And now it finished downloadingBy the way raxo dowload this compressed file (226 MB), it contains all current FPK's.
Good thing, that it can be downloaded, even with spotty internet unlike sourceforge
And now it finished downloadingBy the way raxo dowload this compressed file (226 MB), it contains all current FPK's.
That would be endorsed by me! Although I think "Like" is the new word used for that.Maybe Megafauna should be one to the right and off of animal riding instead. As has been recently discussed elsewhere.
@KaTiON_PT you can make screenshots of tech tree again - not sure how you made solid background for techs.
Icons changed places in other eras too, as I removed tech requirement redundancies, and I made sure that tech requirement outside of <techtypes> (techtypes is representing secondary tech requirements) is most advanced one.
Icons changed places in other eras too, as I removed tech requirement redundancies, and I made sure that tech requirement outside of <techtypes> (techtypes is representing secondary tech requirements) is most advanced one.
Yeah, first I'll spellcheck your renamesTech trees don't have my renamed revisions in them. Is it possible that you could update them?
I think his tech renames weren't needed at all, especially ones that made techs to sound too specific, and those that reverted Pepper's renames.Questions:
How many times do we need to change Tech names? How much confusion is it causing?
I know someone's going to tell me I can easily look at the compare in GitHub, and that's true, but would someone help me out by listing off the techs old and new names? In my unit review I'm considering future units in some chains and need to know if any concepts have been adjusted - I may agree or disagree with some name changes and because of the original way it was done when I went to look at comparing it I wasn't able to.I think his tech renames weren't needed at all, especially ones that made techs to sound too specific, and those that reverted Pepper's renames.
I know someone's going to tell me I can easily look at the compare in GitHub, and that's true, but would someone help me out by listing off the techs old and new names? In my unit review I'm considering future units in some chains and need to know if any concepts have been adjusted - I may agree or disagree with some name changes and because of the original way it was done when I went to look at comparing it I wasn't able to.
For the lols, let's see if we're "on the same page".Thank you. Upon a quick review I like about 20% of these changes and would probably want about 80% or so reversed. I'll review them in depth later.