The 65-Civ Mod!

three choices for scottish leader for ya from a scotsman

Robert the Bruce - helped scotland regain indipendence (for a while)

Bonnie Prince Charlie - unified the northen clans and carried out a very sucssesful invasion of England, got as far as darby (100 miles approx from london) before turning back to be defeted by an overwhelming british force at culloden feils

William Wallace - (forget braveheart) one of the first leaders to arise in the struggle for scottish indipendence (note how we failed :( ) in turn becoming one of our national heros

as for leader traits, militerised is def one any scottish leader should have the other im not sure about

and starting tech for the scots should be farming and husbandry, as most highland clans when not fighting the english specialised in farming the highlands

hope this helps in any way

and for a laugh you mite wanna include Mcbeth as he was an actual scottish king :D
 
AluminumKnight said:
Yes! Those traits are awesome!

AlCosta, who are you using for Carib leaders? Since I already read all of the background on them, I can probably suggest traits.

I'll use Hyarima and Anacaona.
Thank you for this help.
 
Towsnley said:
three choices for scottish leader for ya from a scotsman

Robert the Bruce - helped scotland regain indipendence (for a while)

Bonnie Prince Charlie - unified the northen clans and carried out a very sucssesful invasion of England, got as far as darby (100 miles approx from london) before turning back to be defeted by an overwhelming british force at culloden feils

William Wallace - (forget braveheart) one of the first leaders to arise in the struggle for scottish indipendence (note how we failed :( ) in turn becoming one of our national heros

as for leader traits, militerised is def one any scottish leader should have the other im not sure about

and starting tech for the scots should be farming and husbandry, as most highland clans when not fighting the english specialised in farming the highlands

hope this helps in any way

and for a laugh you mite wanna include Mcbeth as he was an actual scottish king :D

Thank you for these. I'm going to use Robert the Bruce and William Wallace.
 
Hyarima - Definitely Aggressive, but the other one is between Charismatic (he allied with the Dutch and was/is pretty much a saint among his own people), Spiritual and Agricultural
Anacaona - Agricultural/Seafaring would probably be best

I'm thinking Gli Gli warrior might be a better choice for a UU than the canoe, as naval UUs are just not that useful. I'm thinking they should replace either the maceman or the swordsman, and have an added withdrawal chance, or start with Woodsman I or something. Also, a blowgunner might work too.
 
AlCosta15 said:
America
Arabs
Aztecs
China
Egypt
England
France
Germany
Greece
Inca
India
Japan
Mali
Mongolia
Persia
Rome
Russia
Spain

That would be all 18 standard Civs. This is addressed to EVERYONE who has been saying that ____ civ overlaps or messes up _____ civ somehow, and thus should be taken off the list of 65.

America, pre-18th century, was controlled by England. Oh no! America should be taken out of the game!

The Arabs probably refers to the original Islamic Empire, considering that the capital is Mecca. Oops! That area was originally controlled by Persia (at least going by that list of 18). Therefore Islam should be taken out.

Egypt. They are considered the first true civilization. They should probably be left in. Then again, the Ottoman Empire (which was one of three fraction empires created when the origional Islamic Empire fell) controlled Egypt at one time. Should Egypt be counted? Oh noes!

Aztecs. They were taken over by Spain and wiped out. They should be taken out.

China. They're been around longer than anyone in that 18 except Egypt, I believe. They're still around today. They should probably be left up. Then again, Kublai Khan actually ruled over China. So China should be out too!

England. Half of England was origionally controlled by the Roman Empire, and before them by Saxon and Anglo tribes. England should be taken out!

France. Long before the real nation of France exhisted, there was the Roman territory known as Gaul. France should be taken out.

Germany. While they were never under the thumb of any of those 18 civs, Germany origionally was a loose confederation of principalities which made up part of the Holy Roman Empire. Germany should be taken out!

Greece. The Greek city states were never a unified nation. That alone should get them excluded. They were also taken over by the Mongols. Greece should be taken out.

Inca. The Inca fell to a Spanish force under Pizarro in 1533 and were completely destroyed, later becoming modern Peru after being part of the Spanish empire. The Inca should be taken out.

