But are just mentioned because Hulk needed a backstory.
 
Every source I check says that the latest Hulk movie is a part of the MCU, but Disney doesn't own the rights to it. But mind you I am only going by the wikipedia movie list and some other place I forget. I quite liked the Hulk they had in the Avengers movie, whoever that actor is reminds me of the guy from the comic books (even though I never really read comics, for some reason I can picture the human Hulk dude)

I seem to remember watching the 2 pre-MCU hulk movies. I think... They made one, then they made an unrelated one, and then then made the MCU one. Do I have this right or completely wrong?

edit: okay I got that wrong, apparently there are only 2 movies. I saw both of them a while ago. The 2nd one, The Incredible Hulk, is supposed to be a part of the MCU, as per the wikipedia article on it and some other watching list I looked up.

I really liked the Captain Marvel movie, I just finished watching it. It was a lot better than the first Captain America movie. Thanks for not answering my questions, because that was a part of the twist, which I wasn't really expecting. Still not 100% clear on the aliens and the geo-political situation in the universe, but this was a good movie. I think next I am going to watch the first Thor movie.
 
Every source I check says that the latest Hulk movie is a part of the MCU, but Disney doesn't own the rights to it. But mind you I am only going by the wikipedia movie list and some other place I forget. I quite liked the Hulk they had in the Avengers movie, whoever that actor is reminds me of the guy from the comic books (even though I never really read comics, for some reason I can picture the human Hulk dude)

I seem to remember watching the 2 pre-MCU hulk movies. I think... They made one, then they made an unrelated one, and then then made the MCU one. Do I have this right or completely wrong?

edit: okay I got that wrong, apparently there are only 2 movies. I saw both of them a while ago. The 2nd one, The Incredible Hulk, is supposed to be a part of the MCU, as per the wikipedia article on it and some other watching list I looked up.

I really liked the Captain Marvel movie, I just finished watching it. It was a lot better than the first Captain America movie. Thanks for not answering my questions, because that was a part of the twist, which I wasn't really expecting. Still not 100% clear on the aliens and the geo-political situation in the universe, but this was a good movie. I think next I am going to watch the first Thor movie.



Do you know the term "retconned"?


Retroactive continuity, or retcon for short,[1][2] is a literary device in which established diegetic 'facts' in the plot of a fictional work are adjusted, ignored, or contradicted by a subsequently published work which breaks continuity with the former.[3]

There are various motivations for applying retroactive continuity, including:

  • To accommodate desired aspects of sequels or derivative works which would otherwise be ruled out.
  • In response to negative fan reception of previous stories.
  • To correct and overcome errors or problems identified in the prior work since its publication.
  • To change how the prior work should be interpreted.
  • To match reality, when assumptions or projections of the future are later proven wrong.[Note 1]
Retcons are used by authors to increase their creative freedom, on the assumption that the changes are unimportant to the audience compared to the new story which can be told. For instance, by retroactively setting a prior story in a parallel universe, departed popular characters can be reintroduced. More subtly, a minor plot point might be retroactively expunged (for instance, the heroine leaving home without any food), removing an obstacle to further storytelling (that she should be getting hungry).

Retcons are common in pulp fiction, and especially in comic books published by long-established publishers such as DC and Marvel.[5] The long history of popular titles and the number of writers who contribute stories can often create situations that demand clarification or revision. Retcons also often appear in manga, soap operas, serial dramas, movie sequels, cartoons, professional wrestling angles, video games, radio series, and other forms of serial fiction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retroactive_continuity


This pretty much explains how the Hulk movies fit into the MCU. Which is to say that they don't really, except they sorta do, just because it's convenient that way going forward.
 
Well, yes, I know that term. But didn't they do a bunch of that? Somebody here mentioned that they only fleshed out the real story after they realized that this was a huge cash cow, after the success of the first bunch of movies. If it all more or less ties in then that's good enough for me, although I can't remember much at all about the Hulk movies.

edit: I watched Thor and really liked it! I didn't think it would grab me because who cares about Scandinavian gods? But turns out I do

Next up is Iron Man 2 (which I saw like 10 years ago but can't really remember yet)

edit2: I didn't remember Iron man 2 or 3. I have no idea which one I watched way back now.. Maybe it was a dream.. I liked these two

I thought I was looking at Val Kilmer the whole time, they had me fooled. I looked up the actor and.. what. Fake Kilmer
 
Last edited:
I read today that Elizabeth Olsen is decamping to England next month to shoot Doctor Strange and the Multiverse of Madness. WandaVision has been pushed back to January, although I'm not sure why (post-production probably got delayed or stretched due to the pandemic, I s'pose). The nerdosphere is all abuzz with speculation that these two together will comprise the MCU's adaptation of House of M, that Olsen will be the villain of the Dr. Strange movie, and that the conclusion of that story will bring mutants into the MCU. Can't stop nerds from speculatin'. Nerds gonna nerd.

Also, Chris Pratt is officially in Thor: Love & Thunder. I'd guess his role will be small, but who knows..? Their banter was great, so maybe they're writing him into a significant role.
 
