Term 1 - Judiciary

I have a proposed amendment to the Code of Laws I would like to bring before the Judiciary. It can be located at this thread. It changes how vacancies are filled in the government, and limits the number of government positions one person may hold. Post #30 is a mock poll. The only response so far deals with minor changes, mostly grammatical, that have been changed. I have left out the ( [ ) before the links to the discussion threads to make it easier for a Justice to copy and paste the thread.

I would like to thank the Justices before hand for looking at this bill. I would also like to thank the Justices that helped me craft the bill.
 
GeorgeOP's request for Judicial Review of a proposed amendment on multiple offices and vacancies (located here) is accepted and placed on the docket as C4DG1JR5.
 
After review, the Public Defender finds the proposal not to conflict with existing laws. The specific post linked does not include the sections that should be removed, although those sections are clearly listed in the discussion thread shortly before the proposed poll.

The Public Defender recommends that the Chief Justice include mention of the sections of the Code of Laws to be removed when posting the official poll.

-- Ravensfire, Public Defender
 
The proposed amendment to the code of laws does not conflict with our constitution or non-amended / deleted sections of the code of laws.

The mock poll is unclear as to the sections of the code of laws being deleted and it is suggested the Chief Justice rectify this when posting the actual ratification poll.

donsig
Judge Advocate
 
The proposed law does not conflict with the Constitution or introduce internal conflicts within the CoL given the sections being replaced are deleted.

I agree with the recommendations of the JA and PD to be very careful when posting the ratification poll to make it clear what is being deleted and moved to new sections. :)

The poll will be posted shortly. (Just needs to be before 5pm my time tomorrow in order for it to still be term 1) :cool:
 
It is with the utmost thanks to my fellow members of the bench, Chief Justice DaveShack and Judge Advocate donsig, that I bid a farewell to Term 1.

We covered some dramatic events and help get the Judiciary for the Civ 4 DG off to a great start. We set the standard high - nice job! To the citizens that helped us in our rulings - my deepest thanks. Your views and insights are desired and valuable, keep it up!

-- Ravensfire, Public Defender
 
It's been real. It's been fun. It's been real fun. Thanks CJ DaveShack and PD Ravensfire. I think we did all right.

Note: I am not a Civfanatics staff member and that thing on the bottom of my avatar is not a badge.
 
Back
Top Bottom