India. They've been around for a hella long time. Then again, the British took over. So, at one point, India was a British territory. India should be taken out. After all, we want to be completely 100% historically accurate here.

Japan. They, too, have been around for a while. They've also managed to maintain some form of independance even in the colonial era. So Japan stays.

Mali. Taken over by the Islamic Empire (Arabs) and the Ottoman Empire. They should be taken out.

Mongolia. Included pretty much all of Asia plus Russia. Then again, they fell and were replaced by multiple nations including China and Russia. So they should be taken out in the interests of historical accuracy.

Persia. They didn't really last too long in the grand scheme of things. They were part of the Islamic Empire (Arabs), and later briefly came back in the form of Safavid Persia. However, they no longer exhist today and they did get wiped out by one of the 18 standard civs. So they should be taken out.

Rome. Fell. Need more be said? If yes, Rome included Britain, France, and had major influence in Germany. They should be taken out. It should also be noted that the main Ottoman city of Istanbul actually used to be the city of Constantinople, which was the capital of Byzantium. However, Byzantium was part of the Roman empire. All things considered, Rome should be taken out too.

Russia. Russia was part of the Mongolian Empire. It also did not exhist as a civilization before roughly 1160 C.E. Therefore, Russia should be taken out.

Spain. Prior to Ferdinand and Isabella, the Most Catholic Monarchs as they were called, Spain was under the rule of the Islamic Empire (Arabs). They should be taken out.

Gee. Maybe we should just call it CIVILIZATION 5 - JAPAN! If you want to, you can make a case that no civilization (even Japan - I don't know Japanese history that well) on the face of the planet that has ever exhisted should be in the game. Civ isn't about history. Oh my gosh! The Holy Roman Empire doesn't exist today and included Germany! We all gunna die! If the Civilization games were about historical accuracy, you wouldn't have the United States fighting ancient Greece! You wouldn't have Peter the Great ruling Russia for over 6000 years! Heck - you wouldn't even HAVE Russia until the 12th century! I hope I've made my point with that little list.

(By the way, I did 0 research to look that stuff up. That's all from what I remember and know from history - I'm studying to be a historian so I remember enough to get by. Please don't reply with something like, "ZOMG j00 so wrong wit yo history!" because I simply don't care. If you want me to write a historically accurate essay down to every last detail, then I'll crack open a textbook. I wasn't trying to be 100% correct - just enough to make my point.)

Now for the changes you've made thus far.

First Change:Turks replaced with Austrians

I personally think it's fine to have a Turkish civ. I mean, the Ottomans were known as the Ottoman Turks. You cannot tell me that everyone from the Middle East is Turkish. Therefore, the argument against a Turkish civ falls apart. I think that a Turkish civ works quite well.

Second Change:Took out Soviet Union(will replace one leader with Soviet)

Good change. USSR = Russia.

Third Change:Quebec gone, Macedonia gone, Gauls gone, Abyssinia gone,Mexico In, Turks back In.

Quebec: Good.
Macedonia: That would be a good civ. Macedonia was not part of Ancient Greece. In fact, Alexander and his father, Philip, cannot be considered Greek - it's a very important fact that Alexander (a Macedonian) took over Greece, Egypt, and much of Persia.
Gauls: Yeah - Gauls = France. You could make a case that the Gauls were their own civ, but that's just a bit redundant.
Mexico: Good. I lived in Mexico for 3 years. I'd love to have a Mexican civ.
Turks: Excellent.

Fourth Change:Holy Roman Empire gone, Assyria gone, Bulgaria In

Holy Roman Empire: The HRE would make an excellent Civ. It had its own rulers, who couldn't be considered German by any stretch, and played an important role in history. The Sack of Rome (not the first one, but during the Reformation) was done by HRE forces under Charles V. Charlemagne was the first HRE emperor.

Fifth Change:Sweden In, Armenia/Scythia(Need to Decide) In, Celts In, Madagascar gone, Maori In, Touaregs replace generic Berbers,Navajo In, Switzerland Gone, Kazhaks In, Tupis Gone.