I hope you guys don't mind me quickly reviewing these movies, as I make my way through them. Let's recap:

  • Captain America: The First Avenger - I liked this one the least. I am trying to figure out why and it just mainly didn't grab me. I enjoyed watching how the puny dude turns into the superhero, but I couldn't handle the Nazis, especially the one with the red head. It sort of got more and more silly for me. I didn't hate this movie, but it didn't keep my attention very well. The Captain America character is fine and I like him, but it was the story that was the problem for me here. I suppose we'll see if I like the next one - maybe there is something about the superhero that is bugging me that I haven't quite figured out yet.
  • Captain Marvel - This was one of my favourites so far. There were twists here that kept me engaged and surprised. Again, I have the benefit of knowing virtually nothing about this universe, so I am able to watch some of these movies without really knowing anything.. So in this case, the surprises and twists were done quite well and kept me guessing. Jude Law was also very good in his role, and I quite like the actress who played Captain Marvel. I've never seen her in anything before I don't think, and she's just got this.. charisma. Of course she's also attractive, but I found myself rooting for her quite a bit, moreso than some of the other superheroes. She was probably written this way, to appeal to "the common man/woman"? I'm not sure, but I liked that this was essentially a sci-fi action flick with some interesting twists. At first I thought the aliens were stupid (the only criticism I can think of), but I quickly changed my mind and the plot just kept pulling me away from criticisms.
  • Iron Man - I quite liked this "origins story" type movie about Iron Man. They wrote him very well and made it easy to relate to him - even though he's got many qualities I do not value. The character redeems himself many times throughout the 3 movies, which I also liked. Just good writing all around. The "How could just one engineer be brilliant enough to invent all this stuff?" wasn't really a problem for me. Plot was good enough for me to not question that too much, although I did a bit initially, when he was building the prototype in the cave. All in all this was one of my favourite of these movies as well.
  • Iron Man 2 - All the same stuff applies to this one as in the first one, although I liked this one a bit less. I liked the main baddie, although I thought that the guy who hired him was not that realistic as a character. i.e. that whole thing just seemed off to me. But overall a good movie! I liked that the story revolved around the implications the first one sort of put in our heads.
  • Thor - Another one I quite liked, and I didn't think I would. I really liked the whole "Scandinavian weirdo from another dimension has to deal with human customs" part of the story, that sort of thing seems to appeal to me. It was also done quite well, and I liked how "well, I'm doing this without really caring who cares" Thor was about everything. which you'd expect from somebody like that. At first I did not like the romance angle at all (between Thor and Jane), but eventually it sort of just worked. I'm not sure at which point in the movie I was convinced that this was the way, but.. yeah, not a problem anymore.
  • The Avengers - I watched this movie first, and after watching all the other movies on this list I went back to it and re-watched the first 20 minutes and several key moments, so that I could properly wrap my brain around the plot. It helped me connect all these movies better, but it did leave me a bit more confused about the Tesseract. I tried to remember how this object passed from one set of hands to the other, and I just could not remember how SHIELD got a hold of it. So I went back and re-read the synopsis of all these movies to reacquaint myself. And I gotta say, this whole Tesseract thing is the most flimsy part of this whole series. And it is holding all these movies together, which I find a bit problematic.. but in the sense that the overall story is flimsy - individually these movies are quite good, for the most part. Side Question: where did this object originate from? If this is covered in one of the later movies please do not answer. If it was covered in one of these movies, then plz refresh my memory. I know that the Asgardians had it, but why'd they bring it to Earth and why did they leave it there for the Nazis to find? It would be nice if there was a graph/chart that shows you how this object affects and travels through all these movies, does something like that exist? ANYWAY, overall this movie was good and I liked the epic action scenes, although what's the point of a flying aircraft carrier? I never got that part either.
  • Iron Man 3 - All I want to say about this one is that I thought that Val Kilmer was in the movie. I only found out that wasn't him after the credits rolled and I started questioning his age.. I guess the other thing is that I found some of the things in this movie a bit silly maybe, like all the different suits he had. But not a huge problem and the plot was good overall. I liked this one the least out of the 3, but still a strong movie overall. Iron Man is probably one of my top 3 superheroes out of all these leading characters. Although that is also a tough call, as each one sort of has different redeeming characteristics.
  • Thor: Dark World - Okay, so at first I was rolling my eyes a bit when it was sort of clear that Jane and Thor would meet again or whatever, but I found this to be a basically.. Lord of the Rings on stereoids in space sort of movie. A sci-fi flick involving hobbits, orcs, and space wizards. Very entertaining and since it's a fantasy sci-fi sort of fare, and it was sort or "in yo face" half the movie, it was easier to suspend your disbelief and just take this in as a sci-fi space opera flick. Eventually I was fully on board with Thor and Jane meeting again and getting it on and all that, somehow the movie was able to convince me that this was all a good idea. I put it down to good character development and good writing, and of course good actors in these roles. I also liked how Loki goes from good guy to bad guy back to good buy back to bad guy. I only ever saw this guy in The Avengers before this, so this movie kept me guessing. By the end of this movie I liked Loki as a character a lot more. After The Avengers I thought he was dunce and not much of a character really.
The next 4 movies I'm watching:
  • Captain America: Winter Soldier
  • Guardians of the Galaxy
  • Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2
  • Avengers: Age of Ultron
So we'll see if i like the Captain America sequel more than the first one. I've already seen GotG but I quite liked it, so I will watch it again. I hated the first 20 minutes of vol.2 and turned it off (a couple years ago), but I'm going to try watching it again. And then of course I get to find out what the hell an Ultron is. (probably not CPU architecture name, but you never know)

Let me know if I should watch these movies in a different order.

Another question - why aren't all of the Spiderman movies on the recommended watching list? They only have Homecoming and Far from home on this list - weren't there more earlier spiderman movies that set up the character and so on? If I should watch any of those, I can slot them in too.
 
Top Bottom