Swedishguy
Deity
I actually can't see the point against it. And if there really is an overlapping space in age, set a limit. Easy.
Are you afraid they will create an army of Radioactive Monkeys? And tobacco and chocolate should be outlawed! I don't like morons to play around with their bodies.Atlas14 said:I think it should be outlawed. I don't like morons to play around with genetics.
Comraddict said:Again this topic on CFC. Promoting incest should be illegal.
Swedishguy said:Are you afraid they will create an army of Radioactive Monkeys? And tobacco and chocolate should be outlawed! I don't like morons to play around with their bodies.
Care for an elaboration?Babbler said:No, it should be illegal.
mdwh said:So what about same-sex incest (between adults)? Or non-vaginal sex? Or where contraception is used?
I'm not sure what the law on these matters are, but I presume those saying it should be illegal due to genetics are referring to for the purpose of having children.
Also remember that many people may oppose it, but still believe it should be legal - the poll options are a bit misleading in this regard.
So how do you know which one raped which?Atlas14 said:Well in incest "relationships" it is harder to distinguish from the outside whether it is a consenting relationship.
mdwh said:So how do you know which one raped which?
Even if you say it's the parent in a parent/son-or-daughter case (similar to the way it's the minor who can't consent in an adult/minor case), what about two brothers or sisters?
Presumably the law would say that both adults are guilty of a crime, which doesn't make sense if we are comparing it to underage sex (imagine sending the child to prison too!)
What if both people stand up in court and say "We consented to this" - they should still both be guilty?
I've already covered that in this post: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=4722483&postcount=34Atlas14 said:Well the thought of intentionally producing a child with limited genetic variability is not very appeasing to me.