Sweden: Good. They date back to Reformation times, so I personally think they're important enough to be a civ. They've been around longer than the USA.
Navajo: You might want to do yourself a favor and make an American Indian civ and then have Navajo/Iriquois rulers.
Maori: Good choice taking them out - from what I can remember, they were a nomadic peoples who founded many African nations. Correct me if I'm wrong here - African history (beyond Egypt) is not my strength.
Switz: Eh. Good one to take out I guess, but you can go either way on this one. Swiss would be good to set toward industrious and something else economic. And they could even have a militia special unit; the Swiss army, from what I know, consist mostly of normal citizens armed with their AKs.

Sixth Change:Khmer In, Huns Gone, Tibet In, Ukirane gone, South Africa combined with Zululand,Songhai In, Babylon combined with Sumeria

But Babylon and Sumeria were different. In fact, Babylon took over Sumeria. If you wanted to combine them, it'd be best to make a Fertile Crescent civ. Then again, we're not exactly going for accuracy, are we? You'd run out of city names pretty quick too.

Seventh Change:Byzantines In, Micronesians Gone
Excellent news of the Byzantines. They're important.


That's all I have to say. I know this is my first post here, and that I'm a new member, but I've lurked for quite some time and I'm a big fan of Civ. Sorry if I seemed a bit harsh making my first point, but I thought it was a point which had to be made.

EDIT: Wow. I just realized that I posted just a wee bit too late in the topic for this point. That'll teach me to stop reading on page 2. Sorry for the redundant post.
 
First of all one important change would be that Germany and Austria are one civilization. Second the idea that Germany as a civilization should be removed is not a good idea. Germany has always existed since the Roman times. The Germanic tribes in what is now modern Germany always have lived in a lose confoderation with each other, yes they did figth each other at times, but this is similar to China that has often also been in a state of disarray and fighting. I agree that Civilization is not about hundred percent accurancy its a game its about making your own story your own history. But when it comes to creating a mod that includes 65 civs, then there should be a sense of accurancy. Anyways I believe that Austria should not be included, it is more or less part of the German Empire, or part of the German History, Austrians, have about as much cultural difference from Germany as the southern German state Bavaria, and nowone would ever include that nation as a civ.
 
AluminumKnight said:
Hyarima - Definitely Aggressive, but the other one is between Charismatic (he allied with the Dutch and was/is pretty much a saint among his own people), Spiritual and Agricultural
Anacaona - Agricultural/Seafaring would probably be best

I'm thinking Gli Gli warrior might be a better choice for a UU than the canoe, as naval UUs are just not that useful. I'm thinking they should replace either the maceman or the swordsman, and have an added withdrawal chance, or start with Woodsman I or something. Also, a blowgunner might work too.

I'll use the Gli Gli Warrior.
 
Good change. USSR = Russia.

Yeah, I realized that woesn't such a great idea.:blush:

Quebec: Good.
Macedonia: That would be a good civ. Macedonia was not part of Ancient Greece. In fact, Alexander and his father, Philip, cannot be considered Greek - it's a very important fact that Alexander (a Macedonian) took over Greece, Egypt, and much of Persia.
Gauls: Yeah - Gauls = France. You could make a case that the Gauls were their own civ, but that's just a bit redundant.
Mexico: Good. I lived in Mexico for 3 years. I'd love to have a Mexican civ.
Turks: Excellent.

Yeah, Quebec was a bad idea.:blush:
Macedonia-I forget why I took them out. They would be in if I had more room.
Gauls-Another bad idea.
Mexico-got a lot of support for them.
Turks-I love the Turks!!!!

Holy Roman Empire: The HRE would make an excellent Civ. It had its own rulers, who couldn't be considered German by any stretch, and played an important role in history. The Sack of Rome (not the first one, but during the Reformation) was done by HRE forces under Charles V. Charlemagne was the first HRE emperor.

That's what I said, but not enough people agreed with me.

Sweden: Good. They date back to Reformation times, so I personally think they're important enough to be a civ. They've been around longer than the USA.
Navajo: You might want to do yourself a favor and make an American Indian civ and then have Navajo/Iriquois rulers.
Maori: Good choice taking them out - from what I can remember, they were a nomadic peoples who founded many African nations. Correct me if I'm wrong here - African history (beyond Egypt) is not my strength.
Switz: Eh. Good one to take out I guess, but you can go either way on this one. Swiss would be good to set toward industrious and something else economic. And they could even have a militia special unit; the Swiss army, from what I know, consist mostly of normal citizens armed with their AKs.

Sweden-Very Good.:)
Navajo-No, I like having two Native American nations to represent the west and the east.
Maori-They're in, they're actually from New Zealand.
Swiss-I doubt they have AKs.

But Babylon and Sumeria were different. In fact, Babylon took over Sumeria. If you wanted to combine them, it'd be best to make a Fertile Crescent civ. Then again, we're not exactly going for accuracy, are we? You'd run out of city names pretty quick too.

Yes, they're very different. When I made this decision, I wanted them represented and some other civ in there too. I actually already made a city name list for it. I just used Sumerian cities with Babylon as the capital.

Excellent news of the Byzantines. They're important.


That's all I have to say. I know this is my first post here, and that I'm a new member, but I've lurked for quite some time and I'm a big fan of Civ. Sorry if I seemed a bit harsh making my first point, but I thought it was a point which had to be made.

EDIT: Wow. I just realized that I posted just a wee bit too late in the topic for this point. That'll teach me to stop reading on page 2. Sorry for the redundant post.

Thanks for the points.
I dont care on harshness.
Ahh, who cares about the timing. You're a new poster.
 
manuveth said:
First of all one important change would be that Germany and Austria are one civilization. Second the idea that Germany as a civilization should be removed is not a good idea. Germany has always existed since the Roman times. The Germanic tribes in what is now modern Germany always have lived in a lose confoderation with each other, yes they did figth each other at times, but this is similar to China that has often also been in a state of disarray and fighting. I agree that Civilization is not about hundred percent accurancy its a game its about making your own story your own history. But when it comes to creating a mod that includes 65 civs, then there should be a sense of accurancy. Anyways I believe that Austria should not be included, it is more or less part of the German Empire, or part of the German History, Austrians, have about as much cultural difference from Germany as the southern German state Bavaria, and nowone would ever include that nation as a civ.

No, you're wrong. The Austrians have their own culture and civ. There is a good sense of accuracy.
If you don't want Austria, could I please get a suggestion?
 
nvm. didn't see that production is starting. sry
 
add burma burma burma!!! or myanmar (it's the same) please

leader - General Aung San
 
HRE was not a civilization in any kind of way. It was a collection of states, if it should be added to the game, it should be as some kind of early UN for states sharing a common religion.
 
Carewolf said:
HRE was not a civilization in any kind of way. It was a collection of states, if it should be added to the game, it should be as some kind of early UN for states sharing a common religion.

Wow, thats a good idea. Maybe I could include them as an early UN of some kind.
 
Dear AlCosta15,

I suggest that you reconsider several civs in the Southeast Asia region to reflect balance, popularity, and historical conscience:

My personal choice:
Malacca
I have a plan to do this mod. Malacca is an empire in the 14th to 15th century, and at it's peak it controlled the Straits of Malacca and its surrounding area. It was said that Malacca was the Venice of the east - center of trade. It has a good relation with China during that time, until it was defeated by Portugese in 1511.

Other possible civilization:
Acheh
It rise to be a strong civilization after Malacca fell to Portugese. At it's peak, it controlled the northern part of Straits of Malacca. It was at war with Portugese until the Dutch came at around 17th century. However, there's a political dispute about this civ: in real politics, Acheh is considered to be part of Indonesia, so I'm not surprised if anyone wished for it to be part of Indonesia civ (it sounds funny).

Burma/Thailand(Ayutthaya)/Cambodia(Khemer)/Vietnam(Champa)
There are several ancient kingdoms here, but my lack of knowledge in it's history forbids me in giving accurate info (name in bracket). It is possible to group it into one major civ, but I don't have any good name for it. Since we have Angkor Wat as a wonder, this is a good consideration too. Siam and Khemer, they share the same root, might be possible to combine them... and as for Vietnam, it was part of China until it broke up.
Additional info: http://berclo.net/page00/00en-sea-history.html
by reading the info, it'll be clear that they do belong to one group or so...

Phillippine/Sulu
There was a Sulu Kingdom before the Spanish conquered the island now known as the phillippine. It covers the islands and part of borneo.

Brunei
Brunei is an ancient kingdom that still exist until today. It flourished right after the fall of Malacca, but it lose power and eventually fell under British rule in the 18th century.

Java
The kingdom of Java, where all codings are slaved... sorry, wrong info :p This is also a good consideration, since the famous Bali and the ancient Borobudur is part of the kingdom until the arrival of the Dutch.

There, I think my reason is good and justified enough... maybe the 65 civ can be expand a little bit to, say, 75 civ?

Okay, it might be tough to set it, and i appreciate any suggestion or correction to my propose idea above.
 
quastar said:
Dear AlCosta15,

I suggest that you reconsider several civs in the Southeast Asia region to reflect balance, popularity, and historical conscience:

My personal choice:
Malacca
I have a plan to do this mod. Malacca is an empire in the 14th to 15th century, and at it's peak it controlled the Straits of Malacca and its surrounding area. It was said that Malacca was the Venice of the east - center of trade. It has a good relation with China during that time, until it was defeated by Portugese in 1511.

Other possible civilization:
Acheh
It rise to be a strong civilization after Malacca fell to Portugese. At it's peak, it controlled the northern part of Straits of Malacca. It was at war with Portugese until the Dutch came at around 17th century. However, there's a political dispute about this civ: in real politics, Acheh is considered to be part of Indonesia, so I'm not surprised if anyone wished for it to be part of Indonesia civ (it sounds funny).

Burma/Thailand(Ayutthaya)/Cambodia(Khemer)/Vietnam(Champa)
There are several ancient kingdoms here, but my lack of knowledge in it's history forbids me in giving accurate info (name in bracket). It is possible to group it into one major civ, but I don't have any good name for it. Since we have Angkor Wat as a wonder, this is a good consideration too. Siam and Khemer, they share the same root, might be possible to combine them... and as for Vietnam, it was part of China until it broke up.
Additional info: http://berclo.net/page00/00en-sea-history.html
by reading the info, it'll be clear that they do belong to one group or so...

Phillippine/Sulu
There was a Sulu Kingdom before the Spanish conquered the island now known as the phillippine. It covers the islands and part of borneo.

Brunei
Brunei is an ancient kingdom that still exist until today. It flourished right after the fall of Malacca, but it lose power and eventually fell under British rule in the 18th century.

Java
The kingdom of Java, where all codings are slaved... sorry, wrong info :p This is also a good consideration, since the famous Bali and the ancient Borobudur is part of the kingdom until the arrival of the Dutch.

There, I think my reason is good and justified enough... maybe the 65 civ can be expand a little bit to, say, 75 civ?

Okay, it might be tough to set it, and i appreciate any suggestion or correction to my propose idea above.


Hmm, interesting ideas. I dont think Malacca is not big enough to include.
Acheh-Same as above
Burma/Thailand/Cambodia/Vietnam-I'm pretty sure the last three are in.
Phillipines-Not sure I want them in.
Brunei-Way too unsignifigant
Java-A good idea, it might be in my next modpack.

Oh, for the number of civs. 65 is set. I have decided to make a 65-Civ Mod2 with 65 new civs to play.
 
I think that vietnam can be replaced with something else, because it's not that big, and from history point of view, it's just a splinter civ from china...

Malacca is big, and quite important too. THat's why the portugese conquered it.
 
quastar said:
I think that vietnam can be replaced with something else, because it's not that big, and from history point of view, it's just a splinter civ from china...

Malacca is big, and quite important too. THat's why the portugese conquered it.

What if I replaced Vietnam with Malaysia/Malacca civ?
 
Back
Top Bottom